2 armed suspects shot outside Mohammed art event in Texas >Read mod warning in OP<

We progressives don't do that, but we sure as hell ain't having a dammed recruitment drive for them in the United States like Texas apparently is putting on.

- - - Updated - - -

Sure, whatever you say, if that were the case the billion and a half Muslims across the planet would overrun the rest of the world pretty damned quickly. And they sure as hell wouldn't be fighting ISIS now would they?

 

Ok, I'll admit that you might have a pretty good approach here. You just don't give a D....I can respect that. I do however think that the more Mohammad is (rightly, not wrongly) criticized for his anti-human behavior the better. Obama won't. Bush won't. CNN won't. Etc., etc., won't. But Geller/Spencer will.

 

Good, now that we got that stupid bull(*)(*)(*)(*) out of the way, do you think it's a good idea for Texans to actively recruit for terrorist groups in this manner?

We all know that terrorists are a bag full of crazy, and that any stupid thing sets them off. Do you think it's a wise idea to do this INSIDE the United States?

 

[video=youtube;IxAKFlpdcfc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxAKFlpdcfc&feature=player_detailpage[/video]

 

Get yourself educated or you will get your feelings hurt real bad.

Why Aren&#8217;t All Muslims Jihadists?
[video=youtube;If5gXh7uVIo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=If5gXh7uVIo[/video]

Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink: http://politicalislam.com/why-arent-all-muslims-jihadists/
Copyright © 2014 CSPI, LLC, politicalislam.com
Use as needed, just give credit and do not edit.
http://www.politicalislam.com/why-arent-all-muslims-jihadists/
www.politicalislam.com

And here is a lengthy piece on how non Muslims (Kafirs), who out of weakness and ignorance, act as Dhimmis to serve the Jihad.

"There is a hierarchy of dhimmis. At the top of the dhimmi-chain are names such as Bernard Lewis, a Jewish scholar of Islam, and Karen Armstrong, a biographer of Mohammed. But none can top John Esposito in dhimmitude."

http://www.politicalislam.com/the-esposito-school/

Our government and our media might also be included under that description.

 

Thing is ....those virgins are 40 yr old fat men.

 

If you REALLY don't give a (*)(*)(*)(*) you would excuse yourself from this discussion/thread.

Are you waiting for a formal invitation to leave?

Okay.

Shoo, Dhimmi.

 

An artist already did one of those some time ago and it was well publicized at the time.

No violence, of course; Christianity does not justify violence. It's a good religion for a democracy, and Judaism also seems to work in a democratic framework.

The Muslim religion is too easily used to justify violence to make it appropriate in a democracy. It is essentially designed for authoritarian personalities.

Studies were done some time ago that indicated that people raised by authoritarians were rarely able to make a good and reliable adjustment to a democratic leadership style. Muslims whose families have not already made that switch are essentially pre-Archie Bunker in their attitudes and inclinations.

It's too bad our know-it-all leadership didn't do some basic social science research before trying to democratize the Mideast.

 

I have to agree that a little homework would have been a great thing before venturing into the M.E. 'whole hog', so to speak.

But our academics and government officials and military can be SOMEWHAT excused for their ignorance. They had thousands of Muslims blowing Taqiyya up their asses for decades saying that Jihad was nothing more than a form of spiritual yoga. So they had no clue to the spiders nest and can of worms they were entering.

And why were Muslims blowing smoke up their asses about Islam in the first place?

To conceal their Jihad to one day conquer the world and bring all of mankind under islamic rule.

To let Kafirs know the truth would have veered from the example and instructions set down 1400 years ago by the lying, raping, thieving, murderous racist of all time in how to dominate all of mankind, however slowly.

 

The atheists in the US have been deliberately provoking Christians for years without managing a shooting incident.

 

That is what the media and the government are doing.

Dhimmitude.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhimmitude

 

That is a spineless cop out, similar to what NPR did after 9-11.

I refuse to live in fear because we allowed some violence-inclined Muslims into our country.

People that feel they have a right to kill others based on speech have no business coming to this country.

 

Don't know many Xians who do that; you're confused. It's 'new atheists' and other hate groups who continually do that, posing as 'experts' on Xian theology while making blatantly obvious they have absolutely no idea what they're talking about nor do they care that they're lying and slandering. If they did, their memes and 'talking points' would be far different. You yourself do exactly that every single you post some gibberish or other re Christianity.

 

Your lack of respect for those who had the courage to do this does not show you in a good light. Cowardice in defense of basic principles of freedom is rarely admirable.

If early US citizens had all been of your persuasion the US would never even have been formed; we would still be a colony.

It is as important to eradicate abuse from within as without. In this I can agree with the demonstrators at Ferguson and Baltimore. The issues are similar.

What I cannot agree with is violence either to push or quell advocacy.

 

Yes, and don't forget the use of abrogation when referencing the Koran, either. It's a primary form of lying to infidels by quoting isolated verses as propaganda as well, probably more so than taqiyya and kithman.

 

Only if they kill to prevent free speech.

 

Proof? You are overgeneralizing here.

 

I guess bombing abortion clinics doesn't count?

 

Absolutely correct.

I invite you to check out this website.

It's a gold mine of info and very easy to digest in short spurts (for those with short attention spans).

(Not referring to you.)

http://www.politicalislam.com/

 

Can't be worse than Detroit's average of 67.

 

I certainly don't want people becoming terrorists, but then I also ABSOLUTELY do NOT want to maintain a status quo where offending one particularly pigheaded religious group will lead to members of said group turning violent. This is an untenable situation that needs to change, and the only way to change it is to challenge those who issue these threats and launch these attacks, so that 'we' and 'they' can have it out. There will be no change otherwise, and in that event our war effort will indeed have been for naught. If we're going to fight a 'war on terror,' then we'd better be prepared to deal with not only the terrorists, but with that which causes them to become terrorists where others do not become terrorists! I don't care what group it may be, we can't have a group like this in our midst that so strongly opposes our basic liberties.

Those in America who don't like it can LEAVE and go back to one of their beloved theocracies, where insults against their prophet are punished the way they like them to be. These people need to understand that their rules do NOT apply to those who do not subscribe to them.

 

Well the great thing about appeasement is that even though it NEVER works out in the long run it usually generates the illusion of working out in the short run while making the appeasers feel self-righteously good about themselves and -- not incidentally -- giving appeasement advocates among the elite leadership class enough time to run to someplace far, FAR away from future ground zero and the inevitable result of their treasured philosophy.

 

Couldn't have been as low as the IQs of those who decided they'd try to shoot that convention up.

 

Incorrect... these 'terrorist' are practicing the correct islam according to the prophet moohammad(blood be upon him). This barbaric behavior is the true islam rearing its ugly head.

 

It cracks me up how people are saying provoking another religion is an evil thing that only bigots would do.

Then turn around and say how many things need to be changed with Christianity.

Pretty sure Muslims can figure out the fact that killing people is not ok.