Homosexual AND Bisexual Men Represent Only 2% of the USA Population.

Why has the homosexualist lobby lied about 10%?

Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, homosexual authors of the influential propaganda "Homosexual Agenda" 1989 book "After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear & Hatred of Gays in 90s" relying on Kinsey’s fraudulent estimates, demonstrate how the propaganda lie was used for public relations purposes:

"If we must…pick a specific percentage for propaganda purposes, we may as well stick with the solidly conservative figure suggested by Kinsey decades ago: taking men and women together, at least 10% of the populace has demonstrated its homosexual proclivities so extensively that the proportion may reasonably be called ‘gay.’….

Straights do not appreciate that, with at least one-tenth of the public extensively involved in it, the practice of homosexuality may be a more commonplace activity in America than, say, bowling (6%), jogging (7%), golfing (5%), hunting (6%), reading drugstore romance novels (9%), or ballroom dancing (2%) on a regular basis. (Ballroom dancing—not that’s abnormal.)…

You should grasp clearly why America’s persistent underestimation of the number of homosexuals in its citizenry and core institutions is so dangerous to the cause of civil rights….Literally, the more the better. As Kinsey, Pomeroy, and Martin explain dryly in their classic study, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male

“To those who believe, as children do, that conformance should be universal, any departure from the rule becomes immorality. The immorality seems particularly gross to an individual who is unaware of the frequency with which exceptions to the supposed rule actually occur.”

Thus, when it comes to fighting the charge that homosexuality is statistically abnormal hence immoral, there is strength in numbers." [pp. 16-17, ]

Opinions?

 

There are conflicting statistics based on different studies. Why does it matter?

 

You would have to ask the serial exaggerators as to why they do it, and those that conduct the studies why it matters to them I suppose. I can't speak for them.

 

But why does it matter to you whether 4% or 10% of the US population is gay?

 

The number I see most often is that about 5-6% of Americans are gays and lesbians. Still don't understand why it matters to you. IS there a point you are trying to make?

 

The ones that only exist in your mind? We can't they aren't real.

 

That's odd, I quoted some of the serial exaggerators right in the OP. Is it your contention that Marshal Kirk and Hunter Madsen only exist in my mind, that they were not real people, and they were not homosexual political advocates? If so, cite your sources and facts or concede.

 

No you didn't. I don't trust you. You must provide links. If you had not stolen intellectual property and attempted to pass it off as something else I would have little reason to distrust you. But those were your actions. They speak louder than your words.

If you are going to claim things occurred you must sight them with more than your words. You are a confirmed plagiarist. That is your fault your choice and your burden.

 

Here is a link to overhauling Straight America: http://library.gayhomeland.org/0018/EN/EN_Overhauling_Straight.htm

And here is one to After the Ball.... http://www.amazon.com/After-Ball-America-Conquer-Hatred/dp/0452264987

Now concede

 

The only one with an agenda here is you.

 

No, you are still a plagiarist. You should have linked that work in the op.

The fact that you practiced this deception to conceal the truth indicates your goal and that is specifically to conceal the truth.

This is why your side of things continually lose in case after case. You must conceal the truth. You have done it every other clown that posted this nonsense before you has done it. I'm getting really good at debunking this nonsense.

Because you rely on distortion of facts manipulation and dishonesty you have no credibility.

Please never stop posting threads and responses you do more to support my argument than I ever could. Why do you think I respond to every one of your posts? I want you too keep talking.

See I'm completely honest. That's why I have more credibility.

 

To bully, bash, harass, vilify and flamebait people who post homosexual authored articles you don't like.

 

I was hoping you'd say that. So I'm a big meanie because I point out flaws in your arguments?

That's logical.

 

The gay community wants to make it appear that they are a high percentage of the population for political purposes. Every group likes to appear that they have more votes than they really do.

 

Except it isn't the case. I'm not sure who decided that the 10% estimate was accurate but it isn't the truth and not a single poster has said that it was aside from the ironicly named voice of sanity.

So clearly this is political propaganda form the people hijacking conservatism.

 

True, but the homoseuxal lobby just needs to admit they are lying about 10%.

 

It is 2%.

No,10%.


Maybe. Unless one counts drunken escapades or Marines, then it may be higher.

In short, who cares? Does it matter?

 

Apparently the Homosexual Lobby does, and it seems to matter to them, and they admit why. See After The Ball... previously cited. They just can't be trusted to ever be truthful.

 

The homosexual lobby started this thread?

I don't understand why anyone gives a shifting there are 4% or 6%. Does it matter?

 

Considering the original post stats are also referenced by the CDC, it appears the only flawed argument is yours. You're very illogical and you continue to fail to cite your sources because, well, you have no argument, only bullying.

- - - Updated - - -

 

The 10% figure was based off of Kensey's research.

The National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal) revealed that in 2010, about 8% of 16- to 44-year-old men reported having had a same-sex experience: this is higher than in 1990, possibly associated with both better reporting and the decline in fear of HIV, there have been no substantial recent changes.

It look as if the 10% figure may be understated once you account for lesbian and bisexual women. I agree the 10% figure should be abandoned, 15% to 20% seems more appropriate accounting for all individuals to have same sex attractions.

 

Well, now that's odd, even current homosexual lobby organizations admit that homosexuals represent less than 5%. The CDC says its 4% (1), and the National Health Institute reports more accurate figures published by the Williams Institute estimated that 1.7 percent as homosexual.(2)

1- http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html

2-Gates, Gary J. (April 2011). "How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender?". Williams Institute, University of California School of Law.

 

1/3rd of American youth identify as bisexual.
http://www.advocate.com/bisexuality...ish-young-adults-not-100-percent-heterosexual

49% of UK youth identify as bisexual.
http://www.advocate.com/bisexuality...rican-young-adults-identify-bisexual-spectrum

This indicates 2 realities. First, older people are conditioned to keep their sexual orientation private if not hetero. Second, it represents growing sexual freedom and liberation among the young.

 

The Advocate....lol. The so called "study" didn't say half were bisexual as claimed, it said "As many as", which would never withstand peer review. How about "as little as" figures, which should also be rejected. What it said was : "adults aged 18-24 described themselves as "not 100 percent heterosexual," How one draws a conclusion that not 100% heterosexual means definately bisexual is comical.

The so called "study" also used "Kinsey's scale", a 40's and 50's bisexual "researcher" long since discredited by peers for fraud and for refusing to open up his methodology to peer review. Kinsey the disgusting pervert monster also oversaw child molestation where he asked homosexual child molesters to homosexually attack underage children and report how long it took the children to be brought to orgasm and describe it. Sick monsters.

 

Yours links post a question of self identification while mine references prior actions.
Which has more real world validity?