It's a shame that we allow early voting. I don't know the percentage of voters who vote early. 25%? 50%? Whatever it is, it's a shame they voted without complete knowledge of the current political situation. In a perfect world, either we would not allow early voting or we would have it and allow people to change their vote.
Yes but that doesn't prevent them from telling friends and families how they feel used and abused over -- say -- what they found out about Hillary too late; meaning that those family members and friends who haven't already voted just might vote third party or even for Trump.
Then that's doubly unfair to absentee/military voters or people who go on vacation and stuff. Also, it would probably make very little difference, provided a war isn't declared (or a similar event) soon before election day
Not really. Early voting is very convenient. Even if I were registered an independent, was undecided, I still would have voted for Clinton. Early voting should be here to stay for all 50 states. Not everyone can make it to a voting location on November 8th, or whenever it usually falls.
Hillary is such a criminal, obviously so, a liar, and obviously so, a grifter, and obviously so, that if they threw away their vote on her, screw 'em. Remember when Marco Rubio drank some water while giving the Republican response to the presidents 2013 State of the Union address? Remember how CNN ran a picture of the Florida Senator taking his sip with a chyron reading: Career Ender? So can a drink of water make or break a political career? Wolf Blitzer asked. Politico ran more than one column discussing Rubios water thing. Most other major (read Democrat) news venues covered it too. So my question is this, if a drink of water threatens the career of a Republican, what happens when a former Democrat congressman makes sexual Twitter advances to a minor causing the FBI to seize the computer of his wife, the Democrat presidential candidates aide and a woman with ties to radical Islam, and the said computer is found to contain emails that potentially exposed classified information to our enemies so that said candidate could hide her likely influence peddling? Worse than a sip of water? Better? Im asking for a friend. https://pjmedia.com/andrewklavan/2016/10/30/reform-the-mainstream-news-media/
Lets see how you feel when you have to explain to the lord how you voted for partial birth abortion, wars, death and destruction. and the slavery of the working middle class? Personally I'd rather explain, I voted for a foul mouthed problem solver with a great family and a good heart, that saved our Country from the brink of imploding over jobs and corruption , rather then the person who voted For Hillary a candidate that legalized the killing of babies 5 minutes before birth, and started ww3 over stupidly backing a powerful Country into a corner, but that's just me.
If this were a perfect world, we could do a lot of things. But it's not, so we have to make do. Absentee voting makes sense. It lets people vote who may not be able to get to a voting station a chance to be heard.
early voting has its risks and its benefits, and each voter gets to choose whether the convenience or ability to vote at ALL is worth losing a week or twos information. Its the voters call, and the voters burden.
This election was rigged. Comey sabotaged Clinton by implying that she was under FBI investigation. Not only is she not under investigation but her emails have done no harm. Comey needs to be investigated. This could be a felony.
Do people who voted for Trump get to change there vote when the FBI releases the information about Trumps connection to Russia they have been sitting on? I'm sure that will come out tomorrow along with the possibility of Comey violating the Hatch Act. Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk
If Comey is violating the Hatch Act now, why wasn't it a violation when the investigation took place during the Democratic primaries? It's a weak charge with no evidence(You have to prove, ironically with intent that Comey did this to damage Clinton.) If you can't prove this, it's a baseless charge.
Don't even dignify their conscious, willful lies with a response mate. Just sit back and laugh. November 9 will be absolutely glorious. [hr][/hr] "However, Painter argues specific intent is not required because “the Hatch Act" and ethics rules are violated if it is obvious that the official’s actions could influence the election" LOL! You can't make this up!
What actual evidence could you possibly supply to,prove Trump has a good heart. Trump University, or his failure to pay his small contractors, or his Mexican slurs, or perhaps his statement about groping women, or the fact that he has cheated on all of his wives. Or perhaps his non existant donations to charity. And by the way prior to his trying to become the Republican candidate he was pro abortion and once elected will probably change back.
Hillary brokered a deal to sell 90% of available uranium to Russia we know that as 100% fact. you Hillary shills are non creative, all you ever do is take whatever she does and switch out her name with his. boring really. read up http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0
