74% of Democrats...Comrade Ocasio-Cortex for President

Does Comrade Ocasio-Cortez know she has to be 35 to be POTYUS ?

How many Democrats know that ? I'm guessing 26%.

Well, that explains what happened to California.

 

2028, but according to her she close to death because of climate change.

 

For each and every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Elect a crazy moron like Trump and the reaction is a an equally disturbed Ocasio-Cortez.

 

"Would consider" is not the same as "would vote"

The question explicitly informs the person she is not old enough to be President currently.

And she's a Congresswoman from New York, so not sure how that "explains" California.

But I will say this, her 70% tax on the uber-rich proposal is supported by a much, much larger percentage of Americans when compared to Trump's wall proposal.

 

If Joseph Stalin was still alive today I'm sure he would be living in California today and 74% of the Democrats "would consider" voting for Comrade Joe for President.

 

Hitler would do well as a Democrat if he just changed "Jews" to "white people" in his speeches.

 

Very true.

Trump himself is a reaction to the 2010 midterm decision by the DNC to abandon their previous core base of the white working class in favor of a coalition of minorities, academics, and bureaucratic elites.

 

Actually Hitler rarely mentioned Jews.

Albert Speer who was Hitlers trusted friend and the only one Hitler trusted said he only heard Hitler mention Jews a couple of times.

It was the hard core Natioinalist Socialist who dealt with the "Jewish problem" and set up the extermination camps. These hard core nationalist socialist were socialist who were planning on nationalizing Germany's industries after the war.

Politically Hitler was a liberal not a hard core socialist like Himmler and Goebbels.

 

I for one would love a Cortez presidency. How hilarious would that be!

November 9, 2016 was the live comedy event of the century as far as I'm concerned. I sat back and watched CNN and MSNBC all day, it was an unmissable cavalcade of doomsdaying and obviously out of touch media elites.

Cortez' election would be a similar laugh.

 

Sad commentary on the raging masses - no doubt about it. On the Republican side you had a equally high percentage in the State vote for Roy Moore the pedophile - OK .. so the girls were slightly older than pedophile status but still ... Sad Commentary indeed.

 

I thought Roy Moore was vindicated ?

Judging the 1970's to today's PC standards is so cultural-marxism.

 

No he wasn't - and the addition of date and location to the yearbook thing 1) does not vindicate him and 2) came out after the election.
Roy was not a pedophile per say - he was however cruising high schools at the age of 32 - so to speak - a couple of his accusers were 14 at the time. 14 years old is below the age of consent (16) in Alabama but I would not classify this as pedophilia.

I agree with you to some degree in relation to PC standards and cultural-marxism. I also agree that comparing something someone did 30-40 years ago - on the basis of today's standards is patently absurd.

Elvis got with Priscilla when she was 14 and he was 24 for example. 24 and 32 is a fair difference but I will not make much of this. The difference is that Elvis was not running for high political office and that was in the late 50's - nearly 70 years ago vs the late 70's when Roy was cruising the high schools.

And again Elvis was not running for political office. Even by the standards of the day both Roy and Elvis were out of line.

The issue here though is that we are talking people (Republican Voters) who are the one's who are promoting "Family Values" in the most stringent way. Many of these folks are religious right fundamentalists folks who wear their religion on their sleeve like a flashing beacon. These are the one's - many of them- who claim that homosexuality should be a crime worthy of the death penalty - are 100% against premarital sex .. and so on.

The hypocrisy is so in your face that it is extremely hard to dismiss - as in anyone who claimed to hold such beliefs and did not realize the inherent hypocrisy of their actions (regardless of how they justified it) is too stupid to be voting in the first place IMO.

The point I am making is in relation to "Sad Commentary" .

 

74% of Democrats...Comrade Ocasio-Cortex for President
This opening statement for a thread demonstrates an inability to present a question for debate without including the opener's extreme bias on the issue. Insinuating that AOC is a communist because she supports Democratic Socialism, is totally inaccurate. I'm a Democratic Socialist and I have no use whatever for communism. Neither does she. This opening statement is disrespectful of a young, energetic, enthusiastic, caring, conscientious politician, who I would enthusiastically vote for if she were old enough to be a candidate for President of the U.S..

 

Well, she will be old enough to run for president in a few years. Time flies when you're having fun. And serving in the House of Representatives is fun. Just ask Pelosi.

As for communism vs democrat socialists, Free college and healthcare is one thing, but how long before the calls go out for the government to take over private companies???

 

Several long-term successful Democratic Socialist countries in W Europe offer evidence that your fears are groundless. No "socialist" or communist country ever succeeded if it nationalized private businesses. No Democratic Socialist would ever dream of such a thing. I certainly wouldn't.

 

Truman did when he took over the US steel production with Executive Order No. 10340.

That would make you incorrect.

 

Trump is doing a good job imitating Hitler ....same methodology and same non thinkers following him

 

First, he failed. Second, he wasn't trying to kill private enterprise, but simply trying to keep a desperately needed steel production going because he felt it was critical to the country & its security.

 

And how well would Hitler have done if he had changed "Jews" to "Germans"? which is pretty much what you're suggesting here.

Jews in Germany were something around 5% of the population. White people in America are and remain the dominant race here with about 60 to 75 % of the total

Hitler was able to kill all the Jews and others because the Germans were the unquestioned majority in Germany, the "Deutsch", "volk", "people", "race".

This idea that the whites in America are being taken over by the minority races is so ****** ridiculous that it actually doesn't get real consideration even by its own proponents. The only people who believe it are ****** losers too stupid to realize how truly asinine a proposal it is.

 

Oh bullshit too. Semantics and a dollar will get you a good laugh at Starbuck's

Hitler didn't mention Jews by name a lot that's true, one euphemism he used for them I know of was "pawnbrokers", since many Germans had been badly used by them during the hyperinflation. Just so, Trump is careful to call Hispanics "illegals" and to go on about how he really just loves all people of Spanish extraction. He and his minions are not fooling anyone, though, just like the Nazis, they can be good at making people feel better about their naked and vicious bigotry.

 

People without a real life and were indoctrinated in revisionist history spend a lot of time at Starbucks.

 

I wouldn't know. I'm a Dunkin man myseff

 

This coming from the guy who tried to excuse Hitler's role in atrocities. Hell, dude - Hitler started a war that killed over 60 million people and you're trying to blame his minions. Talk about "revisionist" history.

 

Actually the war ended when Poland was defeated by Germany and the Soviet Union.

The revisionist always fail to mention that Germany invaded Poland from the west while the Soviet Union invaded Poland from the east.

It was France and England who declared war on Germany.

 

What came first : Hitler's invasion of Poland or the declaration of war? The Soviets didn't invade Poland until 17 days after Hitler did.
Who fired the first shots of the war? Hitler torpedoed a British cruise ship carrying 112 civilians.
So again, why were you defending Hitler?