BREAKING: Car plows into dozens of protesters at far-right rally, extremely serious injuries

Source link?

Or just more bullshit?

Methinks it's the latter.

I gotta say, in terms of trolling, you're good. Like a BolognaSkin.

(not really)

 

There are photos of him attending the rally

https://mobile.twitter.com/LorenzoMeow/status/896561497110978561/photo/1

His mother also told the AP that he told her he was going to an alt right rally

https://www.google.com/amp/abcnews....t-knew-rallyi-thought-trump/story?id=49185691

 

The guy's bail should be about $25,000 for what he's charged with. A Virginia cop killed a guy and was charged with second degree murder and his bail was $25,000. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3433650/Virginia-officer-charged-murder-duty-shooting.html

Right now the guy is being held without bond, which is a violation of his State and Federal Constitutional rights.

And if he's convicted he will get about 5 years or so. The max is 40 but there's no way he will get that much time.

Based upon my observation from reading countless forums some people always whine that someone is trolling when the person makes any kind of comment they don't agree with. Grow up. This isn't pre-school for newborns.

 

He was no more antifa then you, but a dumbass?, without a doubt.

 

I use the term troll, to define the uselessness of your comment(s) as a general rule.

Been around countless forums as well buddy.

Gotta say, outside of being a bit off regarding bond & sentencing guidelines, for this/these type(s) of crime(s), nice post.

Tasty, like a BolognaSkin.

 

And what violent acts did the Bundy's commit? None. The only violence was committed by the federal cops when they stole and killed a herd of Bundy cattle.

Roof was a racist, he stated nothing about politics.

Whats interesting is the progs are so desperate to blame violence on conservatives that they make up "fake news".

 

I voted for Trump, I can't stand what the left wing media and Ovomit has done to this country. This guy should burn in hell. Don't care what he stood for.

 

OK liberals you have your poster boy no go ahead and commence associating every Trump voter and supporter to this vile white supremacist like we have all seen you chomp at the bit to do so
Go ahead and show how much of disgusting hypocrites you are how after the thousands of Muslim terrorist attacks we have had over the years how quickly and ruthlessly you will attack anyone that dared to associate those Muslim terrorist attack to any other Muslims
So just remember that when you start painting with your broad brush

 

I gotta ask... & I never ask about avatars, but is that David Duke's head on a Duke Cheer Leader's body?!

 

You do realize you are painting with several broad brushes in this post....

 

Here is an interesting video of the crash. It begins with several rabid counterprotesters following the lady around screaming at her. It would appear that they assumed she was alt right because... she is pretty? I dunno. But my experience was similar. A lot of people demanding others identify, and assaults happening if you identified wrong.



And this image really gives you an idea what the impact was like.



Thats a lot of shoes on the ground people got knocked out of.

 

The left has very few solutions and yes this will be more fuel for them. So what is the answer, we need to listen more to each other and I mean listen and understand each sides point of view. Stop with the name calling of each other and each sides leaders/beliefs. Also try to do what Jesus would do when addressing each other. You can say you disagree but first at least try to understand both sides.

 

It takes a broad brush to call out the vast majorities of liberals on this forum. do I need to bring up post after post done by liberals on this forum that had already painted Trump supporters as racist even before this tragedy? calling Trump a racist when they cant bring up one racist quote from him just using absurd circular logic to make their case. like Trump wont callout white supremacist by name there for he is one or sympathizes with them but will ignore the fact that Obama never called out Muslim terrorist by name
Now there are very few liberals that hasn't and I apologize to them but like I said those are very few in numbers
do I need to continue or do you get the message

 

how do you have a conversation with any one that will call you a racist, a homophobe, a transphobe, an Islamophobe, a sexist and every other phobe and ist in the book if you aren't in complete lock step agreement with them
and this isn't just from forum trolls we hear this from. this comes from their leadership. they don't want to have a conversation the just want to demonize

 

but they call Trump a racist a white supremacist for calling out the hate and bigotry from both sides as our liberal forum member ignore and make believe there is no violence, hate, or bigotry on their side

 

It's not relevant if a newcomer would "improve" the property - you're not stating why there's something wrong with the builder allowing others to take the property away as opposed to him passing it to his progeny.

Why is feeding low average IQ migrants more important than preserving the country's character?

There's a difference between being what you term "an equal citizen" with those there with you to giving the country away to a replacement population.You're trying to advocate that whites don't have a right to a homeland, anywhere.

No, as I said, it's just a matter of returning to immigration and citizenship laws from before the 1960s. That's all that's needed.

It's not "extreme" as I just quoted one of the American Founding Fathers. You're not advocating very well why white people don't have a right to a homeland where they can propagate their culture and pass their country to their offspring. White Americans are indeed a single group: Similar heritage, culture, and religion.

