Brennan considers legal action to stop clearance revocations

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by nra37922, Aug 19, 2018.

  1. nra37922

    nra37922 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2013
    Messages:
    13,118
    Likes Received:
    8,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    "WASHINGTON — Former CIA Director John Brennan said Sunday that he is considering taking legal action to try to prevent President Donald Trump from stripping other current and former officials' security clearances.

    Speaking on NBC's "Meet the Press," Brennan said he's been contacted by a number of lawyers about the possibility of an injunction in the wake of Trump's move to revoke his clearance and threaten nine others who have been critical of the president or are connected to the Russia probe."

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...p-clearance-revocations/ar-BBM7Y92?li=BBnbfcL

    Solution is to yank all clearances for anyone no longer a Federal employee. Then they can blame Brennan
     
    guavaball, Reality, Tim15856 and 2 others like this.
  2. AKS

    AKS Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,471
    Likes Received:
    4,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That makes no sense at all. You have any idea what it costs to obtain a clearance?
     
  3. nra37922

    nra37922 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2013
    Messages:
    13,118
    Likes Received:
    8,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yup, at least 25k and up depending on the level of clearance. BUT if your job no longer needs it bye bye. Otherwise, can I have mine back...
     
  4. straight ahead

    straight ahead Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2014
    Messages:
    5,648
    Likes Received:
    6,563
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Brennan will have to show how this has damaged him.

    "Your honor, how else am I supposed to make a living other than by going on liberal networks and bashing Trump? What else am I qualified for?"
     
  5. AKS

    AKS Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,471
    Likes Received:
    4,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If yours hasn’t expired then you still have it.
     
    mdrobster likes this.
  6. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,172
    Likes Received:
    20,953
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Better solution: Write as EO that all clearances are null and void upon departure from the federal government. You don't need a clearance to seek someone's advice. That mindset's incredibly stupid.
     
    navigator2, Reality, nra37922 and 2 others like this.
  7. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Costs zero to revoke
     
    Dispondent and Steve N like this.
  8. AKS

    AKS Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,471
    Likes Received:
    4,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Guess who gets to pay when people get new jobs. Think.
     
  9. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    70,978
    Likes Received:
    90,716
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He doesn't have any lawyers calling him about this, they'd be fighting in court over something that hasn't happened yet. He's trying to save face, he wants to be both the victim and hero at the same time.
     
  10. trickyricky

    trickyricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    305
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Nope. I actually have a “Q” clearance. They can. and will revoke my clearance my last day on the job. Actually, if I’m away from work over 30 days for any reason, including approved medical leave, I’m required to turn in my badge.
    They make it plain, even a DUI will get it revoked.
    So why does anyone of these clowns get to keep those? Because their access to inside information makes them money........
     
  11. AKS

    AKS Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,471
    Likes Received:
    4,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A clearance should be revoked for a dui. Financial irresponsibility and drug use can also get it revoked. Speaking out against the government will not. Oh and if you get another job within 2 years you won’t need to go through the investigation process. So, while the clearance isn’t active it IS current. Now contrast that to having it yanked. It’s a big deal and a slimy vindictive thing for a grown ass man to do in response to criticism. But trump is a b!tch so I guess we should all expect it.
     
  12. trickyricky

    trickyricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    305
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    They pull mine when I lwleave because I no longer "need" it to perform my duties.
    Why do unemployed, retired feds "need" one?
    And if they do, they can re-apply.
    Your statement about not being reinvestigated is false.
     
  13. AKS

    AKS Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    10,471
    Likes Received:
    4,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I take it you’re young? When I left Boeing for Lockheed I didn’t need to reapply for a clearance because I already had a current one. And this makes sense. Can you imagine the cost on the tax payer? I didn’t all of a sudden become unworthy to receive classified just because I left one job. It would also become much harder to hire because the backlog for the investigations are almost a year. And for what? So you can defend trump?
     
    Last edited: Aug 20, 2018
    mdrobster likes this.
  14. RichT2705

    RichT2705 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    28,887
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    LOL..there goes the left again, trying to pretend they have a right to everything.

    A simple question to put an end to his nonsense claim.

    If Brennan doesn't have Free Speech without said Security Clearance, then what Free Speech do any of us have?

    Exactly. No clearance required, and Brennan can speak as freely as he always has.

    Pure nonsense. Just a tantrum without merit, which will not prevail in court...but Brennan may waste money, and the courts time anyway. That's how the swamp rolls.
     
    Last edited: Aug 20, 2018
    Borat, Dispondent, goofball and 3 others like this.
  15. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    An injunction?

    Sure

    Find another liberal activist anti trump judge to upsurp the presidents power
     
  16. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Brennen no longer has a need to know government secrets
     
    JET3534, nra37922 and RichT2705 like this.
  17. webrockk

    webrockk Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    25,361
    Likes Received:
    9,081
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If one civilian is privy to the nation's secrets, all civilians are privy to the nation's secrets.
     
    nra37922 and RichT2705 like this.
  18. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Everyone with the same level of security is not allowed to see the same classified info

    Only those with a need to know are allowed access to certain areas

    Brennen lo longer has a need to know any classified information

    And the final decision for that belongs to trump
     
    Last edited: Aug 20, 2018
    JET3534 and nra37922 like this.
  19. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,368
    Likes Received:
    12,972
    Trophy Points:
    113
    brennan has every right to legally object to having his clearance revoked. if he is consulted for work, he would still need it.
     
    AKS likes this.
  20. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have to wonder why he cares unless he is using this information to further his career which is a misuse of said information
     
  21. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    meaning brennen needs access to classified documents so that he can earn a living and feed his family?

    Cry me a river buddy cause MacDonsls is hiring
     
    Last edited: Aug 20, 2018
  22. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,368
    Likes Received:
    12,972
    Trophy Points:
    113
    your petty anecdotes do not line up with the real world. in every industry, small and large, with someone like brennan, they would retained for consulting services.
     
  23. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly

    Brennen is out of government and has no need to know high level classified info
     
    Josephwalker likes this.
  24. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Brennen is not entitled to peddle classifed info to the highest bidder foreign or domestic
     
    Last edited: Aug 20, 2018
  25. ocean515

    ocean515 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    17,908
    Likes Received:
    10,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How much has Brennan's accusations regarding treason, etc., cost tax payers?

    And given his new profession, what harm has come to him? He has a network of "contacts" that don't even need to exist in order to spread the conspiracy narrative he is being paid to promote.

    Do you think Brennan has given a moments thought to what his actions are costing taxpayers?
     

Share This Page