Who on the left or Anti Trumpets here will denounce Antifa or all violence?

ah, so some are just trying to downplay the white nationalists by mentioning this group, but have no examples from this event that compare.. look squirrel

 

I'm sorry you refuse to understand the antifa group used violence to attempt to suppress free speech - but there's noting I can do about it.

 

See Berkely. Clear bright shining example, (of many) where antifa suppresses free speech..... Through violence.

 

Jesus, it's not ****ing rocket science.

Antifa uses violence to stifle free speech.

Is that only wrong, when someone dies?

I missed that clause in the First amendment.

 

Apparently, liberals believe using violence to suppress free speech is OK when they disagree with the message contained in same.

 

I'm still looking for the "unless you really really don't like the speech" clause.

 

What's next, razing Richmond, the Confederate capitol to the ground? Oh wait they can't do that, too many Democrat voters there.

 

Pretty sure someone will be back with the claim that the 1st amendment doesn't cover hate speech.

 

Already know man.

I get tripped up by that from time to time too.



But unless those words fall under assault, not gonna fly.

 

ok, provide a example, we have provided an example of the white nationalist terrorists act, can you please post a terrorist act from the "other" side

 

I did already.

Berkely.

 

You haven't seen the video of the antifa terrorists fighting with the demonstrators? Its all over the news.
Why do you believe using violence to suppress free speech is OK?

 

Because Antifa silly!

 

I am still looking for the people can't disagree with your speech clause the right keeps saying is denying their free speech

does the right understand what free speech is? doesn't sound like it...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/31/palin-criticism-threatens_n_139729.html

"Palin told WMAL-AM that her criticism of Obama's associations, like those with 1960s radical Bill Ayers and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, should not be considered negative attacks. Rather, for reporters or columnists to suggest that it is going negative may constitute an attack that threatens a candidate's free speech rights under the Constitution, Palin said."

 

Disagreeing is one thing.

Using violence to suppress? Quite another.

I'm a Centrist BTW, thanks.

And Palin's one step removed from retard

 

Of course it's OK if they get beat up for expressing their opinions -- they're FASCISTS!

 

Now you get it!

 

and your example of that happening? we saw the white nationalists doing it this weekend, how about the other side?

 

People can't choose their neighbors. They can choose to move if they don't like new neighbors, but they don't have the right to stop people they don't like from moving in next door.

 

Posted one several times replying

Can you not ****ing read?

Berkeley

 

The nationalists demonstrated peacefully until the antifa showed up and attempted to suppress the right to free speech with violence.

 

I don't support that group and have already said that and have already said so, if they did that it is wrong, but it in no way justifies the terrorist acts this weekend and should not be equated to that

 

did you see their video's, hardly peaceful and hear the interviews of them after, wow

these local folks protested these white nationalist coming into town armed to the teeth spreading hate

http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/12/us/white-nationalists-tiki-torch-march-trnd/index.html

watch the video

https://www.instagram.com/p/BXrTc8dlWgY/

chanting "Jews will not replace us. Death to Antifa. White lives matter. "

what a peaceful group.... not

and yes, if you look up my posts, I say the same things about groups like the NBP in the past, bad is bad, regardless of group

 

My bad.

Apparently I can't ****ing read well today.

This weekend is immaterial.

I've already stood against the fun from both sides.

 

And so, you agree with Trump, who, like you, blamed both sides for the violence.