The Pentagon on 9/11 - MODERATOR WARNING ISSUED

The topic of this thread is the Pentagon on 9/11. Can we please get back on topic. Thank you.

 

Citing one incident of the 9/11 attacks as only a microcosm is rather like KKK churchstate cops making a running joke out of semesterly thefts of textbooks while at college over 3 1/2 years right after the Fuhrer's Brainwashing Inquisition dictated no one steals & burns US Constitutions over the same 3 1/2 year period in the US, even if KKK churchstate cops did just that at a Navy hospital. Looks as if the not so master race master plan of 9/11 took on the Pentagon again.

 

To be more accurate this thread is about the controversy regarding the conflicting theories of planes vs other possible causes that destroyed part of the Pentagon on 9/11. I further narrowed it to those who do not believe the OCT. There are other threads that discuss many other 9/11 issues.

 

Immaculate conceptions of other possible causes is pseudo science of KKK churchstate cops after stealing & burning a US Constitution on a cross they stole from a navy hospital in August 1971 & the Federal Lynching state of hate drug traffickers still protecting & serving Arab terrorists in September 2001 attack on navy code Pentagon offices; where once is an accident, twice is a coincidence; but there are no coincidences other than Byrd's national religion accuracy of conflict destruction regarding any OCT. & counterpoint.

 

word salad ...

 

There's that master race "we'll learn Jew" tautology master plan forcing those to pay double or triple for copies of college textbooks per semester to get an edJEWcation from a national religion of Islam Christiananality pedophile mentalities who got their second coming thru 9/11 & it's subsequent patriot act propaganda lynching enforcement. It's almost like the Federal Lynching state of hate EMT berating that one cannot call 911 for the elderly throwing up; while noticing he was getting paid for not recognizing a mini-stroke symptom of the drooping corner of one side of the mouth & sending past due notices 6 months later......

 

http://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm
(excerpt)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION'

Topic dilution is not only effective in forum sliding it is also very useful in keeping the forum readers on unrelated and non-productive issues. This is a critical and useful technique to cause a 'RESOURCE BURN.' By implementing continual and non-related postings that distract and disrupt (trolling ) the forum readers they are more effectively stopped from anything of any real productivity. If the intensity of gradual dilution is intense enough, the readers will effectively stop researching and simply slip into a 'gossip mode.' In this state they can be more easily misdirected away from facts towards uninformed conjecture and opinion. The less informed they are the more effective and easy it becomes to control the entire group in the direction that you would desire the group to go in. It must be stressed that a proper assessment of the psychological capabilities and levels of education is first determined of the group to determine at what level to 'drive in the wedge.' By being too far off topic too quickly it may trigger censorship by a forum moderator.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.tomatobubble.com/id196.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/weapon...ory-disinformation-agents-and-the-cia/5524552
http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com.es/2012/03/radical-rethinking-of-conspiracy.html

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/08/31/are-you-a-mind-controlled-cia-stooge-paul-craig-roberts/
(excerpt)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you smirk when you hear someone question the official stories of Orlando, San Bernardino, Paris or Nice? Do you feel superior to 2,500 architects and engineers, to firefighters, commercial and military pilots, physicists and chemists, and former high government officials who have raised doubts about 9/11? If so, you reflect the profile of a mind-controlled CIA stooge.

The term “conspiracy theory” was invented and put into public discourse by the CIA in 1964 in order to discredit the many skeptics who challenged the Warren Commission’s conclusion that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by a lone gunman named Lee Harvey Oswald, who himself was assassinated while in police custody before he could be questioned. The CIA used its friends in the media to launch a campaign to make suspicion of the Warren Commission report a target of ridicule and hostility. This campaign was “one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”

 

Only at the nutjobs.

<smirk>

 

Do you feel superior than the other hundreds of thousands in these positions that don't believe in truther nonsense? ...

 

As if enduring sociopsychopathicological Nazi economics isn't enough Nazington, D.C. & it's supreme swastika up Uranus court needs a second coming crusade of cross conditioned way beyond therapy super ego star bellied sneeches in survival of the fittest fascists "man is God" propaganda nonsense concerning 9/11 & the Pentagon attacks.

 

21st century ChristHitlers having more intellectual dissonance than Nazis at the Nuremburg Trials after 9/11 must be a full time national religion tautology job ~smirk~

 

You can't make proof go away with snide remarks. Something without any substance said in an authoritative patronizing manner is still without any substance. All of your posts lack substance.

Start watching this video at the 1:55:25 time mark.

September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)


http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=9632&st=0******=0
h t t p : / / pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=9632&st=0 & s t a r t =0

National Security Alert - Sensitive Information
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=National+Security+Alert+-+Sensitive+Information
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/2170

http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/faq/can-north-side-plane-hit


April Gallup - Was there a bomb in the Pentagon?

(2:20 time mark)


http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson
(excerpt)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.
----------------------------------------------------------------


This explains the passengers' remains we are told were found at the Pentagon.

Painful Deceptions 911 Documentary by Eric Hufschmid Full Version

(43:45 time mark)


http://physics911.net/missingwings/


Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out!



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you pro-official version posters really believe what you're saying, you should check out this info.


