I will believe the story once actual charges have been filed. I don't discount the idea that this might have been consensual.
Do you think Corey will have the stones to admit he's the first "out" senator? More, if he never does, what does that say about the politics of the left who continue to discount the viability of gay candidates in their party? Seems super inconvenient, and super hypocritical of the NDP where gay's are concerned....
Let me be perfectly honest ... Booker is not somebody I devote a lot of thought to. DNC spin ... even less. He's the laughing stock du jours ... period.
Again, you deny the context. Not unusual for political extremists on this forum; the Liberals will bitch and moan about Trump's ***** grabbing and adultery but when someone brings up Bill Clinton's rape, sexual harassment and adultery they quickly say "Red Herring!!! This thread isn't about Bill Clinton." I think they are weasels for not accepting the similarities and context of the situations when it comes to holding our government and officials accountable for their actions.
Just the right wing propaganda network of fake sites. You would think they would be ashamed of that. Of course quoting Gateway Pundit is bad enough.
Truly. He is. But it makes liberals look like they're just pandering when one of their own still isn't comfortable being out. But hey, it took a D.C P.D raid on Barney to get him out of the closet....
If it's not on Drudge it didn't happen. And the National Inquirer broke the Lewinsky story. I am Spartacus.
This is what I am talking about. The thread is about Cory Booker, which doesn't have anything to do with Benghazi. However, I bet you keep posting with this tantrum of yours about "mean conservative that doesn't think Booker should be investigated is being mean to you because he won't talk about Benghazi in a thread about Cory Booker."
I don't believe that Kavanaugh was placed under arrest nor charged with anything since it was only an allegation.
I always know when I'm winning a debate when people start making false claims and putting words in my mouth. LOL
I didn't put words in your mouth. You tried to divert with "waht about Benghazi" while tyring to put words in my mouth. Wasn't this your post where you tried to make a claim that I was " (inadvertently)" talking about Benghazi? You were literally trying to put words in my mouth. Be honest dude. I never mentioned Benghazi. You went off on a tangent.