Powerful New Clinton Ad Nails The Impact Of Trump's Vile Behavior-

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-ad-mirrors_us_57e494f9e4b08d73b83098cd

Few quick predictions on responss from Trump supporters-

1. Half (or more) of them, won't actually watch the ad. (Or they may claim "link doesn't work"...an old stand-by.)

2. The other half will try to bring up Bill Clinton and the women "he's abused"....who oddly NONE of whom have ever gone to a District Attorney to file charges....but ALL of them did go to Rightwing Radio, Fox News, and ...book publishers.

3. None of the Trump supporters will actually attempt to defend what Trump said in those ads.....because they can't.

4. None will admit....but many will secretly know...the impact of that ad.

Not just on women voters who are mothers of daughters....but on MEN voters who are faithers of daughters as well. And both groups...include REPUBLICAN voters.

Sure it might not get them to vote for Hillary....but it could get them to vote Johnson or just leave the Presidential slot blank on their ballot.

 

That is because it is huffington post which is the print left wing media version of alex jones and full of crap.

The ad is stupid he made comments about individual women not women in general and that is irrelevant.

The ad in Huff post also states egregious lies stating he incites violence followed by the usual smears and lies of misogynist, racist etc etc etc.

More failure from the clinton camp

 

"individual women"? Hmmm....so if Trump called ONE black man the N-word...that wouldn't "count"?

 

how many millions did Jeb, Ted, and Marco drop into negative ads against Trump, and exactly how did that work out?

I live in a early voting state and for three weeks preceding the primary I would estimate at there were least 10 -15 anti Trump ads on every cable news station per hour. Trump won the state by 10 points against 4 very seasoned politicians and Carson. Cruz's vaunted ground game was out in force knockin on doors and he ended up a close third to Marco. Jeb was a distant 4th stuck in single digits and dropped out afterward

Please keep doing the same old thing over and over and hoping that it might work the next time. The TV people need the income

 

Actually no

 

there was a article the other day on how the over the top rhetoric against Trump was hurting the medias credibility more than it was hurting Trump. Going by the latest gallup poll on media credibility that does indeed seem to be the case, here is hoping that hillary shares that fate

 

That ad will not affect the mindless mob that would support any candidate the GOP selects. It will affect the millions of voters who may not otherwise vote. It is very powerful. Clinton has enough material on Trump to run ads like this on any number of subjects from here until the election. I will contribute today to help her fund them.

 

Those were in the PRIMARIES......Nobody is surprised a plurality of the Republican Party are "Trumpists".

This is a General Election....with Independents who will see those girls and hear/see Trump and how he talks about women and their appearances and bodies.

And as far as Jeb, Marco, Cruz?.....their supporters are still out there...debating how to vote...or IF to vote.

- - - Updated - - -

It wouldn't? Trump could use THE most heinous racial slur against "one" black man.....

and anybody who said it was indictative of his view of African-Americans would be "making a false accusation"???

- - - Updated - - -

Problem....the audio in that ad.....is Trump speaking. Not "the media"...not the girls in the ad...not Hillary.


It's all TRUMP.

 

She's been running these kind of out-of-context trash ads for some time now. If she thinks these comments are so hurtful to young girls, why is she running TV ads of them? Only someone as vile and repugnant as Hillary would do such a thing.

 

Trump is an absolutely disgusting human being. For him to make those comments publicly, whether directed at an individual or women in general, demonstrates a very poor attitude toward that gender. As usual he is revealed for what he is, by his own words.

 

1. What exactly was "out of context" about them? "He meant 'fat pig'...in a NICE way."???

2. Exposing a slimeball as a slimeball......his supporters say "You're exposing people to sliminess!!!"

 

What difference does it make now what Trump said about Rosie O'Donnell a few years ago? The big question is can Hillary appear lifelike during the two live debates with Trump. When her eyes start to cross and she's unsteady her handlers aren't going to be able to save her so easily.

 

so exactly how has that been working out since the primaries? Polls now are using weighting that would only be accurate if hillary has a turnout similar to what obama did in 2008 just to keep their donors happy. Disregarding that since 2008/2012 democrat registration is down and GOP registration is up and every excitement indicator shows that Trump has the motivation and the momentum at this point in the cycle. Only an idiot or a paid shill would try and pretend that hillary is going to get a better turnout than Trump.

 

Yes they would

 

Once again insulting one woman is not indicative of misogyny something left wingers fail to grasp.

And yes by comparison insulting one african american person with a racial slur is not evidence of racism.

As I recall the fat big comment was directed against Rosie Odonnell and quite accurate

 

Yup as he is equally hard on men whom oppose him. He treats men and women the same.

 

Democrats need to understand Hillary will lose.

 

Right now? Well....

Trump has NO polling that show him winning the requisite 270 Electoral College votes.

- - - Updated - - -

You just said Trump could call "one" black man the N-word and it wouldn't be indicative of racism.


And expect everybody to believe that.

- - - Updated - - -

Then why won't you directly predict a "Trump Landslide"...and let me save your post and the link?

 

Huffpo is blatantly leftist, but they don't peddle in ridiculous conspiracy theories the way that Alex Jones does. A better comparison would be Drudge Report.

Not the comment about whether or not he respects women. That was about women in general. He's made other comments about childcare being women's work. This, coupled with the way that he attacks the appearance of women every time he feels threatened by them . . . yeah, I don't know about racist, but he's definitely a sexist.

The ad in Huff post also states egregious lies stating he incites violence followed by the usual smears and lies of misogynist, racist etc etc etc.

More failure from the clinton camp[/QUOTE]

 

Keep in mind, this ad isn't aimed at changing the minds of the Trump supporters....

they support Trump even if nearly a quarter of them think he'll start a nuclear war.



This is aimed at those Independent and REPUBLICAN women AND men...who are still on the fence, debating if their dislike of Hillary is strong enough to get them to vote for a man they see as a buffoon and a bigot (or who panders to bigots) and is boorish.

And if they want their children growing up seeing a guy like him as President of the United States....or for the partisan Republicans, seen as the standard-bearer and Leader of their Party.

 

No I expect you to go on deluding yourself and ignoring fact. It is fact however insulting one person is not evidence of racism or islamophobia or misogyny or any other pet labeling that regressives love to use.

That is fact but lefties screech indignant denial of it.

 

[/QUOTE]

There is no evidence of sexism.

Stating that child care is woman's work may be over simplistic an insulting to some but in fact is accurate to a degree

 

you mean the polls that are weighted to assume hillary pulling Obama 2008 numbers out to vote? The ones designed and formulated to make her billionaire donors feel good polls so she can throw more of their money down the rathole of her campaign ?

 

No, I mean the polls that YOU guys on the Right have been citing for a week now when they show Trump "surging back" or even ahead somewhere.

That you then dismiss when they go against Trump.



- - - Updated - - -

Yes, SN......it's "us" who have the problem if we think a white man calling "just one" black man the N-word.....MIGHT be a racist.


We're so wacky that way.

 

Now your backpedaling and moving the goalpost.

No one said anything of who MIGHT be a racist. Indeed you MIGHT be.

The discussion thus far has been whether there is evidence of it and no there is not.

Insulting a person does not translate into racism or sexism or any other pet label regardless of the insult used. That is fact and so far you have been denying it.