The numbers are in, and Trump's tax cut didn't reduce the deficit – despite his many promises

Discussion in 'Budget & Taxes' started by MrTLegal, Oct 16, 2018.

  1. k995

    k995 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, reality is almost everyone pays taxes.

    Even if you just look at income taxes (what you are probaly refer to) the 1% (that at the end is going to get 80+% of the tax cuts) they have 20% of income and pay 39% of income taxes.

    So no its quite easy to write tax cuts that would almost only affect that bottom 50%,in fact this tax cut alone would get rid of most of the taxes those people pay. Instead trump/GOP wrote it so trump himzelf an his rich friends and donors mainly benefited .

    I have no idea what you are talking about, care to give some quotes about that?

    I remember democrats saying this is a wealth transfer from the lowest incomes to the highest, and thats simply reality as every stat and fact has shown since that law was passed.

    And thats before trump/GOP starts cutting because they are creating a massive deficit .
     
    Marcotic and AZ. like this.
  2. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What a bunch of crap. Trump said reducing taxes would increase tax revenue and it did. The defecit is another issue entirely and is about government spending.

    "CNSNews.com) - The federal government collected a record $1,415,150,000,000 in individual income taxes through the first ten months of fiscal 2018 (October 2017 through July 2001 according to the Monthly Treasury Statement."

    https://www.cnsnews.com/news/articl...ndividual-income-taxes-through-july-still-run
     
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2018
  3. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,393
    Likes Received:
    39,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I quote the facts as to the Republican 2007 deficit of a paltry $161B before the Democrats took back the Congress. Aren't you one of the ones that make the misleading claims that the 2008 and 2009 deficits were Bush deficits?

    I think so.

    Yes they do.

    Came mighty close but then the Democrats took back the Congress and they never fame close to the WORST Republican deficits.

    Yes a Republican surplus.

    You left out the Gingrich/Kasich budgets. Why?
     
  4. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Spending and tax cuts are two separate issues. What's proven here is corporate tax cuts do indeed increase tax revenue
     
  5. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,393
    Likes Received:
    39,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And the premise if that is what? The last time the Democrats had budget and fiscal policy control they took a measly Republican $161B deficit to $1,400B in just two years and kept it at $1,000B for the next three it only coming down beause of Republican sequester and austerity.
     
  6. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,393
    Likes Received:
    39,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Not federal taxes which is the subject here.
     
  7. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,393
    Likes Received:
    39,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The financial collapse was taken care of with TARP by Bush and it didn't cost us anything and in fact we made money off of it.
    You want to get the budget back under control then make sure you vote for conservative Republicans in the mid-terms and not all these Democrats pledging free this and free that and policies that will shut down economic growth.
     
  8. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Uh...no. The economy recovered from a recession, but I don't know that "fixed" is proper.

    I am perfectly fine with cutting spending. For example, the funding for our military is currently larger than the next 7 or 8 countries combined. We also spend billions propping up industries like coal and gas.
     
    AZ. likes this.
  9. k995

    k995 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The topic is : "
    The numbers are in, and Trump's tax cut didn't reduce the deficit – despite his many promises'
    So nope
     
  10. k995

    k995 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What would it take to be "fixed"?


    And tax cut for the rich and corporations they used to buy back stock.
     
  11. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
  12. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,393
    Likes Received:
    39,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Residential housing is only about 3% of GDP. It was an across the board expansion. Then the Democrats in their failure to pass measures to help mitigate the coming recession and failed policies to get us into a full recovery increased spending 10% and then 20% and bragged about.
     
  13. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "Under 3%?" So how much did the total tax revenue increase? Because corporate tax Revenue fell by 31% and spending, as a percent of the economy, fell.

    If it weren't for Republican policies, the government would currently be running a budget surplus.
     
  14. k995

    k995 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes cutting taxes has nothing to do with a growing deficit.

    Trump promised he would get rid of the deficit AND the debt. So far he is only succeeding in enlarging both deficit and debt.
     
  15. ocean515

    ocean515 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    17,908
    Likes Received:
    10,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What a ridiculous claim. Prove it.
     
  16. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Again that's a different subject than tax cuts and whether the economic theory that cutting corporate taxes increases tax revenues works. It is doing exactly what Trump said it would just as it did for JFK and Reagan. It works every time it's tried.
     
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2018
  17. TomFitz

    TomFitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    40,737
    Likes Received:
    16,202
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your response was nonsense as gibberish. The deficit is exploding under Trump, a prediction that I made years ago, when I predicted on this forum that the next GOP President, would do exactly the same thing as two of the last three. I also predicted that the right wing would instantly go silent about debt and deficits.

    Both predictions are coming true.
     
    Marcotic and AZ. like this.
  18. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
  19. BuckyBadger

    BuckyBadger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    12,354
    Likes Received:
    11,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hopefully you mean a bonus and not just jacking up salaries.
     
  20. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,201
    Likes Received:
    9,562
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Good lord man. The fact that they can "bank their profits" tax free is because they bought the legislation to allow them to do that. You keep glossing over the fact that to have that low of an ETR, they have to report the income in the first place. The fact that they can defer profits, and park monies, and/or write those dollars off is a direct result of having the ability to do so thru favorable tax laws.

    Corporate donations to politicians are for one reason and one reason only, to benefit the financial position of that corporation. 90% of that benefit is derived by creating favorable tax legislation. You keep alluding to them somehow just taking advantage of the laws in place without admitting that they are the reason the laws are in place because they donated to political campaigns of politicians who will approve the legislation.
     
    AZ. likes this.
  21. ocean515

    ocean515 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    17,908
    Likes Received:
    10,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2018
  22. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I take you bolded that portion because that is precisely the point at which you stopped reading. You wanted proof, I gave you proof.

    But please, go listen to trump tell you that the tax cuts won't raise the deficit. I am sure that he is trustworthy.
     
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2018
    AZ. likes this.
  23. ocean515

    ocean515 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    17,908
    Likes Received:
    10,396
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Good lord man, do you understand the new tax laws?

    https://money.cnn.com/2018/01/02/investing/us-tax-companies-overseas-cash/index.html
     
  24. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The topic was spending cuts.
    Which cuts did they propose?

    My position is that rebups spend like democrats.
     
  25. k995

    k995 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    680
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No its not, trump and the GOP are responsible for everything. they are the ones in power and in control andits their measures that are driving up the deficit.

    Thats not true, bush tried it also. Actually trump did the same as bush: trickle down. It really didnt work then.

    Tax revenue has been going up every year under obama 2.1trillion to 3.27 trillion or 8% a year .

    Keeping the same increase last year trump should have had 3.53 and this year 3.82 trillion.

    Trump had 3.32trillion in 2017 and an estimated 3.42 for this year so he's far behind the main reason are the tax cuts and trump his increases in spending (like defense). They lowered revenue and didnt bring 6+% gdp growth you need to pay for them & increases expenses causing the defecit to balloon. Just like what happened under bush 43 .


    https://www.usgovernmentrevenue.com/year_revenue_2018USrn_19rs1n#usgs302

    https://www.thebalance.com/current-u-s-federal-government-tax-revenue-3305762
     
    ronv likes this.

Share This Page