Sad thing to watch Democrats challenge election results

So are all the Trump people claiming the election would be rigged, including Trump himself, as also equally "sad" to you?

I guess you just don't want the results audited, because, like all conservatives, you don't care about facts or truth, you only care about the republican party and place the party above the country.

 

if there is evidence, i would be the first to want a recount but 'gut feelings' and 'hunches' just because certain voting results look funny (and can be interpreted in different ways) is absolutely unacceptable. If we want to base things on gut feelings and a hunch, then what about all those who would have a 'gut feeling' or a 'hunch' that the democrats are looking to commit fraud during a recount, using tactics they have been planning all this time?

This 'gut feeling' game is endless and nonsense so without any evidence, everyone should stay quiet and Jill Stein raising 3mm for recounts is a disgrace.

 

The same thing happened in the democratic primaries against sanders. The democrats must have had particular areas in particular states that they had fraud going on, perhaps doing their own hacks to favor Clinton, and they were supposed to win. So since they did not, they think they won it, and got frauded out of it. After their fraud didn't work. LOL

 

Given that nothing is secure anyway, which is the first rule of IT security, it shouldn't be a surprise.

 

from Nate Silvers blog. Title says it all


Demographics, Not Hacking, Explain The Election Results

 

No problem with auditing. This is about the The hypocracy of the left saying the right would not except the results.

 

And even, NIXON, advocated other wise.

 

Be very careful because there are Russians everywhere in the USA. 60,000,000 of Putin's agents are in the USA who voted for Trump, plus everyone in the FBI is a Russian agent. Hilary and Bill Clinton, her campaign staff and the DNC also are all Russian agents, the reason she has not contested the election, plus Russia controls FOX and most of talk radio. You might be wise to flee the USA before the Russians get you.

 

I'm a solid Trump supporter but do believe the election results were altered via computers to give Trump the election by the powers-that-be. Hilary Clinton and her team were exposed as just too corrupt, too incompetent, and going to become so embroiled in the scandals and illegalities of the massive email collections plus the severe legal issues of the Clinton Foundation - combined with mental and physical health issues of Hilary plus her explosive temper and emotional instability. So I do believe it is very possible that because Trump was close enough on his own that the vote totals in the decisive rust belt states were altered enough to give Trump the victory.

However, for the liabilities Hilary Clinton won't pursue this in exchange for non-prosecution and a recount won't change anything because there would be no manner to remove fraudulent votes or unravel computer miscounting. There are too many electors for Trump to convince enough to go renegade. So regardless, it is a done-deal and Trump will become the next president - like it or not, fair or unfair. Reality is what it is.

 

Keeps them off the streets I guess.

 

Yes. They are pathetic. Meanwhile the rest of the sensible world is uniting around The Trumpster. Mexican Cement Company Volunteers to Help Build Donald Trump’s Great Border Wall.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...fd23&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter

 

I agree, an automatic recount of any results under the 1% margin would be a good idea.

Yes. And I assume voting machine issues won't apply to Michigan, which uses paper ballots. But count 'em again, just for good measure.

Yup. Sad, but educational.

Agreed.

 

Funny how GOP voters are suddenly pro Nate Silver after the hell they gave him when he (correctly) predicted Obama would beat Romney in 2012.

 

Clinton doesn't even have cahonas to do it herself. Jill Stein who had 2% of the vote is going to spend 2 million dollars to challenge the results??? She has nothing to gain in doing so. My local news just reported she received 4 million dollars in just 24hrs. I would be willing to bet that most of that money came from Hillary via a third party. If Jill Stein wanted Hillary to win then why did she run in the first place? She was taking votes away from Hillary. Now she is not happy with the results and wanting a recount.... this (*)(*)(*)(*) is hysterical.
In my experience when people in politics disagree so deeply about things they are really a supporter of the thing they are pretending to disagree with. Nixon was really good at this technique. He will go down in history as the most democratic Republican in US history. Jill is probably very happy Trump won. You just can't trust these people.

 

Do overs only apply to young childrens games.

 

sad thing for republicans not to want to verify the results are valid

every election should be verified to be accurate.... I do not dispute the results in this one, but I do think all results should be verified and reviewed

anyone found to have voted twice should be charged with a felony and never allowed to vote again

...

 

BS, no election should be challenged or 'verified' unless there is evidence that there was indeed fraud, period. We cannot play this anti-democratic game of challenging results every time we don't like them, this is 3rd world country stuff.

Is there any evidence other than sore loser liberals and there conspiracy theories? NO THERE ISN'T... SO NO RECOUNT OR VERIFICATION NEEDED HERE.

 

Right before the election, the left was questioning if Trump supporters would accept the election results without a revolt........Just look at them now.

 

They're the left-wing version of birthers, and they're a blood-seeking mob out behaving as such.

 

Stein is up to 5 million and now says she need seven.

You can feel the Clinton dynasty behind this concerted effort to steal the election. Money talks and one wonders what is going on behind the scenes. Like the primary showed where the superdelegates were bought off one wonders.

 

Because Nixon is our best moral barometer on how best to proceed in times of democratic quandary.

 

Nixon was a profane yet good man that stood up for his people when they were under attack and step down for the presidency instead of putting the country through an impeachment process. That something you've ever find a Democrat doing.

 

Its not the impeachment that made him step down, it was the lack of votes in the Senate to survive it, that made him step down. Nixon was a lot of things but this former Senator could count votes, and he knew who to call, when he was in doubt.

 

Proves my point. He stepped down instead of putting the country through an impeachment process.

 

she has 7mm now, o wonder who is funding this so fast... what a pathetic thing we are watching here. Clinton and her dirty tricks, using Stein to challenge election results so no-one attacks Hillary for being a hypocrite. I was wondering why Stein had any interest in this and i'm now thinking there is some collusion here...