Roy Moore: Gloria Allred’s Refusal to Release Yearbook Proves Allegations Are ‘Completely Untrue’

Ouch.

But the alt-right will ignore that and continue to support Moore. That's how sad this country has become. It's more important to lock up the gays than it is to actually elect a decent person to office.

 

Sure, because voters always elect who the media says to elect......hahahaha!

 

The two are not mutually exclusive; each may, and often does, contain elements of the other.

 

He'll sue right after he skates on his favorite frozen lake in Hades - count on it.

 

Yes, and to turn the yearbook over to ANYONE at this point would be insane.

The idea that this proper withholding signifies that Allred or the accusers aren't trustworthy is silly.

Also, there's a mountain of evidence against Moore already; focusing on the yearbook is like solely focusing on Franken's disgusting, harassing photo rather than his assault and other harassments.

It's distraction and deflection.

Moore, like Franken, needs to go.

 

Roy Moore has been outed as a scumbag pedophile. There are witnesses that are far more credible then this plebe scum.

**** OFF, MR. MOORE!

 

It would be insane to do so, and there's a mountain of evidence against Moore apart from this signature.

That mountain should be the focus rather than this molehill distraction.

 

Why would it be insane, there are valid questions about the it.

 

What's a "journalist" now a days? Its lost all meaning now. EVERYONE is a journalist if you can type news into your Twitter feed. Besides, former journalists lying for political gain is pathetic enough. Enter the NYT. Lie on the front page then retract on page 8 a few days later. What's the harm, right? Journalism DIED in 08.

 

Those "valid" questions are largely a fabrication from Moore designed to try and convince his supporters that they have a reason to ignore the testimony of seven women.

As to why it would be insane to turn over the yearbook, see the following:

Consider the tactical side of Gloria Allred, what is to be gained by turning over the yearbook? Even if every aspect of the yearbook gets authenticated, what happens? Does Roy Moore admit that he sexually assaulted her? Of course not. Does his supporters admit that the yearbook was not altered? Probably not. Proving the validity of the yearbook only confirms that Roy Moore knew her at the time and was willing to sign a message that could be innocuous

 

See prior responses.

 

^ Thread win.

 

Nonsense

There is NO evidence against moore except the yearbook

But if its fake as it now appears to be it would help moore and hurt Allred and her client if it were examined by forgery experts

 

If your gonna lie about an accusation you do it with words alone and not creating fake pieces of tangible verifiable evidence.

 

So you say, but you are 100% wrong. The valid questions, if true, completely destroy the allegations.

 

Yes, the fake yearbook was a big mistake by Allred

 

There's massive evidence, and the ludicrous argument Moore is making about the yearbook is deflection from his guilt.

If he were innocent, he would sue the pants off these women and gain access to the yearbook that way.

But he won't sue because he's a slimy, lying, desperate predator playing for time.

Don't be pulled into his lies, Mac.

 

Then Moore has nothing to fear from a Congressional investigation.

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...-hand-over-yearbook-evidence-because-its-fake
Moore's comments come after Allred offered to hand over the yearbook from one of Moore's accusers to a congressional committee if the panel agreed to hold hearings on the allegations.

 

And you showed how lacking that claim to higher authority was in the Trayon Martin shooting. You made the similar claim we all didnt know what we were talking about and that Zimmerman had committed a stalking and an assault under Florida law, that we the uneducated in the law simply were not capable of reading statutes and properly interpeting them but YOU being so trained would explain them to us.

Still waiting...

 

It'll be a looooong wait since Zimmerman didn't commit either crime. He was the one assaulted and the one who rightfully defended himself.

 

Well how conviently self-serving of her since the goal of the accusations is to ensure he does not get to the Congress in the first place when such an ethics investigation would then be called. It needs to be examined NOW and by independent forensic examiners. I would like to see the accusor put under oath and crossed but don't see how that is going to happen her attorney is mot filing any charges.

 

And did you support Clinton?

 

Does he have to actually be in Congress for a congressional investigation to take place? No, he does not.

 

There are only hearsay assertions

But only one piece of real evidence that allred the lawyer refuses to release

A law suit would force release of the yearbook but not soon enough to help roy moore in the election

This is clearly a liberal Big Lie

 

Well yeah else what is the grounds for a congressional investigation. It would be before the ethics committee which investigates members of congress not private citizens. Congress is not a court.