DNC sues Russia, Trump campaign and WikiLeaks over alleged election interference

The complaint alleges criminal conduct on behalf of Manafort and Gates that took place before, during, and after Manafort's time with the Trump campaign.

But here is a link to the latest about the Trump DOJ confirmed investigation into suspected collusion between Manafort and Russia:
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/tr...ller-suspects-paul-manafort-russia-collusion/

 

So what you’re saying is just take the plaintiffs word.

No, they should not do that.

 

DNC on Verge of a Nervous Breakdown with Russia Lawsuit.

The DNC approaching a nervous breakdown. They're seeing things and are in panic mode.

And they should be. Their Russia collusion delusion is coming down all around them—it's amazing it lasted so long—with many of their stalwarts, from Andrew McCabe to a slew of high-ranking FBI and DOJ officials, and even, though less likely, some Obama insiders, fighting to stay of out the slammer.

Impeachment doesn't play well with the public and neither will sorehead lawsuits, especially when juxtaposed with the IG's facts.

Democratic strategist (apologize for that rancid term) Julius Epstein, looking justifiably anxious on Shannon Bream's show Friday night, tried to argue this was a great opportunity for the Democrats to expose folks like Manafort and Kushner through discovery.

Good luck with that. Discovery in this matter would be disastrous for the Democrat Party. Wait until their leaders have to go on the stand to explain why the FBI wasn't allowed to scrutinize the DNC servers that were supposedly invaded by the Russians. A raft of Democrat political factotums (Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, etc.) who made sweetheart deals and escaped true investigation by the FBI, perhaps even Hillary herself, will find themselves facing serious cross-examination for the first time. This civil trial would be curiously reminiscent of the OJ civil trial when the real truth came out. Wouldn't you love to hear Strzok and Page deposed? How about Susan Rice?

The Democrats are suing @WikiLeaks and @JulianAssange for revealing how the DNC rigged the Democratic primaries.

https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/dnc-verge-nervous-breakdown-russia-lawsuit/

 

Yes finally getting the DNC server and seeing other emails we may not have seen. Maybe explanations as to why they didn't have proper measures to protect their email accounts and why Podesta gave someone his password to get into the system. And then the emails between them and Fusion and Steele as they all tried to interfere in the election AND ACTUALLY DID SO using information from RUSSIA.

I can't wait for the judge to look at Perez and say"Mr. Perez why are you suing the Trump campaign for unsupported allegations of collusion to try and win the election when in fact you DID engage in collusion to try and win the election and did so with Russia through a foreign agent? It seems I should be awarding the Trump campaign damages caused by you".

 

WOW you know I hadn't thought about that. If they have immunity from prosecution then they cannot claim the 5th in the civil depositions that will SURELY take place.

Oh my this idiot Perez is showing exactly what an idiot he is along with his deputy chair Keith Ellison.

 

Not a righty. I voted for Ann Richards. Have been saying that for a long time. I have a very easily accessible post history on my thoughts of electing Trump. You should do your research before calling people things they aren’t. But why would you do that when you can act superior?

Nobody but crowdstrike had their hands on the server.

 

In two weeks I doubt we will anything further about this lawsuit.

 

Neither the FBI, CIA, DNI, nor the NSA are plaintiffs in this case.

 

What more needs to be said? If anything, it speaks volumes as to the Clinton machine and DNCs utter and complete hypocrisy.
Crybabies. Sore losers. Children. Guess they don't believe in the Democratic system do they? The DNC supports the will of the people when they believe it was a lock and they had a "LANDSLIDE". Funny how life works.

 

So I think I saw Hillary with an execution room in her mansion. She tortures people there. The help that cleans it told me about it. My sources won't reveal their names though. I think its about a 50/50 shot it might exist. Lets start an investigation and raid her home quickly before she can have it removed and cleansed. If she already got rid of it, any paperwork in the house needs to be taken and viewed since there could be evidence there. And she might have hid some evidence in her safety deposit boxes and bank records. We need to have full access to the those as well, because if there is proof of it, we need to see it and leak it to CNN. Why not? I think it could exist. If it doesn't I guess I was mistaken. No big deal if I'm wrong, right? I THOUGHT it exists. I really could have sworn...like a 50/50 chance I heard...or something....

DO people see how corrupt this is becoming?

 

You have a great understanding of how the current process works.

 

Not with that crappy and misleading example... you couldn't be further from what happened if you tried (and I assume you didnt)

 

I think Pred was writing a parody of the Mueller investigation.

 

Hehe. You would think that would have been obvious

 

Ooh...ooh.....Now do one with guilty pleas and indictments list for each respective investigation!

 

Except the plaintiffs will be using that info.

 

For that which people claim Hillary did: zero.

That for which people are claiming Trump and his team did(collusion with Russia for the election) : zero.

 

And? If the DNC is able to submit the testimony from the DNI, the CIA, and the FBI as their evidence, that does not mean that the defendants will be entitled to the DNC servers

 

Your analogy is absolute ****. But allow me to break it right from the beginning.

Tell us your actual name. The people making allegations against Trump and his associates are real people with reputations and civil/criminal liability on the line if they lie.

 

It is a crap analogy. See post #169 for just one reason.

 

Right, so they will just have to take their word for it....

That’s the third time you’ve basically used the they will have to take their word for it line of logic. They shouldn’t, because that’s not logical.

 

They are completely within their right to attack the reasoning and justification being offered by the DNI, CIA, etc. But that is not the same as saying that they get access to the DNC servers.

 

Why would they be resistant to anyone looking at said servers? Shows their hiding something to the layman.

 

It’s not just Hillary Clinton who can’t quit Russia. The whole Democratic Party keeps going back to 2016.

In a move that reeks of desperation, the DNC filed a civil suit Friday against President Trump’s campaign, Russia and WikiLeaks, alleging a vast (right-wing!) conspiracy to tip the election to Trump.

The suit’s flamboyant charges made headlines, but that only served to obscure the real meaning. Namely, that top Dems are giving up their fantasies that special counsel Robert Mueller will deliver them from political purgatory by getting the goods on Trump.

The trashy suit is their way of trying to keep impeachment and Russia, Russia, Russia alive for the midterms in case Mueller’s probe comes up empty.
Despite a large, secret budget and a squad of seasoned gunners, many of them Clinton supporters, Mueller hasn’t produced any evidence of a crime by the president.
https://nypost.com/2018/04/21/democrats-are-getting-desperate-as-mueller-stalls/

 

Yea...it's called confidential communications within a private organizations. No ****. The DNC has already had it's private communications blasted across the internet and dissected by numerous media organizations.

Do you think that the RNC should do the same?