The one thing the Kavanaugh nomination has shown

Its a fact

 

Or democrats , who thinks they are a good idea?

 

I just don't think that it can be said often enough. Liberals are intent on destroying this nation. They couldn't care less, (hence the decided lack of evidence here) about the rule of law. They only care about being able to ram through their own version of social tyranny. I think that's clearly evident now. Liberals aren't interested in making sure we have qualified judges, they only want their ideological standard bearers on the courts. And now, their influence is diminishing, they are freaking out, publicly.

So, just remember libs.. when you were cackling thinking how cool Harry Reid was, clearly, this is now why you're so hysterical.

 

A.k.A. the rule of law how it was written .

 

You're supposed to ignore the evidence and blindly follow the group speak of the collective.

 

And Garyd, that is a very important point. It speaks directly to the sense of justice and honor of those pushing this game, and by that their total unfitness for office or power in a free country.

What we do is who we are; and to see that one has to back away from the hotpoint so to speak and take a full view of the game- to see how the game is being played, instead of just what card is on the table at the moment. When you do that, you get an entirely different picture of both this particular deal and the people behind it.

This shows us the gross absence of character behind this, despite the cloak of righteousness it comes wrapped in- and that is the hallmark of the deceitful and treacherous- not of honorable people. One has to be a classic fool to allow such people to gain power or influence, or to trust anything they do or say.

 

Obama's father and stepfather were atheists.. His paternal grandfather was a Catholic.

 

In Indonesia Obama attended a Catholic school and a co-ed international school founded by the Dutch. Come on, Mac.. Try to get something right. you look silly.

 

What will RUIN his reputation is that the state it occurred in at Yale, has NO statute of limitations, and Avenatti is contemplating a CRIMINAL case.

Try that on for size, on a sitting Supreme Court judge.

 

We can smell the desperation in these attempts to smear Kavanagh.

The Democrat party is jumping the shark and they are going to generate sympathy for him and his family.

 

You are obviously living in a dream world created by the lying liberal media.

How many elections do dems have to lose SINCE 2010, before it finally dawns on them that what they are doing is WHY they keep losing elections?

Steve

 

Yale law school has come out squarely against Kavanaugh.

 

PROVE IT!

Steve

 

They were muslims whatever their level of faith was

 

Yale has SHUT DOWN, so that the throngs of students can protest the nomination.

 

They were not Muslims.. and Obama went to Catholic school and then a co-ed international school founded by the Dutch. He never attended a Muslim school.

 

Go to Google news and take your pick from news articles.

 

"Throngs of students" is NOT YALE!

Stop believing every word and lie from the lying liberal media!

Steve

 

According to obamas autobiography he attended a muslim school for two years

 

First you were convinced trump was hoing to jail

Now its Kavanaugh

Dont you people ever learn?

 

You have literally *zero* idea what evidence exists in either instance. You -just like me- are an anonymous person on a procrastination site. Despite that, you've already rendered your judgment. Why?

Your willingness to take a middle distance stare over all the context to suit your preconceptions is also telling.

 

I apparently have a far better idea than you. The available witnesses say it didn't happen and there is no other evidence at this point in time. Regarding the cases of these two women.

 

How do you know this? How can you possibly say this? You have come to your conclusion loudly and prematurely. What's the rush? Shall I guess?

 

How many elections do dems have to lose SINCE 2010, before it finally dawns on them that what they are doing is WHY they keep losing elections?

Steve

 

Because it was thirty plus years ago and no evidence other than witness testimony can possibly exist since none was collected at the time. It is vaguely possible that some one took a polaroid thirty five years ago and kept it butI have my dobts and given the deterioration rate for polaroids it is unlikely that such would be legible enough to provide proof of much of anything by now. Also their is this thing called chain of custody without which any evidence would be inadmissable.