Malcolm X recommended force be used, but Rev Martin Luther King used The Truth to set the black people free. This great example of using Truth for positive change demonstrated to America that, today, Islam is wrong to side with the Jewish patriarchs of old. The terrorist opposition to Western Values that Islam recommends now, needs be replaced by Christians, who ought simply tell the Truth. Terrorism will fail, in spite of the damage it will do to the world economy. But the Truth can change the hearts and minds of people who see the bastards, (which enormous Welfare now pays single mothers to raise), as evil and harmful. Bastard kids grown into the adults which are responsible for 70% of all violent crime. As children, bastard kids suffer enormously double the child abuse of natural parent children. The Feminist Sexual Revolt which changed the Culture soon forced the political culture to accommodate it legally with Abortions, Welfare, No Fault Divorce, Gays in public and marrying openly, plus the doubling of the Unskilled Labor Force, which reduced wages by half. Islam opposes this Feminism with terrorism and Christians have so far failed to tell the statistical Truth about what sexual promiscuity dies to the world within. This present free-for-all Feminist/Gay battle against Islam has every Western nation fighting for what Christians recognize as the great harlot that has sat on the beast of one economy after the last. Ought the churches not explain the Truth factually, and ignore the Bible warnings which are now immaterial? Ought not the Truth end the terrorism and change the Western World for good? What do you think about this Muslim Terrorism against Feminism? And, is Terrorism just another cost for the "freedom" for young people to make bastard kids?
Abortion prevents a lot of what you call "bastards" from being born. Also, homosexuals and otherwise sexually deviant individuals don't raise bad children, bad parents raise bad children. And bad parents can be straight, gay, Christian, Muslim, atheist, intelligent, unintelligent, racy, prude.
Sexual promiscuity is what raises bastard kids, though. Gays and sexually active people need not tell everyone that they are such. It is that these people promote sexual promiscuity, not that they might secretly enjoy it.
Yeah, but sexual promiscuity will happen almost no matter what. People are sexual, and much of people's happiness and often identity relate to romance and sex. Our sexual urges are to some extent calibrated to a world where most offspring dies, and nature has had to put all of its eggs in the basket of reproduction, so it is strong. Denying people sexuality can be detrimental. Of course, the points you bring up are not void, they are perfectly reasonable things to take up, but they are not the entire story. The very fact that you bring up one side of the coin and not mention the other says to me that you're more motivated by preconception than finding a well balanced solution to the problem. Letting the pendulum swing either way is bad, and anyone whose arguments don't reflect that come across as not really understanding the entire issue. The main argument is of course contraception. Today's contraception is pretty efficient, and the limiting factor to its efficiency is information. It's not 100%, but for the statistical purposes you mention, it should be plenty. While it is true that abstinence has a higher rate of pregnancy prevention than condom use, _teaching_ abstinence has a way lower rate of preventing pregnancy and STDs than _teaching_ contraception use. There are also other lines of thought, though. For instance, the type of human connection many seek through sexual encounters might be more easily attained through less promiscuous ones (without arguing marriage-only). This is a very troublesome topic in many ways, but I think progress can be made in it, to the benefit both of physical and mental well being.
It's the latest trend haven't you heard, knock one up, dump, replace, repeat. Wait, is feminism being blamed for single mothers!? Hahah, that is hilarious. Is the OP muslim or something. Just because women these days are trying to get comparable rights as men, they are under different circumstances like maternal bond, pregnancy etc, doesn't mean its bad - it just means things cannot be equal to achieve equality. It's not feminism vs islamic terrorism, its human rights versus islamic terrorism.
Sex Education, for 60 years now, has never sopped the appearance of bastard kids. The society always falls down, one after the next. Today, the whole world is one giant massive Pan-American economy which will fall down and total chaos will follow.
