I'm no liberal, but I am FOR open borders and I advocate your position every day. State and local governments that bring in undocumented foreigners should get NO tax dollars that could be spent for those people's upkeep. Employers could hire whomever they want, but we could also offer substantial tax incentives to employers to hire an all American workforce, take Americans off welfare, unemployment, and disability. So, the employer could hire cheap foreign labor and pay high taxes OR hire Americans and get lower taxes. No border needed. As for the people on the right: The obsession you have with forced citizenship only means that the next generation will become a minority and this entire debate will have been for NOTHING.
They was fine once big time for hiring an after hours clean up firm that was full of illegal workers.
You do know that illegals are far less likely to be violence criminals then citizens? So demonize any group is possible but not all that helpful or meaningful.
And still the right wing build the walls types shop at Walmart, expecting the government to save them from themselves.
As I said in a previous post, SO WHAT? The fact still remains the same, they are here illegally, which is a crime onto itself.
Not all right wing people look to the government to save them. Here is a special little bit of information for you: It is because of the “Most Favored Nation” status that was bestowed upon China, during the Clinton Reign, which is one of the reasons why Wal*Mart is so successful. Both sides are to blame for the economic strife that is America in 2018 and before this year.
Something interesting I just found out: I had always assumed that after the Civil War when slavery was ended the cost of cotton must have gone up. But apparently that was not the case. price of cotton before the start of the Civil War in 1860 was 10 cents a pound. http://mshistorynow.mdah.state.ms.us/articles/291/cotton-and-the-civil-war price of cotton in 1876 was 9.7 cents per pound. http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=33770 It appears the burden of not having slaves must have probably fell entirely on the producers then, and not the consumer.