Psychologists help 9 11 Truth Deniers


http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/821-why-do-good-people-become-silentor-worseabout-911-.html

https://www.globalresearch.ca/911-a...elieve-in-their-own-brand-of-miracles/5630813
(excerpt)
------------------------------------------
Interestingly, Griffin divides the world into three types of people:

• Those guided by evidence
• Those guided by their paradigms of how the world is thus if 9/11 being a false flag does not fit into their paradigms of how the world works they simply will not consider the evidence
• Those guided by wishful-and-fearful thinking thus if the idea of their own government perpetrating an horrific crime on their own people is too awful to bear they simply will not believe the evidence
  Shouldn’t self-styled skeptics, by definition, be of the first type? Apparently, not a one is. They seem to be all of the second type or possibly third.

 

just answer the question Scott ,,. quit hiding behind you tube videos made by children ...

 

That's a presumptuous question. You presume it's nonsense. Tell us what you think of what April Gallop says in the video I posted in post #588.

If someone takes the time to look at the crushing proof that the official story of what happened on 9/11 and still maintains that the official story is true, I'll feel that that person is in denial because he's experiencing cognitive dissonance. I'll feel a little sorry for that person.

 

Putting a round peg with apendages in a square hole where there was no hole in steel reinforced concrete seems more like the movie Hunt For Red October, but then again it did end up the Penobscot River in Maine......

 

Who are they? Experts who don't buy the OCT are almost all identifiable and they number well over 3,000. Those experts who "don't believe truther nonsense", please list 1,000 valid names (outside of any government affiliate), I won't even bother to ask for one hundred thousand, never mind "hundreds of thousands". Do you feel superior making **** up in defense of the OCT?

 

why do you employ confirmation bias when believing witnesses? ... what about all the witnesses at the Pentagon that saw a large aircraft with many of them seeing the distinct markings of an AA plane? ... I have asked you this many times ... please answer ...

I have been to enough engineering conferences over the past 16 years to get a good gauge of at least the engineering community ... 9/11 is still a popular subject at Happy Hour ... but there's always that one guy ...

1000 names? ... is there supposed to be a list of professionals that don't believe in truther nonsense? ... c'mon Bob, you're just being silly now ...

 

Translation, not one single valid name.

Translation, see above and shifting the BOP of a manufactured claim, as usual. And you want to talk about credibility?

Another problem with your claim. You never defined exactly what "truther nonsense" actually is in your mind. Is it that the truth is nonsense or that people who believe in truth are nonsensical?

 

I dealt with this issue in posts #7 and #10 on page #1.

 

A lot of viewers have watched this video.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-28#post-1068983836

You only hurt yourself in their eyes when you call those experts children.


You paid sophists will never concede defeat no matter how clear it is that you're wrong.

http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html
http://www.whale.to/b/sweeney.html
(excerpt)
----------------------------------------------------
6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of 'artificial' emotionalism and an unusually thick skin -- an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial. Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the 'image' and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It's just a job, and they often seem unable to 'act their role in character' as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later -- an emotional yo-yo. With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game -- where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up.
----------------------------------------------------

When you're checkmated on an issue (which constitutes losing), you go into a "Bury it" mode and try to reduce the number of viewers who see it and then you go on as if nothing had happened. I've seen that the best way to thwart that tactic is just to keep asking them to address the simplest most obvious proof so that they have to say some pretty lame things to maintain their positions. Then, their success rate goes down significantly (They can be quite successful at misleading viewers if they just talk to each other before a group of people who haven't seen the real proof and there's no one asking real questions.) If they're saying lame things, it doesn't matter how authoritative and patronizing their attitudes are as something silly said in an authoritative patronizing way is still silly.

Watch the video in which April Gallop speaks in post #588 and give us your analysis of it. All of the viewers are watching.

 

Could be a 'shine on' with those 1,000 points of light, but if Federal Lynching churchstate of hate KKK cops with their immaculate drug conceptions to protect & serve Arab terrorists that threatened POTUS & to nuke Temple Mount prior to 9/11 utilized that national religion baptizing thine eyes by urination the way Putin uses novichok, which was similar to the same trover & conversion education of thieving college textbooks by thieving US Constitution-old glory arsonists for Rehnquist's immaculate drug conception Reichquest against the Pentagon code & cypher offices; wouldn't put it by them to use a missile in conjunction with an airplane in deception as all those Islam-Muslims that got acknowledged to being as holy as Muhammad & those 40 virgins nirvana in suicide.

 

Observing man made artificial emotions evoked from a mass neuroses of fascism to elicit a mass psychosis of fascism certainly does their "man is God" super ego good beyond the pleasure principle......

 

What the No-Plane Theories Imply

1. That the 140-foot wide damage to the Pentagon, including a 96-foot-wide puncture, were somehow produced by a means other than a plane.
2. That fires smelling of burning jet fuel, were produced by some other means, or the photographs were faked.
3. That the aircraft debris, some clearly from an AA Boeing 757, was planted.
4. That the swath of downed lamp-poles matching a 757's wing span were sliced and knocked over by some other means.
5. That smashed objects in the paths of the engines were damaged by some other means.
6. That scores of eyewitness reports of a jetliner were faked, coerced, or coincidentally mistaken.
7. That the identification of Flight77's victims was fraudulent.
8. That Flight 77 and all on board were disposed of at some unknown location.

To believe that the Pentagon was not hit by Flight 77 requires accepting points 7 and 8.

To believe that the Pentagon was not hit by a jetliner requires accepting points 3 through 8.

To believe that no plane hit the Pentagon, one has to accept all 8 points.