There is one thing i like about her and that is that she doesnt seem like a pushover, unlike Bernie Sanders. Also although she may be a liar she does seem to be competent to do a job when she decides on it. And also the fact that Bernie supporters mostly are like angry children in most cases [video=youtube;cqgOgK9Eyng]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqgOgK9Eyng[/video]
I have to take issue with the competence part. She simply couldn't tell the difference between classified and unclassified material on her server.
And exactly like Angela Merkel, she will bring millions of Syrian and Middle Easterners to mix and mingle with us. Who will in turn demand their rights and use the liberal media to create Sharia Law zones and US citizen "No-Go" zones as they are doing in Europe.
the nice thing about clinton is she realizes that america is more than just the population centers. For example Sanders wants a 15$ wage across the country. That may work in New York and California but it would destroy other areas. So she compromises with 12 then others can go up. She still mandates a higher wage while setting up conditions which lower the wage so it will still fail unlike trumps policies but it will fail less spectacularly than sanders.
She sure didn't seem that nice toppling the Libyan regime. How'd that work out, anyway? Ah, the nice perks of Sec. of State. You win some, you lose some. In her case she lost the whole thing but who's counting?
Hillary Clinton stands by her defense of 1975 rape suspect ... www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-stands-by-her...
I know, I was trying to play on that. Guess it didn't come through teh internetz. - - - Updated - - - Seems like a nice lady. - - - Updated - - - They certainly do believe in fairytales.
Thanks. You must've known that JLaw is my fave. I loved her in SLP and AH. So back on topic, do the right wing trolls at PF really think Hillary is all that bad? I think they are just doing schtick to impress their net buddies.
Is she competent? I would have to say yes on the evidence. * Bill and Hillary Clinton planned and executed a hostile takeover of the Democratic party. They have utterly transformed it from its traditional New Deal coalition into a corporatist center-right behemoth. * Hillary is by far the most hawkish candidate of anyone running for President since Bush II. I would argue that she is fundamentally more hawkish than Bush, who was largely guided by Cheney. Clinton, in contrast, has been at the center of neo-conservative ideology for decades, and it is fundamental to her core beliefs. All the usual neo-con suspects now orbit her, like moths around a naked bulb. * Clinton competently helped create the prison industrial complex. It now houses more prisoners (as a percentage of the population) than previous champs like the Soviet Union and South Africa. * Clinton competently assisted in the financialization of the US economy through supporting the repeal of Glass-Steagal and preventing the regulation of derivatives. * Clinton forcefully advocated the destabilization of the Libyan state, and actively guided this policy in her role of Secretary of State. She helped create the chaos into which stepped the Islamic State. * Clinton directed the destabilization of Ukraine. She approved CIA funding of neo-nazi elements, and helped engineer the overthrow of Yanukovych. Eastern Ukraine is now effectively part of the Russian Confederation, and Ukraine proper is a failed state. * Clinton advocated and helped direct covert violence in Honduras and Haiti. So yes, Clinton is competent at certain things. The things she is competent at are what I have opposed my entire life. After 40 years of support, the Democratic Party is a lost cause for me.
Name a war or military action she opposed, that she didn't first support. Name a time when she screwed up, where she told the truth, simply because it was the truth? She is a fat corrupt little war monger sold out to whoever fills her coffers with cash. And, she is unappealing. And once she secures the nomination, there is no way you folks are going to get out of her candidacy. You think the evil stepmother's face lit up when she tricked Snowwhite into swallowing the poisoned apple... you aint seen nothing like the look that will be on Hillary's face when she secures the nomination.
So since she is a liar how do you know she is not lying to people when she's stumping and making all those promises? Or didn't that cross your mind? LOL
In defense of Hillary, she does represent the establishment. If she wins, there will be no big changes. You'll still have your wars in the middle east that never get won, you'll still have bankers pulling the strings, and everybody else in congress will play the party line either agreeing or disagreeing with her, but secretly it's a done deal and what she wants is what they want because the bankers want it. They're all bought and paid for, so why not have a president that is owned along with everybody else?
I will give you props for studying the situation and coming to a conclusion. To me she is the worst traits of all parties, and all politics combined.
If you believe being an accomplished liar with no ethics or morals qualifies someone to hold high office then you should vote for her. She will deliver more of the same agenda of screwing the people for the benefit of the .01% and expanding the tyrannical state making slaves and impoverishing the masses.
Speaking of a defense for Hillary-lets hear it... [video=youtube;-dY77j6uBHI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI[/video]