Could the EU force Britain to pay the £39bn Brexit bill after no deal?

Discussion in 'Western Europe' started by cerberus, Feb 2, 2019.

  1. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,530
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2019
  2. reallybigjohnson

    reallybigjohnson Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Messages:
    8,849
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have to say that the UK is handling the Brexit process absolutely terribly. The very first thing they should have done was work out bilateral trade deals with the US, Canada, Japan, Korea etc similar to how the US trades with many countries. The UK was a net exporter in the EU which is so their advantage when leaving the EU and striking deals. Instead we get incompetent boobs trying to play nicey nice with the EU and dragging out an already long process even longer and making it more difficult than it needs to be to not hurt any feelings. Sorry but this is just like breaking up with your girlfriend. Both sides are going to get hurt a bit but in the long run its better cause its not healthy. The EU is a sick, emotionally stunted mommy's boy constantly telling his girlfriend what they are going to do or eat.
     
  3. Jim Nash

    Jim Nash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    2,528
    Likes Received:
    830
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    With no deal "only" about 16 billion is liable, the remainder being EU fees until December 2020. That 16 billion is commitments already made (pensions etc) which you could argue it's morally in order to pay, but without an agreement there doesn't seem any mechanism for it.
     

Share This Page