Teens roam streets with rifles as crime swamps Sweden

Lets consider the fear and misery that Swedish people are living in right now thanks to their governments decision to inundate their country with savages.

Lets also keep in mind the fact that the Democrats are marching us towards the same fate here in the US.

 

I feel for Sweden. But lets not pretend America is as easy a target. A few 'gun-free' urban centers aside, thugs know they can't rampage in America. Not and survive the experience, anyway.

 

Its all about territory.

To expand you need numbers.

Democrats want to provide the numbers.

We surely can fight back but we shouldn't have to.

The Democrats shouldn't be creating the conditions for a fight in the first place.

Plus I would argue that there are places in America where gangs can and do rampage freely.

One needs only to think back a few years to the BLM riots or to look at the vast ghettos of certain large cities.

 

Inundate? Roughly 5% of Sweden's population is Muslim...and you call that inundate?

For goodness sakes...learn what words mean before you type them and you won't make such ignorant posts.


As for your xenophobic-sounding post? I doubt anyone with an IQ over 100 whom is mentally balanced takes your dribble seriously.
Which is why your kind are restricted to posting your nonsense anonymously in chat forums like these. If you did it in the real world among sane, intelligent people....they would roll their eyes at your blather.


Have a nice day.

 

Blah, blah, blah.


BTW, I am against allowing refugees into America (refugees camps - paid for, run and protected by the West...including America - near or in their home countries is the solution, IMO).
But I am TOTALLY for legal immigration from ALL countries and from all religions...even 'Shithole' countries.
There are wonderful people all over the world.

But the kind of xenophobic talk as above is just nonsensical and ignorant drivel that solves nothing except to satiate the anger of the uneducated and/or the uninformed.

 

Let us not forget it was the USA that created the refugee crisis by its actions in Iraq, Libya, Yemen, and Syria.

Cities and towns were bombed into rubble. The rubble was then bombed into dust.

Europe is the unfortunate victim of USA's military actions.

 

The Syrian problem is not completely of America's doing. No one put a gun to the heads of those who started the Civil War there.
But America is largely to blame for the general mess that is much of the Middle East right now...yes.

 

Obama's actions*

And given how happy these cucked nations were to INUNDATE their lands with these savages you have to wonder if it wasn't planned from the start.

The libs in those nations wanted their very own special interest minority block that they could control just like the Democrats here have.

And look, they got one.

 

I doubt anyone would welcome radicalized criminal savages into their own neighborhoods despite having the, what was it, 900 average IQ score that comes with a major in afrohispaislamotrans interpretive culture dance studies?

How many MS-13 members do you invite to stay in your spare bedroom?

I can't remember, was ...none?

It was none right?

 

Ya, the urban centers, often 'gun free' zones where criminals are given the upper hand.

 

Gun free signs are like a beacon that says "commit crime here".

Sweden made their entire country into one of those and then imported the criminals.

One wants to sit back, laugh, and say "reap what you sow muthafukas".

But then one remembers that, just as it is here, there are good people that don't choose what government does to them.

Hopefully their Army will take care of the problem.

 

It serves the Swedish people right and I have no sympathy for them. Fools get what fools deserve.

Yes, don't let your guard down for a minute, and put your trust in The Donald.

 

LMAO...What an ignorant load of twaddle.
You people embarrass yourselves every time you open your mouths.

 

Blimey, talk about 'pots calling kettles black'.

 

How many MS-13 members do you want living in your neighborhood?

Awww, none right?

 

Reap --> sow was my first reaction as well.

But it sucks because I know there are good people there who adamantly objected to what their cuck government was doing.

Sucks even more because they cant arm up.

 

Maybe just as well they can't, or there will be civil war on top of everything else? The country is finished and it will never be 'Sweden' ever again. Despite what I said, I'm sorry for the 'refuseniks' who didn't want mass immigration in the first place; but then stupid people always get their way by making the most noise? It's what stupid people do!

 

I could not agree more.

 

A poster made the argument that Muslims are only 5% of Sweden's population.

This is a racist argument.

The implication is that if they were, say, 55%, that would be something to worry about.

 

Wow...what a completely ridiculous thing to say.

What I said was the following:

'Inundate? Roughly 5% of Sweden's population is Muslim...and you call that inundate?'

My point - which should be staggeringly obvious - was that 5% does not constitute 'inundate'. That was the beginning and the end of the point of that sentence.

The implication was that the poster whom I was quoting has NO IDEA what 'inundate' actually means. It had NOTHING to do with race whatsoever.



Also...religion is not a race. Muslim's are not a race...they are of a religion...DUH. It s not racist to talk about religion...even in a negative way.

Jeez...do ANY of you Trumpbots know what ANY words of significance mean?

 

No the poster made the point (correctly) that 5% is hardly "inundated" try actually reading the post!

 

Thank you.

 

I don't think the poster was quibbling about vocabulary -- what exact percentage crosses the boundary into 'inundation'. They were saying, hey, it's nothing to worry about, they're only 5%. Which implies if they weren't only 5%, there would be something to worry about.

Think about it this way: if Sweden got a large influx of Norwegians, 5%, even 55%, they might grumble a bit (even though they used to be under one government), but you wouldn't have all the uproar you have now. It's because that 5% are Muslims that there is a thread here.

I want to help good anti-racists avoid becoming racists by accident. So I'm pointing out that the "there aren't that many of them" argument is implicitly a racist one.

 

LOL.

I think 'the poster' (me) knows what he was 'quibbling' about a hell of a lot better then you do.

Besides...the sentence in question only referred to the word inundate...it mentioned - and inferred - NOTHING about race.

'inundate

[in-uh n-deyt, -uhn-, in-uhn-deyt
See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
verb (used with object), inundated,inundating.
1.
to flood; cover or overspread with water; deluge.
2.
to overwhelm:
inundated with letters of protest.'

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/inundate

As noted in example 2; how the heck does 5% constitute 'overwhelm'? It doesn't. My point was valid...whether you like it or not.

And again...being a Muslim is NOT a race....DUH.

Why are you having such an incredibly hard time realizing this obvious fact?


And I would appreciate it if you stop telling me what I mean when I type something...especially when I say I do not mean your interpretation.
Or do you normally go around telling people what they mean when they say something?

Whatever...you are a waste of my time and we are done here...for now.

Good day.

 

My money's on Doug.