Gingrich- Trump's remarks about judge a "mistake", "inexcusable"

Here is the FULL quotation that Tr(oll)mp's supporters are disingenuously misrepresenting;

https://www.mediamatters.org/resear...-comparison-sotomayor-s-call-diversity/210763

There is nothing even remotely similar to Tr(oll)mp's bigotry in what Sottomayor said.

Furthermore Tr(oll)mp has a long and sordid track record of scams and being held accountable for this one by the Law of the Land is way overdue. He is going to be defending himself in NY State on the same fraud charges and he can't accuse that prosecutor of being "Mexican".

 

Gingrich is a "liberal"!

 

You'll have noticed that whenever Trump loses a point, feels insecure or not in control he starts crying like a baby, attacking all and sundry and blaming everyone but himself. The word 'sociopath' springs to mind for some reason...
Check this out-anything sound familiar? http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html

 

Yet another of the show business performer's habitual whiny tantrumps isn't going to work.

With latest racist sniveling, Republicans have had enough. (Meanwhile, his neo-nazi and other white supremacist endorsers don't seem to have a problem with it.)

 

There is nothing racist with calling a Mexican a Mexican.. That is not "defending" anything its common sense.

A biased judged should be recused.. again common sense. He has already leaked information but of course you dont care about that because the word Mexican was used omg the horror!

 

what trump said is pure bigotry and he has a history of that

the funny part is that some high-profile republicans are saying that it is racist

 

Lmao so apparently all this time, people who don't like trump are racist.

I mean they have been saying that Mexicans don't like Trump because of his wall... He just confirmed it.

 

Very good; now perhaps you might explain why Trump both chose to emphasize the judge's nationality and in virtually the same breath suggested that he would get the same 'biased' treatment from a Muslim judge. Paranoia, pique, racism? All of the above? You choose.

 

people who don't like trump are intelligent

 

I would extend that to suggest that those who don't like Trump feel a greater love for the integrity and standing of their country than the ignorant, racist goon who is hell-bent on nothing less than self-aggrandizement, self-promotion and, basically, self.

 

Apparently they are with their own logic. Though it confuses me a bit. I haven't said he's a racist and I hate Trump. Hopefully his hairpiece does its magic and slides down his face in the middle of the night.

But thanks for calling me intelligent.

 

Trump exposes yet again the cowardice of the GOP establishment and the hypocrisy of libs and progs.

There is a mountain of research and daily examples regarding how judges are racially bias. It just all happens to be about "white" judges.

This judge in all likelihood is bias against Trump because Trump wants to build a wall, and this judge is of Mexican heritage.

It works both ways. Trump is right.

Again.

 

Yup. Couldn't believe that racialist turd that fell out of her mouth. We have no place for those kind of attitudes on the Federal bench.

 

if you were up on things, you'd know that trump doesn't have a hairpiece, he has a combover

 

Hardly im not gentle little snow flake as someone calling me Irish or Sicilian wouldnt make me blink nevermind cry in outrage.

- - - Updated - - -

Perhaps because of the false "Ban all Muslims" talking point your lovely media pushed...

 

He did NOT leak information. He released information to the public that had no logical or legal reason to be under seal. You can keep claiming that you are only calling a Mexican a Mexican but if you are defending Trump statements while trying to say you are not. That is dishonest and also wanting to have your cake and eat it too. To suggest that a person's heritage is viable means to disqualify them from a case is RACIST. To suggest that because he belongs to a group of lawyers sanctioned by the Bar Association is reason to disqualify him from a case is asinine. Again, ad nauseum, by that idiotic standard any judge belonging to a Catholic Parish would have to recuse themselves from all abortion cases. Any judge that belongs to evangelical church would have to recuse themselves from any case involving homosexual rights. That is just asinine.

 

You insisting its racist does not make it racist... And that was a partial quote.. I posted the entire quote the rest of which you ignored just to keep repeat the same nonsense.

Btw

But Curiel said he “mistakenly” listed some of the documents to be released in full, when they should have been edited to delete personal information, Politico reported.

Curiel told Trump’s lawyers to file redacted copies by Thursday so they can be made public again.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...-trump-university-case-reseals-some-documents

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/06/trump-university-documents-resealed-223783

https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-tr...seals-records-191111345--election.html?ref=gs

Ooops a *mistake*

 

Again that is not a leak. The redacted portions of the documents are only to remove identifying comments or comments that reveal personal information. This happens all the time. It is not a leak. To suggest it is is to be dishonest.

I am not the only one saying it is racist. Half or more of the Republican's that endorsed him are saying it. All major news outlets are saying it...why...because it obviously is RACIST. If you think a person's ethnicity disqualifies them from doing there job that is the definition of racism. You can try to qualify it all you want and run rings around yourself trying to defend but in the final analysis the comments are racist. This is not the first time Trump has made obviously racist statements. He has also been found guilty of racial discrimination in a court once and by an administrative law judge once. So we have person who is known to practice racial discrimination, makes multiple racist statements and I am not to believe he is a racist. You strain credulity.

 

that gibberish doesn't change the valid assertion that i made

 

I can see you calling the truth Gibberish and nothing else.

- - - Updated - - -

And yet he called for them to be resealed and then redacted.... it was a "mistake".. Nice spinning.. Information that was released should not have been... If that sounds better to you then the word leak then so be it.

 

Looking at the backlash BY REPUBLICANS against Trump's racist dog-whistle against Judge Curiel........Gingrich calling it "inexcusable", Ryan calling it "textbook racism", Senate Repubs "un-endorsing" Trump.....


What sane, ambitious Republican will now want to accept Trump's Vice-Presidential nomination?

 

your entire statement is an excuse for bad behavior

and this is a double-negative, it's equivocal at best

"Hardly I'm not…"

 

They are if their race and ideology dictate their judgment, and that is clearly the case with the judge on the Trump University case. He is clearly a Hispanic activist, not a judge who just happens to be Hispanic.

 

You are the one spinning. It was NOT A LEAK. You either do not know the definition of the term leak or you are showing willful ignorance.

 

So why haven't Trump's LAWYERS filed for a recusal?