Wikileaks' Assange Slams Media For Defending Demon Clinton, Who Will Put Nooses Around Everyones Necks By Matt Vespa Aug 31, 2016 Wikileaks Julian Assange is quite the character. Vilified by some, especially on the right, when he released a deluge of documents relating to the Iraq and Afghan warsall of this thanks to former Private First Class Chelsea Manning. Hes been in the news due to the mysterious circumstances surrounding the death of Seth Rich, who some have speculated was the leak in the recent Democratic National Committee email fiasco that pretty much forced the resignations of everyone at its executive level. We dont know who murdered Rich, but Assange has been cryptic in his suggestions that he could be the leak, and that he was murdered for it. Now, Assange is warning American media that Hillary Clinton is a demon, who will place nooses around our necks should she win the presidential election (via The Hill):[http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/293990-assange-press-helping-demon-clinton] The American liberal media is falling over themselves to defend Hillary Clinton, he told The New York Times during a Facebook video interview Wednesday. [They are] erecting a demon who is going to put nooses around everyones necks as soon as she wins this election, which she is almost certainly going to do. Assange, whose organization released internal emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) believed to have been stolen by Russia, said it is particularly troubling that the Democrat's campaign has linked her critics to Russia. [Its] that attempted reframing by Hillary Clinton, to declare media organizations that are publishing material that shows illicit behavior in the [Democratic National Committee] to fix the election for her, as somehow being Russian agents, he said. Her campaign has effectively called, or maybe even directly called Donald Trump, the opposition leader in this case, a Russian agent, Assange added of the GOPs presidential nominee. Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, the fourth candidate effectively in terms of numbers, has also been called a Russian agent. This is a neo-McCarthyist hysteria. In July, The Intercepts Glenn Greenwald, who broke the story of the National Security Agencys activities due to information obtained by Edward Snowden, also acknowledged that the American media is 100 percent against Trump in an interview with Slate[http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...rump_the_dnc_hack_and_a_new_mccarthyism.html]. Hes okay with that since he feels that Trumps positions are dangerous. Yet, hes also unwilling to go along with every fact-free slander out there against the man, namely that hes a traitor who called on Russia to hack into Clintons email server: OK, so, I am glad you asked about that because this is the conflict that I am currently having: The U.S. media is essentially 100 percent united, vehemently, against Trump, and preventing him from being elected president. I dont have an actual problem with that because I share the premises on which it is based about why he poses such extreme dangers. But that doesnt mean that as a journalist, or even just as a citizen, that I am willing to go along with any claim, no matter how fact-free, no matter how irrational, no matter how dangerous it could be, in order to bring Trump down. So, literally, the lead story in the New York Times today suggests, and other people have similarly suggested it, that Trump was literally putting in a request to Putin for the Russians to cyber attack the FBI, the United States government, or get Hillary Clintons emails. That is such unmitigated bull(*)(*)(*)(*). What that was an offhanded, trolling comment designed to make some kind of snide reference to the need to find Hillarys emails. He wasnt directing the Russians, in some genuine, literal way, to go on some cyber mission to find Hillarys emails. If he wanted to request the Russians to do that, why would he do it in some offhanded way in a press conference? It was a stupid, reckless comment that he made elevated into treason. (Excerpt) Read more: http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...ll-put-nooses-around-everyones-necks-n2212642 Assange needs Trump to win. Hillary will not be forgiving if she wins, Julian can expect the full Vince Foster Treatment. Like in the movie Analyze this "He committed suicide... shot himself in the back four times and threw himself off a building". There's already been a failed attack. the next one will be a mysterious explosion destroying the Embassy. Hillary is hiding, she has not had a public appearance, at least from what I see on the web, for a few weeks while Trump is all over the place, now he is in Mexico, he was in LA to show support for the victims of the flood while Hillary did not even show up, she is either sick or tired or both. Hopefully whatever information Assange has will be enough help the anti Trump republicans see how important it is to stop hillary from ever becoming president. Either vote for Trump or give the election to hillary. Trump needs every vote he can get. We'll all be sorry once hillary puts that noose around our necks but by then it will be too late.
The media isn't trying to defend Hillary anymore. They stopped that the week following Trump's very positive GOP convention. Ever since then the media seems to have realized that they were giving Trump billions in free advertising and so switched to a different strategy: simply don't discuss Clinton for any reason. Focus all the criticism on Trump and hope something sticks and people forget about the alternative. Australian coverage of anything American is unilaterally DNC talking points. Nothing else. The far-left of the Democrats too: the regressive left.
Seems the Progressive Socialists are so into the need for power they will back thieves, criminals and disloyal treasonous Americans.
Assange is a closet Trump supporter lol as anyone should be given that it's him or Clinton and absolutely no Third Party will win. The bias in the media is unrelenting as Trump is 'racist' and a 'sexist' and Hillary has so much experience and is a women. Trump isn't the President America wants, but he may be the President America needs at this time. I live in Australia and I know Clinton will drag us into more stalemate wars. Trump is necessary because we need to kick this PC garbage to the curb for good, and I still haven't really heard him say anything that is as bad as what leftist would have you believe. As a formally leftist Australian, it's been my position for years that America needs to stop meddling with the borders and people and other countries, and instead focus on its own borders and people. Trump suggests the same (why oh why didn't you Americans just elect Ron Paul..) and all of the sudden all the leftists are at his throat lol call Trump racist all you want but he didn't destroy Muslim countries and their people, like Clinton..
Based on your uninformed post, your own political bias hurts your ability to argue points. Assange has stated clearly the reason he is going to make the email dump against Hillary before the election. He is doing it because he believes the media is NOT unbiased. Assange doesn't actually like Trump either. Quoting Assange on FOX (Aug 26), "I'd like to believe that no media organization would not publish the DNC emails," Assange told Fox News' "The Kelly File". "[But] I think MSNBC wouldn't publish [nor would] The New York Times ... That's sad." So Assange plans to make sure the people, the voters can make informed decisions in the upcoming election. Don't you think it's about time you started thinking for YOURSELF instead of parroting what the media and democrats want you to know? Steve
lolwut, was that post aimed at me? lol my post was the opposite to any media and democrat talking points? Assange says he doesn't like Trump but I think he prefers the idea of a Trump presidency over a Clinton one.
I can definitely see where you TRIED to sound like you were against the media propaganda, HOWEVER, your statement, "(why oh why didn't you Americans just elect Ron Paul..)" tells me that you are on the fence between being anti-Hillary and anti-Trump. That is what the media is attempting to accomplish, is to muddy the differences between Clinton and Trump. The viable choices in OUR election is either Trump or Clinton. Trump has done nothing even REMOTELY COMPARABLE to Hillary's crimes. I respect Assange's integrity even though I was previously against the Wikileaks causing the deaths in the past, potential and real. Besides, Ron Paul wasn't a candidate in the 2016 primary, and apparently you are not a U.S. citizen anyway, right? Steve
Why do people care about the opinions of an Australian computer-programmer-turned-criminal who spends his time dodging authorities? The more he opposes Hillary the more I think maybe she isn't so bad.
