Space is not expanding!

I feel like Faraday....

 

I challenge anybody to challenge this definition:

Time is an arbitrary quantifiable measurement indirectly proportional to ageing.

I challenge anybody to challenge this statement:

There is no space/distance/length between now time and your next now time.

p.s now immediately follows now, you can try for yourselves counting time.
Count slow or fast, does your counting alter time any? of course not and neither does counting the caesium frequency fast or slow


End of story period, there is no time dilation there is timing offset.

 

Ah...so not actual "Visual" as much as those pesky voices you hear speaking in picture books. Best to ignore them when talking to people.

 

not baiting, just showing your ideas are nonsense.

 

yes, but it's completely meaningless to say you can't see the object in 3d any longer.

 

To show my ideas nonsense you would have to actually discuss the idea you know!

 

I'll just tackle one of these, as it shows the rest of your tripe is moronic.

now.......................................................................................now.

Now that your theory is debunked, perhaps you should actually take a basic physics, algebra, geometry, trigonometry and calculus class. Then you can avoid posting silly things.

 

Then you are not considering the extent of the meaning, what happens when all the bodies in expansion become visually 0 dimension?

 

I did. I also showed it to be nonsense, as have about 4 other people so far.

 

nothing. They are still 3d.

 

You seem to have missed out all the now's between your now and your imaginary length.

 

nope. I just showed the length between 2 nows. It is a measureable distance.

So, now that your theory is debunked, perhaps you should actually take a basic physics, algebra, geometry, trigonometry and calculus class. Then you can avoid posting silly things.

 

How big will the visual universe be when they are in the non-observable space?

 

distance? what distance?

 

It is very very important

 

yyyyyyyyuuuuuuuuuuuuugggggggggggeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!

 

between the now........................................................now.

That distance.

 

you can say that again,

 

nownownownownow

no distance

 

An observable Universal expansion can only lead to an observable Universe contraction......

 

Just showed you there is distance.

 

No you have just considered time as discrete packets instead of a continuous flow where the next moment of now immediately follows now.

 

No, I just showed you there is distance.

 

No , you just put a distance in that does not exist in reality.

 

You are trying to say that things which are adjoined have a length between them which is logically stupid.