DNC sues Russia, Trump campaign and WikiLeaks over alleged election interference

This argument is really, really ****ing terrible. If I can look through 20,000 of your personal emails, I can craft any narrative that an opposing or non-discerning population will accept as fact.

 

She did not commit election fraud though.

 

Yea is an interesting side battle.

I don't think the DNC realized how exposed they're going to be if they push this.

 

Yes , she did. She illegally defrauded Sanders, and presidential primary election ARE COVERED by Federal election laws.



https://elections.uslegal.com/violations-of-election-laws/

 

No, she did not. You would be arguing that Trump is passing on an opportunity to pursue felony election fraud charges against debbie. Are you?

 

I am saying that the DNC , with Clinton, conspired to defraud Sanders and his voters, as evidenced by their OWN EMAILS and TEXTS. The President has bigger fish to fry, and Rome wasn't built in a day.

As a democrat, YOU are who should be demanding the DNC and Hillary be held accountable.

 

Ok arm chair lawyer, save me your sanctimonious bullshit about how I should be the one pissed off and make the argument. Tell me - explicitly - how they defrauded Sanders and his voters.

 

Umm...I provided the Act of 1971, that clearly illustrates what I stated to be factual.

Your surrender on that FACT and resorting to personal attacks , duly noted, and enjoyed.

If you are not upset by the defrauding of Sanders...fine by me. Hillary didn't win anyway...and this lawsuit makes ALL THE EVIDENCE they have been hiding (that hasn't been destroyed) FAIR GAME to the entire GOP, Pres.Trump, and his people (incl. RUDY GUILLIANI ) ,WikiLeaks, etc. ad nauseum.

What a buncha TWITS the dnc has become....they have literally lit the oven, to cook their own goose...

 

Maybe. It could also prove Crowdstrike correct.

 

True, but the DNC could have proved that a long time ago. To make matters even more suspicious, Mueller and his team of insurance agents didn't prove that a long time ago, either.

 

Oh yes they will and the process has started.

Roger Stone To Use DNC Lawsuit Discovery To Probe Servers, Hacking Evidence

“The DNC lawsuit opens the door of discovery. My lawyers and I want to examine the DNC servers to settle this bogus claim of Russian hacking once and for all,” Stone declared.

A letter from Stone’s lawyers to the DNC said, “One purpose of this letter is to advise the DNC we intend to test the basic underlying claims that “Russians” hacked, stole, and disseminated DNC data, rather than the various other plausible scenarios, including internal theft.”
http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/23/roger-stone-dnc-lawsuit-discovery/

There are Democrats probably peeing in their pants after Perez pulled this little stunt. No one has "proven" it was even Russia and there are lots of claims otherwises. The defendants disproving the underlying claim, claiming it was by some other means, is WELL within discovery. You know more and more I doubt your user name with some of the stuff you post.

 

....you provided the act of 1971? Wtf. Citing to a statute, which I did not personally see, is not making an argument. You have to apply facts to the statute.

Make the argument.

 

Yea...roger stone and dailycaller...ill trust my own judgment above either of those asshats.

 

Try actually reading it, Alinsky.

I provided it; you have to actually read it. Main point=presidential primary elections are subject to FEDERAL ELECTION LAWS, and the one I cited pretty much covers the possibilities, including the fraud perpetrated by the dnc against Sanders and his voters.

If you aren't interested enough to avail yourself of the facts...that's fine with me....

 

Your judgement?? In what legal proceeding does "discovery " not go BOTH WAYS?

 

What a buncha TWITS the dnc has become....they have literally lit the oven, to cook their own goose.

 

Who committed election fraud? In order to prove their case they DNC will have to finally cough up their server in discovery. If they wiped it since the the alleged hacking they lost already.

 

Exactly. The PF "legal expert" fails to grasp that reality....+ the FISA apps...and everything else....

The dems have just done this:

 

This is going to be better then when Hillary lost her landslide. Much gloating indeed...

 

Oh yessss.....

 

You seem to criticize Pred for not using his/her real name. I don't know about MrTLegal but beyond that I know of nobody, for Trump or Trump haters, besides me that uses their real name on PF. Secondly the chances of anyone being guilty of libel or slander against Trump is virtually zero. I thought Pred's parody was right on target.

 

That is about as funny as saying that

 

That really the best legal defense you have to what I stated? Pitiful.

Again
No one has "proven" it was even Russia and there are lots of claims otherwises. The defendants disproving the underlying claim, claiming it was by some other means, is WELL within discovery. You know more and more I doubt your user name with some of the stuff you post.

 

So your argument is a statute...and that statute applies to the primaries? Woah.

Now, try to make an actual argument. What did the DNC do and how do their actions fit within the statutory language that you think is applicable?

 

And its going to cost the party a pretty penny too.

Just who is in charge over there?