Demographics projections based on current migration rates say what? Are we entirely halting all immigration from this point on? If not, your above argument is complete crap. The nonsense here is that you cannot seem to understand that demographics projections in historically white countries with high immigration rates all point to whites being relegated to minority status in their own countries in coming decades, and you're not advocating why resisting that is wrong.

"LOL" isn't an argument, and accusing me of a negative emotion isn't an argument.

Are you reading what I'm writing before responding? This isn't even a response to my comment.

It's your animus that makes you think I was "targeting" people. I said nothing about black people in the least. Did I say black Americans were even a problem? Indeed, they were here from the start and I never said they should be removed or be mistreated. I was referring specifically to mass migration and the demographic and cultural changes that it brings. No more, no less. Try answering what I say rather than beat a straw man.

The predominant culture and values in the United States is directly reflective of those of its founding demographic. Again, if you disagree, visit the KSA.

That is not an argument as to why whites can't keep the country their ancestors founded in the image it was founded.

No, it's not sustainable. Migration levels are threatening to destroy the ethnic and cultural fabric of the country. As I've explained repeatedly, this isn't just a matter of "skin color," so again you're beating a straw man. You've yet to make a coherent argument as to why it's beneficial to flood the West with people from countries with violent cultures and low average IQs, let alone why the host country should be subject to demographic replacement.

Again, it's a simple matter of going back to immigration laws pre-1965. It's that simple.

Well of course. You feel threatened by the idea that the founding majority of the US has a right to keep the country's cultural and institutional character as their ancestors founded it. Why is that? Because the only countries that are advanced enough as to be desirable for residence happen to be white-founded, white-majority countries. Basically everywhere else on the planet is a **** hole.

Beating a straw man again doesn't prove your point. I never said "keep America all-white." I said control immigration and preserve the traditional national character of the country. The animus is yours which is why you keep beating straw men and putting words into my mouth.

Yet again, you're beating a straw man. I've never advocated this weird system you invented. I said to simply return to pre-65 immigration laws. That's all that's needed to preserve America's social fabric and cultural character.

My sole "justification" as you call it is to preserve the heritage of this country and its people. No more, no less. We are not obligated to hand over the country our people built to a bunch of low average IQ border hoppers who can't manage a livable country back home.

You didn't answer my point.

Because the large majority of them are. Nearly all of these people come from low average IQ third world hell holes where they were incapable of making a decent home for themselves.

I'm saying they have the right to base their entry laws on their interests, as we do. Do you feel they're obligated to turn their countries over to new arrival demographics or do they have a right to keep the character their ancestors founded it on which serves their interests? Or is that something you only condemn white folks for?

You completely missed my point, again.

Again, you're back to your basic argument that white people who refuse to give their countries away are "bigot" and "Nazi" by default.

That's not a response. You asked where I got it from, I told you where it comes from. As a former radical leftist myself, I'm all too familiar with it. Sadly, you internalize things on face value without deeper reflection which is why you keep making cutting, dismissive remarks like this when I explain where this ideology arises.

Why would I internalize bad straw man arguments and labels?

You're not paying attention. I was referring to the philosophical radical New Leftist/neo-Marxist propaganda about whites that's circulating. It comes from one source and has one goal.

No it means I'm clearly older and more knowledgeable on the subject than you are as I was a radical leftist for a number of years before I realized what was going on and I'm sharing the information I acquired about the left. I was referring to the tactics of the radical left to propagandize especially young white people into hating their heritage so as to help to destroy the country and eventually Western Civilization. You don't seem to be comprehending half of what I'm saying.

No, a lot of it comes from Derrick Bell who applied Critical Theory to race. Alex Jones didn't come up with it and invoking his name isn't a rebuttal.

Nothing I'm advocating is extreme. Extreme would be calling for genocide of non-whites. I'm talking about border control. Period.

 

Whoever did this, I'm really disappointed he didn't hit David Duke.

 

Right, which is an incoherent argument. They demand he take the side of a bunch of Marxists so as to "prove" he's not a Nazi. That's the level of journalism in the new zeitgeist.

 

Amusing you think anyone would feel "threatened" about some angry leftist on the internet making endless references to Trump and dildos.

I'd say you're under the age of 23.

 

people

I knowvtgat

Not our fault that you apparently are not astute enough to see through the birtherism crapbthatvyour Dildo Don was spouting. SAD,!

 

I have not seen any leftist do that. Identify him and proove that your mythical poster is a leftustand I will set him right.

 

Let me clarify: What exactly of what they as a group were doing was "white supremacist" and what qualifies as "white supremacist" to you?

 

I'd say you have it reversed: The left are continuously racist against white people but redefine the term according to the neo-Marxist revisionist version so as to exempt themselves from the definition of the term as provided in the dictionary of the English language.

 

So according to this poor rationale, Trump likewise didn't condemn the Communists there specifically by name, therefore Trump is a Communist.

 

It does ooze hate at anything white, white male, conservative, Christian, patriotic, or Western.