Looks like Obama;s Executive order has failed in Federal Court uet again

Nope, sorry, but wishful thinking does not alter the meaning of your first two words posted in response to the OP, "Your ignorance . . . " That IS a personal attack. The obvious thing to do at this point is to gracefully acknowledge the point.

 

when a person is said to be ignorant it means they don't know something...it is that simple. Why do you need to twist and distort everything?

:Ignorant
lacking knowledge or information
resulting from or showing a lack of knowledge
Merriam webster

 

I would think the ignorance of this Administration is astounding. They have lost 5 times in court on this so far.

 

Its all just a show he is putting on when he knows his amnesty will be denied by law no matter what, his simple minded followers will see it as the fault of republicans.

 

see it is actually you that are ignorant, the SG has lost only once and won once on this topic. People like Cruz are flat out lying about the facts.
You cast yourself as a part of the right lie machine. the ironic thing is Obama has screwed up enough that the right need not keep making up bald arsed lies. it is a presidents job to decide how to enforce the law and they do it with executive orders. hence the need for you guys to take a civics 101 class. you really don't get how things work.

 

Seems to me the wise thing for YOU is not to throw words like "ignorance" out.

 

the civil thing to do would be to apologize for being ignorant.

 

Ignorance is relative.

Little Sisters of the Poor, Wheaton College, the University of Notre Dame, Hobby Lobby, and of course this latest stay. These are by no means limited to the SC and the Administration has taken a pounding in the lower courts too, Hercules Industries, for example.

It isn't the President's job to decide if the law is right or not and move on feelings but to uphold the law and that is something counter to this Administrations goals.

- - - Updated - - -

Yet you won't.

 

Then I suggest you apologize to OP.

 

address the problem however they want, you know, do their jobs, I am not saying they have to do it like the president wants, get real... just do something...

America voted for Obama twice, the majority obviously want want what Obama wants, but some differ in their opinions, thus the mixed Congress, the mixed Congress is what stops the majority from getting what they want, but you knew that already right.....

.

 

no, an example of your claims that dems have made the same ridiculous claims about the constitution as in the example where Palin did so... .that was what we were discussing

you asked me if I would also ridicule them, I said show me some examples....


- - - Updated - - -

grey areas are often tested in the courts, yes, that is business as usual....

just like all the republican bills attacking same gender marriage that are getting shot down....


.

 

The people been demanding congress and the president to do their job for decades......like securing our border.

Maybe just maybe after you achieve that promise then we can talk about other things.

 

oh, the piece of it has been "trying to address the issue', all right, trying to GIVE AWAY the Us to anyone who want a pc of it. Trying to add about 10 milllon voters to the dem party, even if it means the total collapse of the US.

 

Midterms are almost always a referendum on the president's policies. Obama was defeated.

 

President Obama has the authority to grant reprieves and pardons under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution; and Congress cannot limit the President's grant of amnesty or pardon. United States v. Klein, 80 U.S. 128 (1871). The only limitation of the President's power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States is for cases of impeachment.

The pardon power extends to amnesty for offenses against the United States, which would include violation of the federal immigration laws. Unlawful entry into the United States is an offense that carries both civil and criminal penalties. See INA § 275(a); 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a). The President has the power to pardon both; and there is plenty of precedent for it. See article at:
http://www.businessinsider.com/reagan-and-bush-made-immigration-executive-orders-2014-11

 

lol, Obama was not defeated, he was elected both terms

fact is, the right had more motivation to get out and vote, nothing more, not as many get out to vote on midterms which is a shame really as that makes their votes that much more important

 

republicans had full control under Bush, why did they not build this wall they want so bad?

 

Two words......Cheap labor.

Back in 06 when I was advocating conservatives to stay home this was one of my reasons....actually one of many reason but broken promise is still a broken promise.

Secure the damn border first....then we can talk. It's been nearly 30 years now.

 

He was defeated in the 2014 midterms.

 

apologize for telling the truth...how right wing of you.

 

ignorance is not relative, either you are or you are not....look it up in the dictionary.

- - - Updated - - -

he didn't run in 201, more ignorance.

 

The 2014 Midterm was a referendum on Obama's policies.

 

no, 2014 was the result of successful gerrymandering.