Repealing age limits for sexual relationships.

Here we are. If it's really nothing else. And pregnancy risk and STDs are the only problem, then what is the chance to get HIV or become pregnant from homosexual oral sex with use of condom?

 

Do you literally not know the difference?

Sex

1. : either of the two major forms of individuals that occur in many species and that are distinguished respectively as female or male especially on the basis of their reproductive organs and structures
   
   
2. 2 : the sum of the structural, functional, and behavioral characteristics of organisms that are involved in reproduction marked by the union of gametes and that distinguish males and females
   
   
3. 3a : sexually motivated phenomena or behaviorb : sexual intercourse
   
   
4. 4 : genitalia
   https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sex

Hug

1. 1 : to press tightly especially in the arms
   
   
2. 2a : congratulateb : to hold fast : cherish hugged his miseries like a sulky child — John Buchan
   
   
3. 3 : to stay close to the road hugs the river
   
   
   https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hug

 

You're tralling or what? I asked what is the difference in this context? Why child can be able to give consent on hugging, but cannot be able to give consent on sex? What's the difference?

 

A child cannot give consent to anything, a hug, a kiss or anything else.

 

Yes he can.

 

No, only the parents can give consent to anything, but even if the parents give consent the state can intervene if it considers that the parents have been wrong in giving that consent. Ultimately only the state gives consent for anything done to a child, from what it wears, to who it sees, everything. A child cannot give consent to anything.

 

For anything done to anyone. Using this logic you can claim no one can give consent, not even adults, only state.

 

No there is an age of consent at which you gain some autonomy from the state regarding things you can give consent to. It varies between different countries what that age is and what the autonomy is. But again, children below the age of consent cannot give consent to anything, full stop.

 

They can, they just not allowed, that is why we have to change laws.

 

No they cannot, please tell me what a child can give consent to, anything?

 

I'm going to report this guy's posts to someone. I don't know who I would report them to, but this is NOT cool at all.

 

Say YES to chemical castration (or even real castration for all I care).

http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/05/health/chemical-castration-science/index.html

In South Korea, the abduction and rape of a 7-year-old girl last week outraged the public and prompted President Lee Myung-Bak to consider various measures including chemical castration to combat child sex crimes, according to local media.

Chemical castration involves administering medication -- via injection or tablets -- to take away sexual interest and make it impossible for a person to perform sexual acts. The effects are reversible, after the person stops taking the drug.

Lee said this week that all detering measures - including chemical castration - should be considered, according to the Korea Times.
After high-profile child rape cases, politicians worldwide tend to pledge a crackdown and harsher punishments for sex offenders, involving chemical castration, said Don Grubin, professor of forensic psychiatry at Newcastle University.

"In a way, I liken it to cutting the hand off the thief," he said. "It's very symbolic."

The use of chemical castration, while effective, remains controversial. While sex offenders may not be the most sympathetic group, critics say forced chemical castration violates human rights.

The process of chemical castration has been used in various forms, either forcibly as a sentence or as a way for offenders to reduce their jail time in several countries including Argentina, Australia, Estonia, Israel, Moldova, New Zealand, Poland and Russia.

At least nine U.S. states, including California, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Louisiana, Montana, Oregon, Texas and Wisconsin have versions of chemical castration in their laws. It's unclear how frequently chemical castration is used in the United States.

Earlier this year, Moldova legalized the practice for those convicted for child sex crimes.

 

Sex and hug for example.

 

May be I need to report you too?

 

No children cannot give legal consent to either, I am not interested in morals or how you "feel", that is just your wish list and justification for what you wish to do. The only argument that matters is the legal one, now either address it or be quiet.

 

Morals define laws.

 

Certainly, in the case of legalising homosexuality it was a law based on morals. However the age of consent is not based on morals but as I have shown over and over again on legal consent. A child cannot give legal consent to anything, legal consent is based on mental capacity, not morals. This is why the decision on homosexuality will not effect the age of consent.

 

You are the one talking about assaulting children. Sick ****.

 

These are all simple concepts which anyone with a functioning brain should be able to easily understand and should not have to be repeatedly explained. This guy is just trying to justify his disgustingness. Hopefully he ends up in jail or dead.

 

I know, I know. It's a sickness. They can't help it. Blah, blah, blah. Sorry, but I feel NO pity for them. In fact, just the opposite. I despise and hate them and wish they didn't exist. They are a scourge. They are a big pus oozing pimple on the butt of society.

 

And that means he can't do anything, right?

 

Actually I never talked nothing like this, but heard it from you many times.

 

So, explain, what is the difference between sex and hug, why child can consent on hug, but cannot consent on sex?

 

No that means he cannot give legal consent to anything.

 

A child cannot give legal consent to either, this has been explained to you over and over again, I have even shown you an example of this.