MOD WARNING<<<Dismantle multiculturalism?

Like who exactly?

 

You mean things that are prevalent in every culture and civilization since people could walk upright?

 

Just like what I replied to then. Point proven.

 

Dude (or dudet), Japan has 125 mln. people on half the territory of Texas - they are packed and have nowhere to expand.
Besides, Japan is expected to sink soon, so mother Nature has thought trough this population business in advance and doesn't send them many new souls. I believe this also answers the gentleman who complained about their suicide rate.
At least they can live their last days in peace, not bothered by bombs and islamic ghettos.

 

(laughing)

It's too late, we can't undo history. The Old World (mostly Europe) projected itself into Africa, the New World, the Pacific, the Middle East, Asia - in search of trade, goods, conquest, territory, souls. The mission now is to make a sustainable World - where everyone can have enough, if they're willing to work for it, & educate themselves, & work towards a better future.

 

????????????

 

Slavery, wars, lots and lots of wars.

 

The ONLY country on earth currently classified as sustainable is... wait for it, wait for it..... Cuba.

So you want to live in Sustainable World like Cuba does? How nice.
When will you and Barack Obama and climate change priests and Al Gore and Hollywood Glitterati move there?

 

Like the North Koreans - they're VERY homogeneous.
And the Aryan Nation project of the Nazis ... that was one grand, long lasting society ... for what, 10 whole years.

 

North Korea was never one of the strongest societies. No communist countries are.

I wonder how long it would have lasted if they weren't declared war on?

 

Yup, but their problem wasn't and isn't ethnic homogenity, but rather is it Socialism.

 

The german nation stands since 2000 years and it does so because its quite homogenious. Multiculturalism never works because it just creates paraleel societies. I have no non-german friends and almost zero contact with "minorities". Multiculturalism never works. It divides a nation and weakens it.

 

I wonder if frogs had wings would they bump their arses on the ground when they jumped?

You made a statement that homogeneous societies are the strongest.
I point out two very obvious examples that countered your assertion. End of story.

 

I said "the strongest societies were homogenous", not "homogeneous societies are the strongest". There is a difference, whether you are able to understand it or not is irrelevant.

 

But how can they possibly have problems if they're homogeneous? Isn't that the whole argument?

 

Its not relevant to debate this. The only fact that matters is to crush multiculturalism. To force all to completly assimilate into the nations culture or get the **** out.

I have zero tolerance for non german customs in Germany.

I´m proud that my homestate has only 1.4% non-Germans and from those only 0.4% are muslims. I´m proud that we have no mosque in our state. And i´m even more proud for the fact that the place where tehy planned attracts so massive demonstrations, that the construction could not be started.

Tolerance is the last virtue of a dieing man.

I tolerate evrything when i´m outside my country. But i tolerate nothing in my own.

 

Rome was one of the strongest empires in history - yet it comprised hundreds of different cultures.

The US has never been homogeneous, it's always been a collective of various religious sects and Spanish, French, English sub-cultures. African workers in the East. Asian laborers in the West. Spanish culture was and still is a predominant culture of California and the SouthWest.

Only those with rose colored glasses see great societies as having any single component.

 

Rome comprised one culture which did not tolearte any other. When Rome started to make evryone a romen citizen, it started to collapse.

 

Awww. Isn't that sweet of you.
How could Germany have possibly lost two wars against the mongrels of other non-German states with such a strong society as you portray?

 

And apparently not the fact that it was spreading too widely but too thinly or being invaded repeatedly or having an economic crisis.....

 

We killed 60 Million and lost because lack of Quantity.

But here comes the twist.

How could Germany rise from ruins into power after WWII?

Because it was homogenous. People stand for each other. Work for each other. Multicultural societies do not.

If your crap hole area would be put in ruins you would have violent gangs and sink into eternal anarchy.

This can be seen in New Orleans when that Hurrican did some damage. The entire city became a "Fallout" like scenario with mass rapesm downfall of order.

A multicultural society never has social security. It never can create greater stability or stand in hard times. It fragments as soon it encounters hardships.

So while in Germany the people build up the nation, you would be locked in your ruin, while Ongo Bongo rapes your wife and Miguel takes all valuables from your house.

 

No, it is not. I am not wasting my time with you because obviously you haven't read any of my posts.

Schüss.

 

How did Germany rise back to a successful society after WWII?

Because MY mongrel country gave your country billions of dollars to rebuild and kept thousands of OUR troops in your country to keep the Russians from turning it into a hole in the ground. Your country exists because my mongrel country let it exist after we whooped your ass.

 

So who classifies Cuba as sustainable? I thought they were very dependent upon tourism & (formerly) high prices for their sugar, rum, cigars; & lots of financial & technical support, POL imports @ low prices, from the late USSR & the Warsaw Pact countries. No, I think the future lies in the US & other actual republics - I don't see isolating myself in essentially a political dead-end like Cuba, no offense to the people there. They had their shot, & Fidel chose the Soviets & his moment in the sun. A steep price for the Cuban people, but here you have it.

 

Rome was homogenous until the end, when it surprisingly fell apart.

It's a Zionist lie that the Spanish, French, English, German, Scandinavians, Irish, etc were all different people with radically different cultures. The borders that separated them are a relatively modern creation. For most of Europe's history the various tribes that comprised the continent's population were nomadic in nature and moved around. They worshipped the same pagan Gods and took part in the same pagan culture. They had the same race, and shared the same ancestors. Having different languages does not detract from this. The Indo-European languages all have a lot in common with each other, some sharing many of the same words. So it's simply not true that things were "multicultural" just because different European peoples were all living here.

That doesn't sound like multiculturalism. The groups are separated.

That's not really "Spanish culture", that's Mexican/Latino culture. The culture in Spain is very different and much more European.

Good thing I never said it was based on any single component.