U.S. Foreign Policy: Spread Homosexual Agenda

What value has "normal" and "deviant". Being left handed is deviant.

Hell, in the Western world, opposing gay rights is deviant.

 

We should be sending more gay ambassadors to Islamic countries.

 

Why is it so hard for you cons to have a standard and to stand by it?

If a gay man kisses his boyfriend in a movie, it's "gay lifestyle advertising".

If a straight man kisses his girlfriend in the movie, "oh that's just a normal relationship."

(*)(*)(*)(*) that. You don't get to have it both ways. Stop being a hypocrite. Have a standard and (*)(*)(*)(*)ing stick with it. Either both are "advertising" or neither are.

 

Posting 23,000 replies in a web site is an abnormal use of time - could be considered deviant and harmful behavior by many health professionals - yet, there you are, shoving
it in my face every time you post ... setting a poor example for the rest of society ...

 

Oddly enough we don't see left handed organizations demanding more pro-left handedness in US foreign policy, that sort of stupidity only seems to spawn from the sexual deviants that demand everyone accept them at the barrel of the government gun because they are far too lazy or out of touch to actually convince anyone through diplomatic means to accept them...

Only in trashy liberal circles is support for the deviants seen as anything other than a social disaster waiting to happen, and now it is leeching into policy matters where it doesn't belong...

 

In comparison to what? Do you have some relevant data as to what would be the normal use of my time? You come here of your own volition, nobody forces posts down your throat, if you can't understand that, you are in the wrong place. I'll not bother with you again, that is why ignore exists...

 

Wow. What a steaming pantsload.

A. The US exports plenty.
B. The US is not 'exporting subversion and perversion'
C. There is no homosexual agenda

If you have to start out based on false premises, you should expect to be taken seriously.

 

There is no point because everyone knows that's the normal lifestyle, it would be like advertising that grass grows.

But if someone did try to advertise the hetero lifestyle they'd be called a bigot, hater and a homophobe. You do recall what happened when a group of college students tried to promote straight pride day? The only people who are allowed to have pride are the LGBTers, minorities and Muslims, everyone else is supposed to feel shame and guilt for not belonging to one of those groups.

 

And yet you have no problem bi**ching and moaning about what others do with their time ... nobody is forcing you to be gay (though many are trying to force people NOT to be gay), if you can't understand that, you are on the wrong planet.

 

So what? Two gay students kissing on the Quad on campus are "advertising", yet two heterosexual couples doing exactly the same thing are ... what? Dude, there are some issues
you need to deal with in your life.

 

Except by the standards of what you guys consider "advertising" for the gay lifestyle, the Hetero lifestyle is advertised all over the place. And none of that bull(*)(*)(*)(*) you've claimed would happen does.

 

Not their time, their immoral and decidedly anti-American attempt to force America to accept their deviancy through either the judiciary or other means that completely bypass the people. You confuse me with someone else you apparently don't understand, I have never said anyone shouldn't be gay or whatever, I just don't want to be forced to endure hearing or seeing it because some unelected judge says I should. I am not what's wrong with this planet, unless you're one of those weirdos that hates humans and thinks we need to return to the Earth mother or whatnot, it would be those that choose a lifestyle that would destroy the species with the inability to procreate that would destroy the planet, simple science stuff really... Clearly you are a waste of my time, I'm putting you on ignore now...

 

Being normal is advertising?

 

If you aren't a hypocrite yes. If you are going to have a standard for "advertising" it has to apply evenly. Otherwise, just admit to being a hypocrite who wants special standards to apply to Heteros and you are fine.

 

Its not like makes any difference, if its actually true, which i doubt.

 

I can understand that you don't like when someone holds a mirror to your hypocrisy. Ignoring the truth seems to be your only option.

 

So our resident homosexual current events shouter is upset gay people exist in the world. . . I thought this was supposed to be current events, that shtick is pretty old.

 

Do me a favor and stop with the hypocrite talk and treating people equally. If you really wanted people treated equally you wouldn't let men in the girls room, but you do because that's not the kind of equal that helps your cause.

 

I don't support letting men in the girl's room. I support letting women use the girl's room.

And yes, on this issue, you are showing pure hypocrisy. Just own it. Either have a standard or don't.

 

Maybe. Honestly I'm not sure what the goals are... if the goal is to not offend the country, then no. But if the goal is to promote desired change in human rights up to the extent that it can be tolerated legally and safely for the individuals involved, then maybe yes. It comes down to the different goals that are at the heart of interacting with these various countries.

 

is that the goal of an ambassador to a foreign nation, to push your personal agenda?

 

What's a 'sexual lifestyle'? Please explain this term.

 

You mean you believe that being gay is in the genes but they should hide it?

 

You asked about the administration and why the administration would do it, not why a person should. As a person hired to do a job by the administration, you should do that job. If the ambassador acted against the wishes of the administration, then that is cause for concern on the ambassador's part.

 

Hopefully our agencies will soon be freed up from this excessive PC bs.