Which is more accurate about President Obama?

Was President Obama:

1. The first BLACK president
2. The first interracial president

Which one is MORE accurate? If a person is 50/50 of two different races, is the person just of one race? Or both races. The MSM and Democratic Party insist one of the two races must be erased from the person's ancestry to fit their racist division model.

A million times it has been declared President Obama was the first BLACK president, and never the first interracial president, though he is as much white as black.

The Democratic Party began as the racist political party in Andrew Jackson, the Slave Nation party in the Confederacy, the Jim Crow and forced racial segregation party and to this day non-stop via racist hate mongering demands racial and ethnic disharmony and division.

President Obama as the first interracial president - elected by both blacks and whites - contradicts every claim the Democratic Party makes. Therefore, they MUST ONLY say he is black, not mixed race. But which is more accurate as the REAL truth?

 

The real truth? The real truth is that people who obsess over this quibble are kinda messed up in the head.

 

Obama is a crime boss in the Mulato Mafia.

Valerie Jarrett, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Kamala Harris are all Mulato Mafia wiseguys.

 

For what it's worth, Barack Obama was the first officially mixed-race president of the United States of America. Besides which, Bill Clinton was the first Black president . . . according to leftist history before they -- er -- white washed it to be currently Politically Correct.

 

The MSM obsessed over President Obama being the first black president, didn't it? I guess they are all "messed up in the head" and should be put off the air according to you.

 

They did for awhile, but then they let it go. You, on the other hand are still obsessing.

 

Obama was the first black President based on looks and the first bi-racial based on genetics. He looked very much black and acted very much white....there is your truth and reality.

 

There is a third option : Barack Obamah was a moron. Maybe we can stop judge people on their colour of skin and seek for virtue in the heart.

You says that because you're white and american. You don't know what is to be of mixed race, especially when one of your parent come from a country where there is a majority of [insert any colour of skin] and another country where there is a majority of [insert another colour of skin].
If your father is russian and your mother is senegalese, you will always be a black for russian and always a white for senegalese, and always a foreigner in both case. But often you will be pretty hot so it balance a little bit that "always foreigner" feeling.

 

I agree. People who twisted legitimate differences of opinion related to policies being pushed by Obama into evidence of racism against the Nations first Black President are most certainly messed up in the head.

 

I says that because it is accurate truth.

 

You obviously don't know what it is to be of mixed race, that's your truth of how a white see a mixed racial black man. That's extremly boring for a lot for mixed racial people to be considered always from the other race, when they're simply both. Obama is a politician, a politician is a whore, so Obama is a whore. Like all politician, he is a manipulative maniac, so yes, he found a way to instrumentalize his colour of skins. But for the biracial commoners (and not only white black biracial, white/asian, and even if I never met one there is too black/asian biracial).

By the way for a white man, he looks like black, but for a malian or a senegalese, he don't looks black, he looks pretty white.

That's the "curse" of mixed race people, you're always from the other race for almost everybody.

That's Obama :

That's the president of Senegal Macky Sall :

Compared to people like Macky Sall, he is a whitey boy and if he moves in a small african village, they will see him as a white man, not a black man.

 

I'd like to know why Conservatives are soooo obsessed about Obama's race.

who....cares!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

There is progressive racialist too. But on the most important you're right, even if I'm a traditionnalist which consider that honouring our ancesters and respecting them is important, in the end what matters is our heart.

 

So what part of " he looks black and acts white" offends you so much and is inaccurate?

 

It doesn't offend me. It's just boring for mixed racial people to be always considered as the other race. Considering black standarts, he is white, and the truth is that he look mixed.

 

some Conservatives will NEVER forgive Obama for being black.

the ODS is sick.

 

I see....so what I stated is accurate truth but boring.....Okay.

 

No, it's not accurate, Obama don't looks "black" but there is nothing to debate anymore, if you don't want to understand what is to be multiracial, don't understand, it's not my problem.

ODS ? Yes, there is idiots everywhere and in every political side. If we could make our cars run on idiots rather oil, filling up your tank would be cheaper than buying water and we would never lack of fuel.

 

Lol ..... pot meet kettle.

 

Of course I do not understand what being bi-racial as I am not. But in the context of this thread Obama looks black and the entire concept of "Looking Back" is completely subjective, I apologize that my comments seem to have touched a nerve. It is a pity that the topic of race has become so terribly warped into an anger magnet.

 

No problems. Anyway, I don't like the base of the topic, Obama should be considered only on his acts.

 

I'm not obsessing at all. It is the Democratic Party that non-stop obsesses about race. I am pointing out that their motive is racism, not opposition to it.

Defining Obama as the first bi-racial president (white-black) elected by both whites and blacks is the real RACE story - the one the Democrats NEVER will admit and furiously deny.

 

What a joke. The Democratic Party non-stop obsesses over race - and what race a person is.

Take the Zimmerman-Martin shooting. President Obama declaring Martin could have racially been his son - but then to the exact degree so could Zimmerman - who though 50/50 Latino-white, exactly opposite Obama the Democratic Party, Obama and leftwing MSM defined as Zimmerman as WHITE while hiding he is 50% Latino - picking his WHITE half, while always defining Obama as BLACK - picking his black half and hiding his white ancestry.

Bi-racial and multi-racial Americans - numbering now into the 10s of millions, blow away the Democratic Party's endless race-baiting and pursuing racial division, which requires putting each person into ONE racial category.

Calling Obama the first black-white bi-racial president elected by popular vote totally contradicts the America-is-racist stance of the Democratic Party.

 

And the Democratic Party will never stop denying Obama is white nor avoiding that he is NOT the prodigy of slaves, but rather the prodigy of black slave traders and white slave owners.

 

Did a Democrat post this thread trying to define Obama by his race or did YOU? Ain't rocket science.