F.B.I. Raids Office of Trump’s Longtime Lawyer Michael Cohen

More on Fetus aka baby
https://english.stackexchange.com/q...rd-baby-to-mean-fetus-or-any-synonym-of-fetus

3 Answers
activeoldestvotes
Fetus was used to refer to a newborn child also in Latin:

• In Latin, fetus sometimes was transferred figuratively to the newborn creature itself, or used in a sense of "offspring, brood" (as in Horace's "Germania quos horrida parturit Fetus").

The Pregnancy Terms Glossary of Medical Terminology defines:

Fetus as:

• Medical term for the baby before it is born, ie when still in the uterus.

the AHD and the Collins Dictionary give one definition of baby as:

• An unborn child; a fetus.

Ngram show usage of the expression baby fetus from the 60's.

shareimprove this answer
edited Dec 12 '15 at 8:11


answered Dec 12 '15 at 7:43
user66974

 

I have a PM box which shows you to lie.

I will ask a mod to view it and prove you are lying. I would produce the contents of your numerous threats in the past, but many boards do not allow a member to post PM's rec'd.

I can do so (not in this thread, as we are off topic) if it is allowed. I have PROOF. Stop lying.

And you seem utterly unable to understand the difference to someone remarking about YOUR WORDS -- YOUR POSTS --
(especially after you broadbrush and defame an entire profession and huge swaths of an entire gender) and a personal ad hom/

Learn the difference.

 

You are now harassing me. I will not do this publicly.

 

Robert...you get personal and then defensive all the friggin time.

You need to knock it off.

 

Don't post the PMs. He is trying to get you to do something that will get you in trouble with the mods

 

Notice when you rock the boat, things get far worse. As to your claim I get personal, perhaps once in a blue moon.

 

He lied so it is up to him to submit his proof. It does not exist.

 

Looks like that ploy didn't work.

Better luck next time

 

You were saying that’s what men do in bars....locker room talk.. I have to assume that these men are like trump who was in his sixties. I don’t know any man in his 60s who goes to a bar and brags about grabbing *******, cheating on his wife, and being a voyeur in teen locker rooms. But after all, it’s just boy talk....at 60!
No , women don’t go to bars and brag about grabbing dicks and creepy things like being a voyeur. Please don’t make the ridiculous comparison to women going to male strip clubs for laughs. I don’t consider men who go to strip clubs and stuff money into G strings as usual activities.
I think you are really a sad character that you have to make up excuses for despicable behavior...like he was drunk etc. so sad.
I care very much about his behavior and demeaning women..,obviously you don’t..and you say you have daughters? If one of your daughters or granddaughters came home and said some man grabbed them inappropriately or some man came into our locker and watched us undress....what excuses would you make for the man? , I care about sexual harassment very much and obviously you don’t...”it’s just a guy thing” By the way I can care about his sexual misconduct and his deficit creating, his tax cuts for the rich, his destroying our Image in the world and his putin worship. You see, some of us can multitask.
What makes obama a narcissist? Obviously you have no idea what that word means. Have you ever seen Obama talk like that video I just showed you? I wonder if you even looked at it because psychiatrists use that to show narcissism. His belief that he is the savior is a personality defect.
By the way, I don’t believe for a minute that you were ever a Democrat

 

You do realize your videos are from right wing extremists....the description could be for any person in power,

 

This is insanity.....Yeah Trump has done all to keep his mouth shut because he doesn’t want his behavior known....Yep it’s all the women’s fault. They should just be quiet because after all they are the ones hurting his wife and son. You should be ashamed of yourself

 

If they find a crooked business person and want to investigate and prosecute, more power to them. In this case, however, it is not WHAT is being done, it is HOW it is being done. The "how" is very bad indeed.

 

No. I don't remember even one against Obama.
Obviously Hillary was scared of one, that's why she pulled out the hammers and acid. But it never happened, did it?

 

Why?

 

Isn't that a PF Rule violation?

 

Does not matter to the first two as to the third the OP is about Trump's lawyer and fixer Cohen,who has two admitted clients and Hannity who denies he's the third.

 

Emails showed Hillary rigged the DNC primary for one thing. "Crooked Hillary".

 

Tell me when Trump is charged with blackmail, until then it's just more TDS on display.

 

In what way is it bad as the raid and paperwork needed to go by level after level of review of the JD and then sign off by a federal judge so what is very bad?

 

Judges don't just give law enforcement a search warrant. The evidence has to be there to give them one,which means it is justified.

 

Good to see "Progressives" are all about Campaign Finance Limits:

Bombshell: FEC Records Indicate Clinton Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million

 

Your beloved BLOTUS is 100% responsible for FAILING to appoint anyone to become FEC commissioners ergo this is HIS FAILURE and INCOMPETENCE that needs to be addressed first and foremost.

https://www.salon.com/2016/12/15/fe...donald-trumps-drain-the-swamp-effort_partner/

https://www.publicintegrity.org/201...ald-trump-let-federal-election-commission-rot

 

The Giant Orange Tornado For Good was POTUS during the 2016 election, Silly! the deeply corrupt America Hating Obama was.

FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million

The mainstream media took no notice of a federal court filing that exposes a $84 million money-laundering conspiracy Democrats executed during the 2016 presidential election.

The lawsuit filed last week in a DC district court, summarizes the DNC-Clinton conspiracy and provides detailed evidence from Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings confirming the complaint’s allegations that Democrats undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits.

From Bundling To Money Laundering

Dan Backer, a campaign-finance lawyer and attorney-of-record in the lawsuit, explained the underlying law in an article for Investor’s Business Daily: Under federal law, “an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state party committee, and (during the 2016 cycle) $33,400 to a national party’s main account. These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of those contribution limits—it’s legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit for any one recipient. And state parties can make unlimited transfer to their national party.”

This legal loophole allows “bundlers” to raise large sums of money from wealthy donors—more than $400,000 at a time—filtering the funds to the national committees. Democrats and Republicans alike exploit this tactic. But once the money reaches the national committees, other limits apply.

Suspecting the DNC had exceeded those limits, a client of Backer’s, the Committee to Defend the President, began reviewing FEC filings to determine whether there was excessive coordination between the DNC and Clinton. What Backer discovered, as he explained in an interview, was much worse. There was “extensive evidence in the Democrats’ own FEC reports, when coupled with their own public statements that demonstrated massive straw man contributions papered through the state parties, to the DNC, and then directly to Clinton’s campaign—in clear violation of federal campaign-finance law.”

 

NONE of the above REFUTES what I posted about your feckless BLOTUS!