Trump Accuses Democrats Of 'Executing Babies After Birth

There are millions that are adopted every year. Just a false flag of fake news.

 

yes they have, and what is the difference between my human genetics and survival from 30 seconds from being born to 6 years of age. Was I not the same person 30 seconds before being born and 6 years of age? The only difference is LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION. You are the same person today you were at 6 years of age, 20 years of age, or 7 months in the womb. Same genetics, same person. Only age and location have changed. Should we be allowed to "abort" humans at say, the 40th trimester? What is the difference? Nothing except age has changed. Further, when an old person has Alzheimer's, are not self unaware, and can be aborted in the 300th trimester. A slippery slope many who are pro genocide of children may eventually find themselves in, and well deserved.

 

Democrats want planned parenthood to legally harvest human baby parts.

The longer they can keep the baby alive the more valuable its parts become.

Killing them 2 weeks to a month after their born before they kill them can increase the profit 10 fold.

 

Democratic Progressives want to abort White Male babies born in America, if it's a muslim baby born to an Isis Bride or a Mexican Anchor baby it's safe.

 

Which does not change the fact that it’s still 6 weeks prior to what is considered late term.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
There is NOTHING more deplorable and despicable then comparing the absolute horror, the unbelievable suffering, loss, and death of actual people in concentration camps and else where under the Nazis,

with the quick painless death of a fetus …


How sick to denigrate what those people went through by making it seem like it was as quick and painless as the death of an aborted fetus...


Righties will scream about "killing BAAAAABIES!" but not mind when BROWN babies are put in cages...

The total lack of knowledge displayed in that post is too mind boggling...

to support Hitler's killing of Jews by stating , "" At least Hitler's "gas chambers" were quick and painless,""....is beyond the pale....

 

Hilarious,,,,, laying yourself open to the fact you have no idea what pregnancy and child birth entail......have no idea what happens to a fetus during birth....or even WHY!!!!

Did you know there's a reason a fetus spends 9 months inside a woman?

If it's just floating around, for no reason, unattached with no connection to the woman ...then WHY is it in the woman?

Can it be kept in a bucket of warm water for 9 months and grow?

Do you really think that ??!!!



You think what women go through, and sometimes die for, in childbirth, is just a "change of location"....tell that to the loved ones of women who DIED in childbirth...

Then, to give your posts some credibility, learn exactly what happens as a woman and fetus approach and conclude birth.....

I know you won't because I think you'd rather just rant...

 

Trump Accuses Democrats Of 'Executing Babies After Birth.

No he criticized democrat politicians for supporting the practice. It is murder as defined by law. Why shouldn't he criticize it?

 

The culture of death. The abortion toll is now ten times the holocaust body count, and counting.

 

So what!?

That only proves that millions of women retained the right to their own bodies! YEAHHHH!!!!

The holocaust happened when people lost the right to their own bodies.

 

and when the baby is no longer inside the mother? in no way part of the mothers body? does the mother still have the right to kill or let the baby die?
because that is what the hell we are talking about what the topic of the thread is
an alive baby out side the mothers body a failed abortion survivor there for born alive which you are still defending the mothers right to murder

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
So what!?

That only proves that millions of women retained the right to their own bodies! YEAHHHH!!!!

The holocaust happened when people lost the right to their own bodies.

SHOW me exactly where in this law you're talking about does it say a woman can kill her healthy newborn baby for any reason.


BTW, you did NOT address nor refute ONE word of the post of mine you quoted

 

yes having your limbs turn off one by one and you head crushed is painless

 

what law

republicans are trying to pass a law that requires doctors to give medical attention to abortion survivors because right now they aren't requires by law to do so
a law you are against or at least your party is against
you are implying a mother and doctor still can perform a abortion outside the mothers body

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
There is NOTHING more deplorable and despicable then comparing the absolute horror, the unbelievable suffering, loss, and death of actual people in concentration camps and else where under the Nazis,

with the quick painless death of a fetus …


How sick to denigrate what those people went through by making it seem like it was as quick and painless as the death of an aborted fetus...


Righties will scream about "killing BAAAAABIES!" but not mind when BROWN babies are put in cages...









The total lack of knowledge displayed in that post is too mind boggling...

to support Hitler's killing of Jews by stating , "" At least Hitler's "gas chambers" were quick and painless,""....is beyond the pale....

Who said it was? And why are you posting something so ridiculous...???


And what has it to do with abortion? Nothing. Most abortions happen before a fetus can feel pain....and if an abortion is necessary after they can feel pain an anesthetic is used...…


Try facts at least once in a while....

 

Bunk. https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/the-scientific-evidence-that-babies-feel-pain-as-they-are-aborted

There's a reason babies try to squirm and avoid the instruments of death. Dr. Mengele would be proud.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
SHOW me exactly where in this law you're talking about does it say a woman can kill her healthy newborn baby for any reason.

SHOW me exactly where I said a woman or doctor can perform an abortion outside a woman's body?

I didn't so you can't....yet you said it anyway, how odd!
BTW, it is impossible to perform an ABORTION outside a woman's body.

And YOU DID NOT

SHOW me exactly where in this law you're talking about does it say a woman can kill her healthy newborn baby for any reason.

But you quoted that post...why??

 

Oh, I'm sorry if you don't like facts and science but they trump your mere opinion....


Maybe you could look up "reflex actions"....but you probably won't, it would blow your opinion to pieces

 

ok I will come right out and ask do you disagree with a law requiring doctors to give medical attention to survivors of late term abortions? or do you think a doctor and mother have the right to allow the newborn to die with no medical attention?
no spin no distractions just a simple yes or no answer

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
SHOW me exactly where in this law you're talking about does it say a woman can kill her healthy newborn baby for any reason.


SHOW me exactly where I said a woman or doctor can perform an abortion outside a woman's body?

I didn't so you can't....yet you said it anyway, how odd!
BTW, it is impossible to perform an ABORTION outside a woman's body.

And YOU DID NOTSHOW me exactly where in this law you're talking about does it say a woman can kill her healthy newborn baby for any reason.

But you quoted that post...why??

Sure, just as soon as you address my post and questions...

 

Expect an answer along the lines of "we can't fully comprehend the purpose of god" or something similar. However, when the invisible sky man worshippers want to push something, i.e., their agenda, they claim they are supporting god's purpose.

 

Or how a bout the incredibly lame " God works in mysterious ways"......another cop out

 

Holy generalization Batman!!!

 

In cases where a baby is so deformed to the point of possibly not being viable then yes, of course the mother should have the choice of either ending her child's pain and misery or prolong the misery for it to possibly survive to then live a life of just existing because of its severe deformities. To me this is no different than assisted suicide for a person who has a terminal painful disease. Why prolong the misery? At this point someone living with a painful terminal disease isn't actually "living", they are just existing. Let these people die with some level of dignity.