Japan not taking in refugees; says it must look after its citizens first

Waste your WiFi bandwidth on this. Send these homosexual rednecks to this forum.

I treat them the same way as I treat you.

 

YES! With electrified fences. I like to call it Australia's Concentration Camp for refugees.

 

Japan has not put itself on the UN list of the only 27 countries that take "refugees". That is their right. Each country decides whether they will accept refugees or not. Canada, USA, France, Germany, Australia and other countries have accepted refugees and now are paying the price with many good peaceful people mass murdered. Brexit, Trump, Hanson in Australia are a sign that a new world order is about to begin? God help us all, if u believe in a god that is?

 

Camp Rah-foo-gee

 

And a solution to the problem of a peaceful, prosperous, and cohesive society.

 

I bet if Japan had a border with Mexico they'd already have their wall built and cameras pointing everywhere. Those guys are pretty smart about security.

 

I plan on joining them for this phase.
Had Britain voted to remain in the EU, I had planned on joining them about now.
A nice place to grow old Japan. Space is a premium, but it's cheaper than in the UK. Double population density or no.

No dual nationality though. I'd be transferring my flag.

 

Because you have Liberals who are clueless about common sense.

 

Japan also has whaling. Its not known for being a particularly liberal society. Permissive about sex, though...

 

Funny, I don't see any lefties in America or abroad crying and pouting over it. I guess it's only a big deal when Trump does it. I bet it feels good to haunt so many people 24 hours a day.

 

Perhaps the Japanese have seen the chaos the 'refugees' have cause in Europe and don't want it happening in their cities, oh wait, too late
http://www.tokyoreporter.com/2016/02/22/tokyo-cops-arrest-turkish-asylum-seekers-in-gang-rape-of-woman/

 

Those refugees aren't fleeing our tanks and our bombs and our bombs and our guns... They're fleeing terrorists, who are blending in with the refugees to get to America. Hence our America first attitude. And if Hollywood is so concerned about it, they need to put their money together to build a mini city in California for the refugees and let them all go there, and STAY there until they go back home. They've got the money to do it if they really care. Problem solved.

 

Listen at you... Go find an inhabitable planet, LOL! That's not happening until we build a space craft capable of travelling light speed. The USA has 335,000,000 people, that's already too much. Here's a list of places that aren't densely populated and have more than enough room to take on every refugee in the world.

Much of Antarctica
Antipodes Islands
Ashmore and Cartier Islands
Much of Australia
Bajo Nuevo Bank
Baker Island
Ball's Pyramid
Balleny Islands
Much of interior Nunavut
Big Major Cay
Bouvet Island
Caroline Island
Clipperton Island
Devon Island
Elephant Island
Elobey Chico
Ernst Thälmann Island
Much of inland Greenland
Gough Island
Hans Island
Harmil
Hashima Island
Hatutu
Heard Island and McDonald Islands
Much of Iceland, especially its highlands
The upper alpine zone and nival zone of the Himalaya (and most other high mountains).
Howland Island
Ilha da Queimada Grande
Jaco Island
Jarvis Island
Jong Batu
Kahoolawe Island
Kerguelen Islands
Kingman Reef
Mborokua
Minquiers and Ecréhous
Melville Island
Monomoy Island
Prince Edward Islands
Navassa Island
Nomans Land
Much of Northern British Columbia
Much of Northern Ontario
Paracel Islands
Palmyra Atoll
Redonda
Round Island
South Orkney Islands
Spratly Islands
Stirling Island
Much of Northern Siberia
Siwalik (outermost Himalayan foothills) and surrounding alluvial skirt Bhabar in India, Pakistan, Nepal and Bhutan.
St Kilda
Tetepare Island
Tibet's upper alpine zone and nival zone.
Tinakula
Tritonia
Tumucumaque National Park in northwest Brazil

 

Are you serious defining Antartica, Nunavut, and inner Greenland as inhabitable?

You realize half those islands you listed have zero access to fresh water, right?

 

Surprisingly, the ones who pushed really hard to "diversify" white majority countries are starting to work their magic on Japan.

http://www.politicalforum.com/political-opinions-beliefs/479992-jews-use-holocaust-teach-japan-about-dangers-nationalism.html

I predicted a long time ago that once the US becomes an extension of the Hispanic 3rd world, homogenous East Asian countries will likely take over as world leaders, at which point, they will be the threat to a certain group who shall remain nameless. They must be doing the groundwork now, a good 50-100 years in advance. A very smart, calculating group.

 

True as far as it goes but why should "non-homogenous" countries have to foster the expense and dislocation of bringing in refugees who are unlikely to assimilate into a mixed society. See Arrest leads to renewed criticism of refugee policy. This is a snippet from the article:

Most of the refugees are not direct bombing victims. The country is in a civil war. It is not our job to take in members of competing warring factions who are tearing their own country apart. If it is truly the responsibility of the "world" to take care of the stranger and the refugee, it should not be limited to countries that are suckers. What should be happening is that these people should be taken care of in their own lands.

 

Of course, the Japanese people (yes, this really is the will of the people) are doing the right thing by not transforming their country into a dumpster for third world immigrants.

Thank you for linking to my thread Jews use the holocaust to teach Japan about "the dangers of nationalism", Brewskier. I appreciate it.

 

And a nearby planet does? We have a better chance surviving in Antarctica than (*)(*)(*)(*)ing Mars. You know that right? Just about any place on Earth is a safer bet than any planet we know of. We have to hit a couple of other solar systems to have a shot and we aren't even close to getting out of ours. The space talk is literally insane
without breaking physics so we can survive the trip. We'll all be downloaded onto hard drives before a live human can report back that they found another earth...if it's possible to ever report back. If our planet goes and we never know if anyone that left survived, it doesn't even matter. Like a tree falling in the woods that no one sees.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Send them to Saudi Arabia. The country is rich and has plenty of room. Problem solved. Oh wait....

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/sep/15/saudi-arabia-has-100000-air-conditioned-tents-sitt/

 

The West is the only part of the world that sees a need to bail others out. That cuts both ways. In the East very few care about social justice even in their own countries. So they certainly don't care about the rest of the "world." You'll see them shaking a tin cup when they have a self-made disaster. But not helping others. So the West is more admirable on internal social justice. But as for trying to fix the world the West can't carry 2 billion citizens of failed states in Asia and Africa. And even more if you include borderline failures in South and Central America and of course Russia and China.

 

All non-white countries get a pass. Only evil white male non-liberal Americans are bad even though they have exported their technological and medical advances around the world to benefit everyone on the planet.

 

As well as show up at every disaster.

 

Apparently some countries don't believe in self-immolation for the sake of their leaders' appearing warm and fuzzy.

 

The middle east Is why the middle east has issues and refugees. We are obligated to secure our citizens and that might mean confronting threats on someone else's soil.

Our government is obligated to its citizens only...

 

Lololol... yep, population density, that's the ticket.