Bill O'Reilly takes stunning stance on guns after Orlando massacre

No-Fly-No-Buy.

 

I agree with O'Reilly, lets ban tanks, bazooka's and hand grenades!

 

Just a few months ago, all the "progressives" were cheering that the man they hate - Bill O'Reilly - had falling ratings and he was now irrelevant.

Now that he uttered a little bit that you can twist and falsely expand into gun control (did you even hear his entire presentation? It wasn't so anti-gun rights as you think) O'Reilly is suddenly your hero.

Just like the Pope. "progressives" hated the Pope for 20 years, then one day he utters something that can be twisted into being pro-LGBT and the progs think everyone should obey the Pope.

Hypocrites.

 

`
Huh????? (scratches head) what are you talking about? When you figure that out, let me know.

 

Then read it again.

I'll help you. How often do you hold up Bill O'Reilly or Fox News as a model of public policy? How often do you ridicule Fox and everything associated with it?

But then O'Reilly says something that sounds like gun control and O'Reilly is your new best friend, you and your gun banner buddies jump all over it and pretend like O'Reilly is the wisest man on earth and we should lay down and obey him.

Just like the LGBTs did with the Pope. They hate the Pope and everything he is about until he came to the USA a few months ago and seemed to utter something that sounded like he supported the LGBT lifestyle (he didn't). Then he was the LGBTs new best friend and they wanted everyone to listen to the Pope.

Propaganda, that's all that comes out of the progs and LGBTs mouths.

 

`
Oh, I see what your doing. You are playing a game called throw crap at the wall and see if it sticks. You start off with a fantasy or false assumptions that cannot be proven, then you construct your own fantasy scenario around it. Cute, in a juvenile way but a waste of time. Who said O'Reilly is a role model? How often do I talk about fox news? Gun banner buddies? Pope???? Where the hell did that come up? Take a rest. O'Reilly's statement is unusual, which is why it's news. Nothing more, nothing less.

 

You did not post about O'Reilly because what he said is unusual, and not because you hold him in any level or respect, you posted because a conservative leader (or what you consider to be a conservative leader) said something that might fit your agenda and at the same time stab other conservatives in the back.

 

He is wrong. In Israel armed teenagers with fully automatic weapon are everywhere and no problem with gun violence. Why? Because they don't have gun free zones there.

 

`
He's a news pundit, not a political leader, like Sean Hannity and Anne Coulter. I posted it because what he said is unusual, that's not his normal rhetoric. Considering that gun control is a hot topic, especially surrounding the events in Orlando, #!1 rated O'Reilly took a dramatic stand. What changed his mind? Why? Good areas for discussion.

 

I hate to be the one to give you this bad news but this is NOT the same pope as 20 years ago. The last one was a homophobe but this new pope even washed the feet of Muslim prisoners. He is not your typical pope at all. I am an atheist and I agree with what he is saying and doing to help people.

 

Sorry, he wasn't on it. And according to you, then due process under the law is now out the door. Here's a better law. NO MUSLIMS!.

 

The law is being changed to include anyone who was on the list for the last 5 years which means he would have been denied.

 

Lets hear it from a leftist. It's now OK to void due process or do you have a problem saying militant islamist too?

 

gangsters are the un or those want to take away your right to defend your self from there tanks..armored cars hellocopters

​

 

Non sequitur!

 

Or as it's called in the vernacular, dodging the question. Typical for a liberal though.

 

Spurious ad homs instead of substance?

Have a nice day!

 

Or you could just answer the question.

 

So what? So what if teens use? Since when is it the government's business what the public chooses to ingest?

They defacto modified the constitution when they installed alcohol prohibition. There have been no modifications to the constitution, however, for other ingestible items, just state mandates and unconstitutional laws and statutes.

The war on drugs is an illicit, illegal war, declared unconstitutionally, with unconstitutional laws, statutes and regulations forcing the public to regulate its consumption via state strong arming. Additionally, the continued restriction of free commerce, is idiotic. The state is making cartels more powerful by barring the individual liberty to produce substances of their choosing freely on their own property.

It's not your responsibility to protect the youth from consumables. That's between them and their parents. I don't give a (*)(*)(*)(*) what your statistics say. It's a constitutional issue; and not one our government has been legal on since the war on drugs began.

 

And I'm sorry to be the one to give you bad news but the current one is a "homophobe" as well. The current Pope stated the same policy regarding homosexuality and sin as previous Popes - that homosexual acts were sins but a homosexual was still redeemable. That's the policy for all people: no matter what the sin, the person is always redeemable by the grace of God.

In other words, the Pope stated that a homosexual person is fine, as long as they stop engaging in homosexual acts.

You should read what the Pope actually said, not the lying spin but on it by the LGBTs. The Popes comments are a perfect example of the propaganda of used by the progs and LGBTs.

 

it IS the responsibility of adults to protect anyone under age 18 from harming themselves, especially when those injuries can last an entire life... so this notion its okay for teens to get high and drugged up, is even more stupid than the "it never hurt anyone" argument... we have clear documented proof that drug use in teenagers harms their brains, just like alcohol consumption does, so we SHOULD prevent under aged people from potentially developing lifelong injuries... to even suggest this is some ridiculous argument and somehow teens get a "right" to get high and cause harm, is just pure stupidity on your part... you're trying to rationalize and justify your lost argument...

 

`
I would appreciate it if you would stop attributing me with things I didn't say. If you continue, I will complain. Thank you

 

What is homophobic about the following statements"

"If they accept the Lord and have goodwill, who am I to judge them?"

"Sometimes it happens that you feel disappointed, discouraged, abandoned by all: but God does not forget his children, he never abandons them! He is always at our side, especially in trying times."

"We have to find a way to help that father or that mother to stand by their [LGBTQ] son or daughter."

 

what post? this is a long thread

 

First, I put the word "homophobe" in quotes and used it only because you used it to describe the policy of the Catholic Church. The word "homophobe" is a word invented by the LGBT zealots as a way to shut down speech and ridicule people who do endorse the LGBT agenda.

Second, what you post is sparse sentences taken out of context. What is the actual policy behind those sentences? It is that homosexuality is a sin, sinful acts are to be condemned, but sinners can always find redemption.

That's the same policy that has always been in place.