Keep global warming under 1.5C or 'quarter of planet could become arid'

Ah. so by 'get out of the way' yall really mean 'participate, but shut up.'

I figured as much.

I do not consent.

 

Venus is a classic example climate scientists evoke to prove that CO2 causes a planet warming and it is a classic proof that climate scientists are charlatans and scumbags whether they argue for or against GW.

The assumption that all planets started at equal mass, equal composition, equal mode of motion and at equal time is absolutely bogus like each and every statement made by NASA, NOAA, NAS and IPCC.

Venus has not been warming.

Understand?

There is a huge difference between the state of being hot and the state of being warming.

Understand?

The climate scientists, NASA, NOAA, NAS and IPCC count that these simple facts can never be understood by minds brainwashed and indoctrinated in schools and colleges.

Venus is another proof of the simple truth that if you change all Earth atmosphere to 100% CO2 the mean of temperatures of weather stations will remain the same, the Earth will remain as hot as it was, it will not be warming,

because,

CO2 or aerosols are not sources of heat, not heat sinks, they are not producing/consuming mechanical work and there is no way to heat or cool anything without at least one of these 3 things.

This is the law of nature, science, the 1st beginning of thermodynamics, dQ=dU+dW, sanity.

The climate scientists, NASA, NOAA, NAS and IPCC count that the underlined sentence can never be understood less accepted by minds brainwashed and indoctrinated in schools and colleges.

Everything about GW is an absolute insanity.

But you are as brainwashed as others, you have no clue what I am talking about, and you will not believe me, but you will believe that there is some rational in at least something climate scientists, NASA, NOAA, NAS and IPCC say to you everywhere you go, everywhere you look, won’t you?

 

How long did it take a monkey to evolve into a human while all their family and friends watched them slowly turn into a human generation to generation while the other monkeys somehow missed the cut and remained monkeys? What do you think we'll evolve into?

If anyone is descended from a monkey, it's because a human from thousands of years ago got lonely and donked a monkey and since we have relative DNA, a monkey/child was mixed up and born. But that's not overcomplicated, overstudied, and complacently dreamed up so it's not good enough. Too simple.

 

Did I really need to specify industrial carbon dioxide?

 

Venus is closer to the sun, after its oceans burned off it reached a tipping point

 

Your consent is not required. If you want to use power generated by an electric company, you will pay the appropriate price.

 

Venus is further from the sun than Mercury and yet it is hotter than Mercury because Venus is an example of a climate controlled by a runaway greenhouse gas.

 

No, it is used by climate scientists to help illustrate that heat is trapped by greenhouse gas. Venus is further from the Sun than Mercury and yet it is hotter specifically because of the greenhouse gas, CO2.

 

Venus is a classic example climate scientists evoke to prove that CO2 causes a planet warming and it is a classic proof that climate scientists are charlatans and scumbags whether they argue for or against GW.

The assumption that all planets started at equal mass, equal composition, equal mode of motion and at equal time is absolutely bogus like each and every statement made by NASA, NOAA, NAS and IPCC.

Venus has not been warming.

Understand?

There is a huge difference between the state of being hot and the state of being warming.

Understand?

The climate scientists, NASA, NOAA, NAS and IPCC count that these simple facts can never be understood by minds brainwashed and indoctrinated in schools and colleges.

Venus is another proof of the simple truth that if you change all Earth atmosphere to 100% CO2 the mean of temperatures of weather stations will remain the same, the Earth will remain as hot as it was, it will not be warming,

because,

CO2 or aerosols are not sources of heat, not heat sinks, they are not producing/consuming mechanical work and there is no way to heat or cool anything without at least one of these 3 things.

This is the law of nature, science, the 1st beginning of thermodynamics, dQ=dU+dW, sanity.

The climate scientists, NASA, NOAA, NAS and IPCC count that the underlined sentence can never be understood less accepted by minds brainwashed and indoctrinated in schools and colleges.

Everything about GW is an absolute insanity.

But you are as brainwashed as others, you have no clue what I am talking about, and you will not believe me, but you will believe that there is some rational in at least something climate scientists, NASA, NOAA, NAS and IPCC say to you everywhere you go, everywhere you look, won’t you?

Understand?

 

Venus is a classic example climate scientists evoke to prove that CO2 causes a planet warming and it is a classic proof that climate scientists are charlatans and scumbags whether they argue for or against GW.

The assumption that all planets started at equal mass, equal composition, equal mode of motion and at equal time is absolutely bogus like each and every statement made by NASA, NOAA, NAS and IPCC.

Venus has not been warming.

Understand?

There is a huge difference between the state of being hot and the state of being warming.

Understand?

The climate scientists, NASA, NOAA, NAS and IPCC count that these simple facts can never be understood by minds brainwashed and indoctrinated in schools and colleges.

Venus is another proof of the simple truth that if you change all Earth atmosphere to 100% CO2 the mean of temperatures of weather stations will remain the same, the Earth will remain as hot as it was, it will not be warming,

because,

CO2 or aerosols are not sources of heat, not heat sinks, they are not producing/consuming mechanical work and there is no way to heat or cool anything without at least one of these 3 things.

This is the law of nature, science, the 1st beginning of thermodynamics, dQ=dU+dW, sanity.

The climate scientists, NASA, NOAA, NAS and IPCC count that the underlined sentence can never be understood less accepted by minds brainwashed and indoctrinated in schools and colleges.

Everything about GW is an absolute insanity.

 

Yes. Because unless you do, you never accept your own contribution to the serious problem you're hyperventilating about and spewing your own excess into the atmosphere the rest of us have to live with....

 

Agreed. This is why I have been arguing that you cannot take a Venus for example and compare it to Earth and say see? The planets are not the same, or even close.

Yes, I do.

Agreed again.

Actually I do understand and agree with/believe a lot of what you stated there.

 

Every post you disagree with is a troll post to you, dude. Not many people agree with you, get over it. Half of your posts throughout threads is "troll post dismissed." At least I don't have to worry about you responding anymore while you piss and moan.

ETA: Troll post dismissed

 

Pretty dishonest to compare Venus with 96.5% of it's atmosphere being CO2 with Earth which is what, .038%?

The only commonality they share is being planets and round...

 

No scientist assumes any of that. This is why you have no clue what your talking about. Show me where you read every planet was assumed to have the exact same composition. Are you talking about the big bang? What are you even talking about...

 

lol. careful, you're totalitarianism is showing.

 

Pay the appropriate price for industrial carbon dioxide emissions.

 

I'm OK with that level of "totalitarianism."

 

Do you truly reject the notion that Carbon Dioxide is a greenhouse gas? Or that greenhouse gases trap heat?

 

It's not about directly comparing venus to earth does everything have to be explained in crayon?

 

Not at all, is that what you gathered by 96.5% being some reliable comparison to .038%?

Sure it's a greenhouse gas, so is Methane...so is Water Vapor.

 

Another poster claimed we had great experience with Planetary Climate studies, and said we have 3 to compare for scientific control purposes.

One was Venus, one was Mars and one was Earth.


Sorry, that's like comparing a Baseball, a Grapefruit and a Rock. Sure they're all round, but outside of that.....

 

That's the entirety of the point of referencing Venus. Carbon Dioxide is a greenhouse gas and it traps heat.

Coincidentally, increasing carbon dioxide on Earth will also increase the amount of water vapor and the amount of methane in the atmosphere.

 

GW hoax is nothing but an attempt to install a totalitarian regime.

 

And you don't see any dishonesty in presenting what is almost an entire ball of C02 as some valid comparison to Earth's climate?