I believe that there should be a Traditionalist, oligarchical, sector-based Meritocratic system. In less confusing vernacular, I believe the system should be ruled over by a oligarchical committee that is selected based on certain objective testing. Furthermore, government should be structured into three "sectors": "Unskilled Labor Party", "Skilled Labor Party", and "Highly Skilled Labor Party". Each party will have representatives from their designated demographic of citizens, but also a representative from the ruling committee. The education system will also be divided in the same manner, except all sectors will be combined through junior high, where testing will determine which party the student belongs in. While this is still a rough draft, I believe this is the proper foundation for a meritocratic government. ~Cynic
Look at the U.S. as of now. No one is pleased, and inequality is seen as a major issue for everyone. This belief is pushing people to want to accept socialism in America, which (In my opinion) will force us into a time of economic disparity and even greater inequality, along with lesser rights. Meritocracy is a perfect blend of capitalism and socialism, where everyone is given an equal chance to succeed. Hope this helps, and if you have anymore questions or comments, please post them. ~Cynic
I believe not. While the logistics are complex, the negatives outweigh the positives of the system. As to your other question, the government is very centralized out of necessity, and can be balanced out by a system of checks and balances, just as in the U.S. currently. Any criticisms, comments, or ideas would be greatly appreciated. ~Cynic
This is somewhat ridiculous. Do not insert your ideas for a dystopian novel into this forum, please. Now, I do support meritocracy. But I disagree with your implementation of the system. And, the labor classes will create inequality (which is okay) and resentment (which is not). This resentment will lead to class wars and general hatred amongst them, and possibly persecution by the Highly Skilled members. Finally, define "traditionalist".
After days of heavy research, I have come to the realization that my idea of meritocracy is ignorant, immature, and naive. The current American system is working well, in my opinion, and is offering many opportunities and freedoms. I would just like to rescind my support of my previous statements.
I believe the above is what Plato wanted (outlined the basic idea in the Republic, although with different details). He wanted to produce philosopher kings to rule. It's a nice idea, but it won't work in practice. People like their friends and family too much. 1