Think about the Facts though. One in every to births today is a bastard. These fatherless kids suffer enormous Child Abuse in the beginning: CHILDREN NEED BOTH PARENTS 63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes. (Source: U.S. D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census). 90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes. 85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes. (Source: Center for Disease Control). 80% of rapist motivated by displaced anger come from fatherless homes. (Source: Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 14, pp. 403-26). 71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes. (Source: National Principals A Report on the State of High Schools). 85% of all youths sitting in prisons grew up in a fatherless home. (Source: Fulton County Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. Of Corrections, 1992). These statistics translate to mean that children from fatherless homes are: 5 times more likely to commit suicide 32 times more likely to run away 20 times more likely to have behavioral disorders 14 times more likely to commit rape 9 times more likely to drop out of high school 20 times more likely to end up in prison Children from "fatherless families of single mother" homes are*: 15.3 times more likely to have behavioral disorders 4.6 times more likely to commit suicide 6.6 times more likely to become teenaged mothers 24.3 times more likely to run away 15.3 times more likely to have behavioral disorders 6.3 times more likely to be in a state-operated institutions 10.8 times more likely to commit rape 6.6 times more likely to drop out of school 15.3 times more likely to end up in prison while a teenage 73% of adolescent murderers come from mother only homes Daughters who live in mother only homes are 92% more likely to divorce** /// http://www.cato.org/publications/con...-state-crime-0 This requires a Welfare System of $1 Trillion dollars today. Then, as adults, they commit 70% of all violent crimes.
Well at least we won't have to listen to you go on and on and on and on and on and on and on.................... about bastards!
Nor has abstinence. If you read into my post that sex education eliminates fatherless children, then I urge you to reread it. I'm simply comparing it to other methods, which would also fail to eliminate fatherless children, and in many cases more spectacularly. I struggle to see what the last to lines of your post have to do with anything.
If you notice, Cupid Dave AGREES with radical Islam on the idea of controlling and dominating women..... while supposedly being opposed to radical Islam.
Personally for me, I've been screwed over by more white religious guys in suits than any bastards, so I think this is your fear not mine!
"Bastards" are not what Cupid Dave fears....if you want, I can PM you and tell you the group he has REAL fear of ...and hatred for.
Feminism versus terrorism? are you implying that the children raised will be terrorists because of feminism? this makes no sense because feminism has to do with the empowerment of women to meet life head on, and terrorism is about action due to stress or stone walling, or, a lack of cooperation. As a society, aborting children is good if you cannot support them, as they will suffer. any born child raised in the right environment will become the product of the environment due to the resources at their disposal - human, finance and learning of course, among others. this holds society together, as there are not too many avenues for people to find these resources ~ point for abortion. Abortion is wrong because they will deny someone a right to life. what would they do with this life? experience things and take - everybody takes - will they give back? needs are sometimes satisfied by the needs of others, this is called a relationship, or 'barter,' yes? if you would abort a child you would remove from the essence of the world, and, deny a child that freedom they deserve. if the parents want to give their child no right to life, it is the choice of the parents and not the child. as living things form, they will be given a chance, a chance taken away by the society that is responsible for them. this would deny the world another tax payer, yes? If you were to look at it from a neutral standpoint, the aborted child could be the next mandela! what do you have to say to that? he might get out of jail and forgive everyone and do something anyone else could do!
Nah,... I am not opposed to radical Islam. They are doing exactly what the Jews did originally. But it doesn't work. The Jews saw this when Christ taught them that only the Truth can set them free of these matriarchies that hurt society, children, and men. The truth can set men free of the whoredom they tend to build up, as they work for money to throw at the harlots who sexually accommodate them. I am for what works.
No, because I said these people believe in using force, like Malcolm X wanted to do. But Rev Martin Luther King demonstrated that natural, honest, real change can only come from the heart.
Ann is a writer and educated woman. She contributes to the society in a very radical way. But she is a Feminist too. She is 54, never been married, and like so many feminists, holds down the legitimate birth rate because her "business" was too important to interrupt. In the meantime her sister feminists in poverty manage to have Welfare bastards instead of two parent families. What we see these women doing is destroying the society by manipulating the birth rates this way.
I believe in the idea of amnesty for those feminists who have put down roots and done this here, even though sometime back they may have thought it was good. An honest discussion with Ann would likely get her to see that the massive movement of women to feminism has doubled the Unskilled Labor Market, hurt wages, replaced men who were hard to get into working, and eliminated mothers at home with and with out husbands. All bad.
