The Right had the wrong slogan the whole time

I don't type words on here to win a popularity contest if that answers your question. I come here to tell the truth and deny others the freedom to hijack that truth. If the tone doesn't set well with them, no one is twisting their fingers to respond.

Surely you are capable of comprehension? Misrepresented the facts? How? The article is stating 67% of the entire coral reef. Where in that article did I misrepresent?

Really? I never heard her say global warming was a hoax. Did you?

When the shoe fits you'll just have to stay tired of that same old shoe. You folks earned your reputation.

Do you think I spent my time creating this thread just so I could trick others into believing otherwise? Lol! I don't have time or am interested in such stupid nonsense. Does that answer your question?

You are incapable of serious debate. Have a nice day.

 

Same goes for you. You are incapable of serious debate because you constantly contradict your own case and you aren't making any sense. "Humans may have made this cycle hotter than usual, but this is nothing new". That doesn't make sense. "New" as opposed to what?

 

Recent review? You can hardly get more recent than my November 29th link. By the way, where is yours that says it is only 5%? Also, my article isn't talking about dying off. It's talking about already being dead. I will be waiting for your link that refutes mine.

 

What a silly ridiculous question. My thread says nothing about neither one saving the barrier reef. This thread is about attitude, caring, and education. Too bad we have a president elect who hasn't a clue about any of those three.

 

We'll, we can certainly cancel you out with having nothing relevant to say. Everyone from the Right is displaying the same pattern with this debate. They literally have nothing to contribute as far as a counter argument.

 

On the contrary.
Trump won because the Democrats ran Hillary Clinton.
You have no one to blame but them.

 

Sure, I'll let you get back to reporting the daily temperature and pretending like it's relevant.

I wonder where those vikings were getting alllllll that carbon to make it so hot back then?

 

I'm sorry. What's the problem?


https://www.coralcoe.org.au/media-releases/life-and-death-after-great-barrier-reef-bleaching

 

So you can't? So all that huffing and puffing, but you can't define what the difference would be for the gbr if Hillary was involved

 

My thread is not about that, and you can only set the ground work for that conversation with your own thread. So boss, do yourself a favor and stop hijacking mine with off topic nonsense.

 

This is the problem; . But looking to the future, mass coral bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef will likely be an annual phenomenon within a decade, Torda said.

If all the coral died on the reef, “it would be among the largest mass extinction events in history,” said Torda.

 

Or prove that the decline of the Great Barrier Reef is due to "global warming" and not some other phenomena. I hope the greatest hoax in human history will soon be relegated to the history books like Charles Ponzi and his scam. I am not hopeful, however. The motive of the hoaxers - to control our money and our lives - will not die and neither will the beliefs of those who believe in "climate change" like other religionists believe in Islam, Buddhism or Shinto.

 

I almost can't stand the non-stop whining from the left in this dull news period. I'm excited for January, then liberals can come up with even crazier stuff.

 

What? Lol

From YOUR OP

While the soon to be climate denier commander-in-chief is busy setting up all his business deals across the globe as a conflict of interest before taking office, he, they, us, may want to take a look at what has happened to the Great Barrier Reef off Australia's coast; http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/s...-off/94554934/

???? Lol Jesus..... all this freak out but you can't answer how it would be different if Hillary won...

 

You still don't get it do you? I don't blame Trump or Hillary for what is happening down in Australia. I blame Trump for dismissing it altogether with his denial, while Hillary acknowledges the problem.

 

There are so many things in that diatribe it's hard to know where to start.
I have a college degree so that means I can't be a Republican right? I am tired of you people trying to make it out that all Republicans are stupid. That is racist and wrong on every level.

How is that racist? Are you saying only white people get college degrees? Who is the racist here???

The junk science in that second paragraph is simply astounding considering you claim to be a college educated person. Are you an alum of Liberty University ot Trump College....

 

Hillary wouldn't have saved (*)(*)(*)(*), the point is you have ONE candidate who said during the campaign that climate change is a chinese hoax and would rip up the fig leaf called the Paris Agreement on day one. And he's delivered so far in moving in that direction by hiring an anti-EPA lobbyist to...run the EPA. Whereas Clinton would've been no change AT WORST. The point is that moving backwards IS WORSE than standing still..


And just because HIllary would not be as bad as Trump does not automagically convert someone to 'supporting hillary' or '(*)(*)(*)(*)ting on trump' It's a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing fact these things I pointed out. They just ARE.

 

Moving backwards means torpedoing the globalist agenda and the insane western obsession with CO2. Good move Trump.

 

I made it clear. Earth is going through a natural warming period. We may have made this warming period hotter but in the end we will have a cooling period. It's all a natural process. It's not that hard to understand but nice try.

 

I did not know all Republicans were white but nice try. I was merely pointing out this guy acts like all Republicans are stupid. If you want to jump on his band wagon and attack anybody you disagree with go ahead. I don't really care.

My science is junk yet 30,000 scientists disagree with you. I made my point.

 

Clearly the human race first industrialized over 500,000,000 years ago, given it is proven fact that the climate can never change except by human industrialization and it known the climate has radically changed over the earth's history. Given that it is proven fact by scientists proving only humans cause change to the climate and sea levels and therefore humans have existed for at least half a billion years, they should be confident humans will survive again. And since other forms of life evolved to higher forms over this half a billion years they should see this as a good thing.

However, in my opinion their view that only humans affect climate change and sea level means they are liars, hired whores or idiots.

 

The climate change issue was for 3 reasons:
1. Money for government.
2. Power for government.
3. To divert all attention from serious environmental issues that actually could be addressed, but do not offer the advantages of #1 and #2, but instead would cost government money.

Of course the climate is changing and the sea level is going to rise. Humans may be a factor in this, but short of mass genocide of humans there is no real solution that would make a dent in climate change.

It also is notable that no government or hired scientific scientists to push government agendss actually explore or propose anything to address the issue. For example, rather than plans to starve and freeze humans, why is there no serious efforts to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere? The co2 can then be used for commercial purposes - ironically to extract oil and gas as an example - thus making it a matter of recycling between gather and using oil and gas - that produces co2 - which is removed from the atmosphere - to repeat using it to produce more oil and gas.

But there is no profit for government in this and it requires government action - rather than the government requiring us to sacrifice the quality of our lives to enhance their power and profits.

 

I wouldn't say everyone lost. There are over a thousand workers in Indiana who won the other day and that's a win win for tens of thousands in Indiana.

Who lost ? The foreign oligarchies, globalization, the corrupt Democrat National Committee, the Clinton crime syndicate and the Obama legacy are some of the losers.

Hasbro you makes Play Dough was a big winner.

 

Hilary Clinton had her solution to global warming - nuclear winter from her nuclear war.

 

Ah, but where government fails, private enterprise picks up the slack:

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/...-suck-carbon-from-the-air-make-stuff-from-it/

See, nothing to worry about. The carbon can be removed from the air, while making a valuable product. Now we just have to keep government from doing something stupid(like taxing carbon) in the meantime. The alarmists just need to (*)(*)(*)(*) off; we got this.