Barr: "it does not exonerate him"

Will Rodgers once said: “I am not a member of any organized political party.....I’m a democrat”. If anyone can figure out a way to screw themselves, these New Democrats will figure it out. Like I said, a year and a half is an eternity in politics....

 

True but that's all hypothetical, it's an investigation in search of a crime. With everything Mueller looked at and considering he convicted 6 people for similar offences in the course of the investigation it seems unlikely.

 

Because that's what Mueller was all about?

 

Why not, worked last time? And for Bill Clinton/Obama?

 

Sure Cohen is a done deal? If he had anything he'd have given it up by now to spare himself jail?

 

And here's you praying for a massive economic blight to strike your own country.

The absolute state of the left today.

If I can't have it my way, then a pox upon my own house!

 

You were equally hopeful about collusion and obstruction

Libs are sore losers

 

Hope and Change. LOL

 

LOL, Andre Carson's statement basically questions Barr's honesty. The new tact.

 

One of the things this report does it put a spotlight on the sham dossier that democrats created and #NeverTrumpers like McCain helped spread.

 

Over two years of investigation by the FBI and Mueller and the conclusion is that Trump is not a traitor. Many on the left are very upset by this.

One wonders about what kind of patriots they really are.

 

Your own Lame Stream Media is saying Mueller punted on the obstruction. Problem is.....if there is no Collusion. There is nothing to Obstruct on.

All you got left is the Demo Committees wasting people money and time.

The worse the SDNY can hook Trump with anything. Is a campaign finance violation and that would be going against what those in the FEC are saying.

 

As many times as is necessary for you to convince yourself it's true...........but it isn't.

 

Come back to reality.


Well, it’s done. It’s here. The report is in, we said no collusion was etched in its pages, and the preliminary summary given to us by Attorney General William Barr backed it up. There was no collusion between the Kremlin, Trump, or his campaign staff during the 2016 election, despite nearly two years of the liberal media lusting for this to be true. There was no collusion and Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein felt there wasn’t enough evidence to pursue charges against Trump in obstruction of justice. Regardless, Trump is vindicated. Trump was right. And his supporters now have zero reasons to believe anything the news media says on this matter after two years of peddling straight Russian collusion trash as if it were fact; looking at you MSNBC, CNN. The meltdown was delicious. It was probably the worst since the 2016 election. Trump won. It once again adds to the man’s life story; never bet against when you think he’s down. GRANTED…half the nation already knew the Russia collusion myth was garbage. We’ve known for over two years. So, it makes this moment even more satisfactory for Trump, his supporters, and the GOP. We win again. Our side was right. The Left can eat crow…and I hope they choke on it. We have MSNBC’s Joy Reid suggesting that there could be a cover-up with this report. MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow apparently cried when it became clear the report would not contain incriminating evidence against Trump. Chris Matthews was just irate. And former intelligence operative Malcolm Nance, ignoring the report, said what Trump did could “eclipse Benedict Arnold.”


Jerry Dunleavy @JerryDunleavy




Three big takeaways:
(1) Mueller did not find that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians to interfere in 2016.
(2) Mueller didn't reach a conclusion on obstruction one way or the other.
(3) Barr & Rosenstein concluded Trump didn't obstruct justice.https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/mueller-clears-trump-no-russia-collusion-no-obstruction-of-justice … …..snip~


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...o-collusion-and-the-liberal-media-is-n2543621

 

Nope. Mueller concluded there was insufficient evidence of collusion to bring a charge of such. That judgement has no bearing on Don taking his benefactor's side on the matter of whether Russia interfered in our election on Don's behalf.........which Mueller's report makes clear was the case.

Lots of Trumpers are getting quite carried away at the moment, making all manner of assertions that have no basis in truth. As usual, they're following Don's lead who falsely claimed Mueller's report completely exonerates him. It doesn't. Nor does it excuse the treasonous act, in front of the world, of undercutting the conclusions of our intel agencies and instead taking the word of a murdering despot who leads a country that is our enemy. Maybe Don is still angling for a Tower in Moscow.

 

No evidence of collusion means no evidence of collusion. Mueller's findings on 'obstruction' made the claim of not exonerating him but Rosenstein and Barr decided there is not enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he obstructed so no prosecution. