Ben Carson Confronted at Town Hall: 'Do You Think I Chose to Be Gay?'

You honestly don't have a clue how HIV is spread or contracted, do you?

 

If he declined hormone therapy as a measurement of remedying the illness, yes, he did in fact choose to be gay.


If he never got tested, yes, these are key things that should be taught in sexual education class such as the effects of Low-T, which some kids suffer from, predominantly homosexuals or very feminine heterosexuals suffering from symptoms that include but are not limited to: Micro-Penis, Mood swings, confused sexual responsiveness, Depression. All listed symptoms of people suffering from Low-T. Hormone therapy has been proven to be a highly effective measure of "fixing" the sexual preferences of these people to conform with the ideas of evolution and humanistic advancement.I wish the left wouldn't denounce anybody actively trying to solve the issue, the word bigot comes up near instantly.

Btw, look at the rates of homosexuals undergoing hormone therapy, and the following rate of the homosexuals who remained that way after a single year of therapy. It will open your eyes to what a mental illness looks like.

The same gos for females with high levels of testosterone in the system, near identical symptoms but in complete reverse.

 

Hormone therapy changes sexual orientation? What medical doctor prescribes hormones to change sexual orientation?

 

You really think that a T-shirt from a community center for gays, which she clearly claims she is a member of, is some how evidence to deny "I didn't choose this"?

No wonder.

 

What the hell are you even talking about? Lesbians are gay, are they not? They belong with us too. Yet in all groups of people including heterosexuals, lesbians are at the least risk for HIV/AIDS. Therefore, being gay is not this terrible thing that in your mind creates AIDS.

That said, two gay men who are in a monogamous relationship who do not have HIV, will never get it. Being gay does not equal getting HIV.

 

Funny that you didn't compare it with a shirt for a local heterosexual community center that proclaimed "we straight" in big bold letters across the front.

Because that would be ridiculous.

 

I'm not religious, and a staunch conservative.

When you are finished with blanket stereotypes, pawning off conservatism to religious crazies, let me know.

Until then, you're just taking the cheap route.

 

Just as the left is always looking for a victim.

In this case, you found another one. Or at least perceived to find yet another.

If somebody thinks they are being victimized, they will convince themselves they are, even if their not.

 

Carson has a point and its not a question that can be quickly answered:

Julie Bindel: You can choose to be gay – I chose to live my life as a lesbian

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/07/0...-choice-i-chose-to-live-my-life-as-a-lesbian/

 

Carson (anyone remember him?) is the ultimate beta.

 

Lesbians don't have anal sex and lesbians make up half of homosexuals. So by definition, the majority of homosexuals can't be having anal sex.

 

Oh.
So a complete nut job that claims she is no longer lesbian because of the magical crucified Jewish guy is what Carson was referring to?

Speaking of which why is it Jesus can make people not gay, not heal the sick, not bring back the dead (except him apparently, he pretty much exempted himself form the whole death thing the selfish bastard), and not stop horrific natural disasters that result in massive death, but he can make people not gay?

 

How do you figure lesbians make up half the homosexual population?

- - - Updated - - -

Most gay guys I know find lesbians repulsive.

- - - Updated - - -

Most gay guys I know find lesbians repulsive.

 

Actually according to this, women make up considerably more than half of the homosexual population: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_sexual_orientation

 

Wiki

 

Without religious nonsense, what is the source of opposition to gay rights? If you truly call yourself a conservative, you should be all for a small encroachment of government into peoples' lives, certainly their bedrooms. Personal freedom?

Please enlighten me, I would really love to hear the justification for bigotry against homosexuals that isn't rooted in bronze age superstition.

 

1993 and 1998 and funny you didn't provide your link...I wonder what whack job blog you are trying to hide?

 

Yup.
It's all about telling people about it. Thats why she was there asking Carson about it anyway. Why else? Who cares what Carson thinks after the USSC decision? Opinions on it no longer matter unless the agenda wants more than the Marriage Equality we heard about.


She's probably got that rainbow bumper sticker too so everyone driving can know.

 

Its not from a blog why dont you google it your self. Were the Kinseys some right wing nut jobs?

- - - Updated - - -

Whats with gay rights? Do we all have the same rights or not. Im tired of hearing of special rights for gays , women etc.


How are we bigoted? I dont treat gays any different than anyone else. Its on an individual basis.

 

You provided the source. You should attribute it.

The more important part is that the two studies that your "sources" cited were from 1993 and 1998. You realize that those are pre-Lawrence v Texas, right? They are from a time where in considerable parts of the country you could be legally imprisoned by the government for having homosexual sex.

 

Please point to evidence of him having a sexual relationships with adult men.

 

Here i will give you a hint . Its from IGF CultureWatch

 

I'm still waiting for your evidence he had sex with prepubescent children, as you claimed.

 

It is well documented that the preferred young waifs. There is no evidence of an adult Harvey Milk ever having a sexual relationship with an adult male. But we know you dont give a (*)(*)(*)(*) because that is etymologically not pedophilia even though it is legally.

 

Again, the studies are from 1993/1998. Admitting you had gay sex in considerable parts of America at those times meant you could potentially be put in prison.