No attack, no victims, no chem weapons: Douma witnesses speak at OPCW briefing at The Hague

Well, some may say that RT is not enough credible source. Just watch the video. What do you think about it?

 

I'm not buying it, probably offered a lot of money and added threats for good measure. A defeated people forced to deny their worst nightmare... very cruel... sick bastards

 

Nevertheless, they look very convincing. Do you really think that simple people, not actors can perform that well in front of a lot of people with cameras? I think this video just do not match your pattern.

 

come on girl how could you not trust a face smiling at yah like this

 

You should see me when my husband threatens to take the credit card away (just kidding)... yes I do, in their position which is clinging on to all they have left, their lives and one another, yes I do they will say whatever Russia and Assad tells them to.

 

Glad you enjoy my avatar! But you do not need to trust me. Just watch the video and think about what you saw.

 

liars usually smile... just like that deceitful emoji, not a big smile, a soft I'm sucking you in and lying through my teeth smile.... ^^^ like him

 

hey i got green eyes to

 

It does not matter if I am a liar or not. What matter is that this is a concrete proof that the chemical attack was staged. However you may go on posting funny pictures here instead of just addmitting the facts.

 

yeah i heard in on a radio show while driving the other day, it fits what i seen with the photos of the use of water bottles i seen drowning the poor kids

 

The performance by Russia at The Hague was staged, and shame on Russia for doing this

 

Ok, If you do not believe the 17 vitnesses then I give up.

 

can yah dig it

 

you mean the 17 hostages

 

It's been two weeks since the alleged chemical plants were bombed and we have yet to see even the slightest evidence that these buildings were manufacturing chemical weapons

See? I told ya it was all a FALSE FLAG.

Now watch as traitor trump and his puppets plant stories about imaginary Iranian nukes and other "threats" against the West.

 

Why? Because I posted here an uncomfortable video? Right?

 

Russian propaganda doesn't make me uncomfortable. It's generally amusing, in fact.

That's what I think about it.

 

Amusing? Right, I also found the video amusing! Especially after days of total lies on all MSM.

 

Western mainstream media has studiously avoided going to Douma to find out what is really going on, instead choosing to stick its fingers in its ears and blather la-la-la-la-la-la-la. It has also chosen to ignore the few Western journalists that have gone to Douma and filed reports, which say much of what these witnesses said at the Hague.

Opinions of trolls notwithstanding, this video, along with the reports of Fisk, Pearson et al is the closest thing we have to the truth of what went on in Douma.

 

What video?

 

OP

Oh dear, so what now for the three warmongers? Contrition? Yeah right! That supposed Douma scenario could have been anywhere, and would have taken about an hour to set up and get the VTR's rolling, but look at the trouble it caused; hopefully not too many were killed in the missile strikes by the three stooges who actually believed it all.

 

I thought the following article provided a decent round-up of the growing number of dissenting news stories about the alleged Douma gas attack.

For me, I'll go every time with Robert Fisk's report. He has it down as a case of smoke and dust inhalation following a bombing and the White Helmet's used that to stage a fake gas attack.

Imo, Fisk is one of the few class act journalists left, who doesn't automatically suck the teat of the government PR spin masters and spout their abominable propaganda. He is joined, I think, by Peter Hitchens, who likewise disbelieves the fairy tale told by the British and US financed White Helmets.

More significant in many ways are the number of British military officers who publicly dissent with the government line and hold the view that the White Helmets faked this story. These include Lord West, former chief of the Royal Navy, General Jonathan Shaw, former commander of British Forces in Iraq, and also Britain's former Ambassador to Syria, Peter Ford. These three, imo, have gone public in order to represent a significant number of serving British military officers who cannot openly speak but who consider the government's posture and decision to bomb Syria to be pure folly and of the order of the lies told by Tony Blair over the dodgy dossier for going to war with the US in Iraq in 2003.

https://steemit.com/news/@clarityof...syria-was-a-false-flag-conducted-by-the-white

 

Although I have posted the below article in another thread, I think it important enough to repost here too.

Elihah Magnier is a highly respected journalist. In this article he outlines that the original US, Uk and French plan was to strike Syria's military to cripple it and "to destroy it completely".

For that to happen they required a false flag operation as justification. The alleged Douma gas attack was just the ticket for that. In the UK we had the very, very curious Skripal Novichok affair which to my mind was also a preparatory psyop to prepare the British public for the planned strike on Syria (probably amongst other things such as deflecting attention away from the growing unpopularity of the May government).

I understand that the British information warfare unit, Brigade 77, was the responsible party for developing and spreading the alleged Douma gas attack.

https://ejmagnier.com/2018/04/17/th...orld-disaster-only-missed-at-the-last-minute/

 

I think all this business took us closer to WW3 than the Cuba missile crisis; Trump, May and Macron must be held to account for it all, because it reveals severe flaws of judgement in all of them. None of them should be allowed to hold high office.