Are you falling for that "fake news" as well? You realize fake news has been around from the beginning right. All this is.....is a tactic on getting people to agree, we need to infringe on freedom of speech, and only get news from the government or their "fake news". It's called freedom of speech. If someone is putting out fake news, their reputation will end them. If the majority end up believing them, well that's no different than living on a ball. And do you realize taking a ride to space requires you to strap yourself to a bomb, I mean you fully realize that right?
Wrong. Even if your idiotic claim that the sun is much smaller and cooler were true it STILL would be visible world wide if the earth were flat. There is no way to reconcile this fact and it proves you wrong. Even if a flash light fails to illuminate a person hundreds make of yards away the source of the light is still visible to that person No sir you have been ruined and crushed and humiliated by easy to see facts and you know you are outright lying when you deny them.
jrr777's posts in this thread is further evidence that he is easily persuaded to believe in all sorts of nonsense, that he cannot distinguish between reality and his own fantasies and that he will say and pretend just about anything to feed his confirmation and expectation biases.
What is the size/shape/map of the FE? How high is the Sun? I'm familiar with FE nonsense, there's no consensus answer to these questions. What are YOUR,answers 777?
Don't feed the person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people or making them laugh hyterically. My bad, I did.
Yup. It's a bomb. So what? So is driving a fuel truck. If he is that convinced the world is flat, worth the risk to confirm. At least then nobody will think he's out to lunch.
With a telescope you can clearly make out its features. It's definitely manmade and definitely not a UAV. - - - Updated - - - Because you would claim that because the pictures are on a computer that they are computer generated images.
I've been looking over the FE debunking videos I've made, the one that strikes most directly at the issue of flatness is the height of the Sun. Minneapolis is at 45° latitude, and 3096 miles from the equator. That put the Sun 3k miles high, if the Earth was flat. New Orleans is at 29°58' latitude and 2,060 mi from the equator, putting the Sun 3,572 mi high if the Earth was flat. Alajuela, Costa Rica is at 10°01' lattitude and 693 mi from the equator, putting the Sun 3,923 mi high if the Earth was flat. There's no consistency. The video shows the results of disregarding the published distances from the equator, and calculating Sun height by triangulation from cities a known distance apart. The results were abysmal. If the Earth was flat, calculating the height of the Sun would be child's play. There'd be no question as to it's height, of the shape of planet Earth. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRijpTNX3h3-Tbie5Vcnzxg?feature=hovercard
Are you saying that the sun cannot move up and down in elevation, but only east to west, and perfectly level no vertical movement whatsoever?
I'm not saying that at all. The observer (all observers, everywhere) sees the Sun move 15° in the sky each hour. An armillary sundial (such as I have) confirms this. Either the Sun rotates around the Earth or Earth spins on its axis, both contradict FE. Foucault's pendulum shows it's the Earth that rotates. The point of my video is that the height of the Sun cannot be calculated assuming the Earth is flat, the results are inconsistent and contradictory.
So serious question. Do you actually believe this or do you just get some kind of... amusement... from posting things like this? Like, what is in it for you to make these threads? What do you get out of it?
That's consistent with the FE crowd, from what I've seen. They like to say "Follow the facts where they lead", until the facts start to falsify their narrative - lol
Genesis 1:5(*) And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. I find it interesting that the word night has this definition: From the same as H3883; properly a twist (away of the light), that is, night; figuratively adversity: - ([mid-]) night (season). Clearly showing the earth "twists" or "rotates" away from the light. That is, the hebrew word for night appears to discuss the twisting motion of the earth from the light.
Another "flat earth" thread from jr777. So are you going to address these proofs that the earth is a spinning sphere (without relying on photographs) this time? Or are you going to continue ignoring them like you have the last few "flat earth" threads you've started? o That the earth is a spinning sphere is proved because tall buildings slowly sink under the horizon instead of fade away in the distance as you travel away from them on a body of water. o That the earth is a spinning sphere is proved because the horizon is curved when you look out the window of an airplane at altitude. o That the earth is a spinning sphere is proved because there no edge to the Earth where we observe longer hours of sunlight which would be the case if it were flat. o That the earth is a spinning sphere is proved because if you fly the same direction around the earth you end up where you start. o That the earth is a spinning sphere is proved because Polaris not move in the sky, which it would do if all the heavens revolved around the Earth. o That the earth is a spinning sphere is proved because Cassiopeia and the Big Dipper revolve around Polaris and not the Earth, which would not happen if all the heavens revolve around Earth. o That the earth is a spinning sphere is proved because without exception stars near the Equator make large arcs around the sky while those closer to the poles make small arcs around the pole. o That the earth is a spinning sphere is proved because the position of Polaris in the sky varies with latitude. o That the earth is a spinning sphere is proved because one cannot see Polaris from the Southern Hemisphere. o That the earth is a spinning sphere is proved because you cannot see the Southern Cross in the northern latitudes. o That the earth is a spinning sphere is proved because there sunlight on only half of the Earth at one time. o That the earth is a spinning sphere is proved because longitude changes more rapidly for equivalent miles traveled the closer to a pole you are. o That the earth is a spinning sphere is proved because it is irrational (not to mention loony) to assume thousands of scientists, astronauts, pilots, and travelers over decades and centuries have engaged in a massive conspiracy falsifying evidence to try to make a supposed false claim the earth is round.
One cannot answer a matter lest they first hear it. I have heard the argument and evidence from both sides, you have not. Your questions have all been answered through flat earthers who have the time to do so. Maybe, if you truly want to know your questions and how the flat earth works with them, maybe just maybe, you should look into it. Or continue your copy and paste.
You are lying. There is no evidence from the flat earthers only endless argument based on falsehoods. The evidence crushes you and you know it and has been in your face many times and you simply willfully ignore it
You're the one making the argument. Perhaps you can point me to where these proofs have been addressed and disproven. I've never seen them answered, and you've certainly never been able to address them. Let's just start with one. The fact that the Earth is a sphere is proved because the position of Polaris in the sky varies with latitude and disappears in the Southern Hemisphere. That would not happen on a disk, but only on sphere. Where is that disproven?
WOW!! You have got to be kidding me! You really have done zero research on the matter. You right now, are allegedly spinning at 1,040 mph, while traveling around the sun at 67,000 mph, while orbiting the milky-way at 490,000 mph, and the milky-way flying through space at over 1,000,000 mph, and yet we see the same stars in their same positions. Now I believe I know how your going to answer that, but before you do, seriously think about it......try to picture it. Maybe this will help, because this is what you think you are doing right now. Even though they made a very poor attempt, what is missing from this image/video? While your watching it, scale yourself down to size as if your standing on it, and just observe and think. http://search.myway.com/search/vide...r=sbt&trs=wtt&pToken=CAoQAA&ots=1487199761399 Might I add, that every experiment ever done as to proof of the motion of earth has failed. And please don't bring up Foucault's Pendulum, which proves nothing. It is easily debunked.
