The Pentagon on 9/11 - MODERATOR WARNING ISSUED

That's debatable...

 

Bob.

Questions were brought up, about things "YOU" posted.
And you have refused to answer them.

 

and I have made my thoughts clear on the preface and chapter 1 ... most of this has been discussed ad nauseam ...

now onto chapter 2 ... where the speculation ends and the real evidence begins ... at just the :48 mark, and I'm paraphrasing, correct me if I am wrong, the truth movement was misguided and failed to engage new research and barely a minute later ... he ends the Thierry Meyssan nonsense as cartoonish ...

I can break this down second by second if necessary ...

 

"Missing Wings" truth vid destroyed in the next few minutes ...

 

You've made your thoughts clear about everything about 9/11 as far as I know, you bought the OCT lock, stock and barrel and defend it nearly 24/7.

And will continue to be discussed for a very long time if I can help it.

There was nothing much speculative about what was presented in the Preface and Chapter 1 that I know of. And "real evidence" depends on what specific evidence you're referring to.

There were an awful lot of reasons for many to disbelieve that an airliner hit the Pentagon, there's nothing "cartoonish" about it. Much detailed research went into these videos, something that should have been done meticulously by official forensic criminal investigators. The secrecy, coverups, lies, omissions, etc. caused all sorts of speculation, this is normal when a government hides everything about a significant event such as 9/11. I'm still not entirely convinced that an airliner did impact the Pentagon but the videos do present some very reasonable details and arguments. Like I said many times before, even if an airliner did impact the Pentagon, that doesn't end the controversy by any means. There are still way too many questions and OCT claims that don't make any sense or are dubious at best.

That's your call but it's unnecessary.

 

in other words, you don't want to discuss anything in the videos beyond the preface and chapter 1 ... I already predicted that ...

 

The usual phony baloney. No it's you who doesn't want to discuss anything in any of the videos unless it's an attack on those who haven't bought the OCT. I responded to your "cartoonish" crapola although that wasn't the point or purpose of the videos and was even rejected at the beginning of Chapter 2 (Endless Pentagon Debates; How Did We Get Here). Bring up something adult and intelligent in the videos that doesn't include "troofer", "truther" or "conspiracy theory/ist" if you're capable. It's nearly impossible to discuss anything about 9/11 with you without you resorting to your "troofer" idiocy or some similarity

 

Says the guy who uses "OCT apologist" at almost every turn.

Come down of your pedestal Bobby.

 

Way to go ! Maybe not as educationally deficient from an Islam-Christiananality liberal marriage super ego as it seems, but then again could be putting on a patriot act as those burning Bush's & their SS, Rehnquist's immaculate drug conception supreme swastika up Uranus court, the Fuhrer's brainwashing inquisition, & the Federal Lynching churchstate of hate KKK cops. ​

 

Yes when that's what you and others like you do. The search for truth is a moral endeavor, there is nothing moral about defending lies, in this case nearly 24/7. And I know morality is in the eyes of the beholder so this is my personal morality and perhaps not yours. The idiotic term "troofer" is meant to ridicule those who demand the truth about 9/11.

No thanks, I refuse to stoop down to your level or bend over for liars and war criminals. Because after all 9/11 was the gift that keeps on giving for war criminals. At the end of the day that's exactly the people YOU and others like you are apologists to. So I have my morality and you have yours, whatever that is.

 

sure thing Bob ... having watched all the chapters, do you not think that the physical damage at and around the Pentagon is consistent with it having been hit by a rather large airliner? ...

 

According to what was presented in the videos there is a strong possibility, I'm not going to deny it. But I'm also not going to leap to the conclusion that it's proof. Unfortunately there is no real proof of anything about 9/11, not even that the 3 WTC buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition even though the science, evidence and most likely cause suggests they were.

 

I asked you a simple question ... no need to expound on your theories about the WTC ...

 

And I answered.

What you don’t need and what I want to post are nearly always on opposite ends of the pole. You don’t want me to post the obvious? That’s your issue not mine.

 

this thread is about the Pentagon on 9/11 ... please stay on topic ...

 

So some people, obviously a lot of them, planted tons of airplane parts, and molten slag in the building and on the grounds,
And nobody saw them do it.
Was it Sigfried and Roy.

 

I asked you a lot of simple Questions, and you have not answered any of them.

 

What can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Scott is better off left on ignore.

 

Like the debris belonged to AA77.

 

No, not like that. The overwhelming evidence of the crash proves exactly what it was.

I'll bet you didn't bother filing your name with the FBI to get all the evidence mailed to your house.
So If you didn't get the evidence, it didn't happen.

You're a hopeless troll, looking for people as ignorant as yourself to wallow in the muck you invented.

 

Why do you suppose the Fox reporter quickly on the scene, Jamie somebody, said it did not look like an airliner had crashed there? Why did the pictures taken support his claim?

Why do you suppose that April Gallop, working in the building and walking out through the scene, said she saw no sign of an airliner, no baggage, no bodies?

Why do you suppose the FDR was bogus?

 

As religiously of a patriot act that those burning Bush's liberal Christian SS business didn't go after Arab terrorists that threatened POTUS before 9/11 protecting & serving as those Federal Lynching churchstate cops what in all probability were the hijackers.....​

 

LOLOL
Had they ever seen an airliner crash before.
Because most everything, was in the building, in the oven.

There was stuff outside the building, just for you to look at, but you were too friggin lazy to go there and see it.
Did you think they would keep it there forever.

 

the so called debunkers aka gubmint trolls left the scene 5 years after the event and they have been replaced by posers that will say anything to feed their disinfo machine. They talk about all the evidence here and all the evidence there and when they cant find more than a drop of water they claim see here is a drop therefore there is an ocean, but it evaporated before we could document it. Then they quickly change the subject to evade admitting they have nothing but beer farts and belches. I can see why bob and others have no patience left for that level gomerism.

 

Another ignorant comment. Where do you people come up with this stuff.
Because the plane was in the building, and black smoke and fire was 100 feet out the hole.
She didn't just stroll through the scene.
Nobody saw the scene until the fire was out.