It is beginning to look like I have as much as you do since your education has blinded you to a certain amount of reasoning. Open your mind and really think about as have many physicist who don;t agree with your take on it. Also my replies inside your reply.
Source on that? Is it really so hard to believe that the true motivation for the logo might have been the rings which are central to their operations (and which are designed as they are by necessity)? Oh and what makes you think that? What would you think it is instead? What reasoning exactly is that? I have personally monitored the experiments at CERN, and derived unexpected (so effectively unfakeable) results from the operations. How would that be possible with unexpected forms of energy? And I know plenty of people who have had insights into different bits of the operation to the point that subverting it would be very difficult (I'm not saying the people I know are incorruptible, but hardly the obvious choice if you want someone to keep their mouth shut).
So why would CERN not be connected to the Bible then? Like I said I'm just studying things and not sure of anythign at all. Lots of things going on today that makes no sense. They don't tell us anything anymore yet we are exposed to their whims and actions. Take chem trails for instance. Could all that be good for us or is it beneficial then tell us.
Why would CERN be connected to the Bible? If you waited for people to justify things as not connected, you end up believing all kinds of stuff is connected. Well, in this case, I am one of "them", and I'll happily tell you what you want to know. CERN is not free from auditors and management on lots of levels which would be obliged to send of signals if things weren't working as described. The work we do is specific and requires space and money, careful design and rigorous peer review, any "other energy forms" would take place and money and there are plenty of people who would flag it up.
This is just a total denial of the value of education and exploration. I really hope this idea is attractive to NOBODY in the entire world.
Aye Aye, Captain.. Who should go first? You or me? “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. 3 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye" Outside of 'Law' what is there to 'judge'? Judging to the 'law' as to why the 'Law' was placed up. In other words, the law says you must stop at a red light. For the safety and benefit of the others. I break this law by not stopping. I can get judged. But let us say that the 'law' says you must not take a right on red until you come to a complete stop first. So hollywood stops are wrong. So why judge my hollywood stop but not the breaking of the red light? Hypocrite? I say throw the ball, but when you do, I say, don't throw the ball. If the clock's second hand went 'counter clockwise', would that be hypocritical?
No it went major over 40 years ago and I'm still seeking. I can honestly say ' I've forgotten more about ancient history and Bible study than most will ever know'. I guess now it is just interesting.
You should concentrate on your promise to explain the errors and contradictions in the Bible as you promised. By the way. All Christians are judgemental. You judge people by your beliefs.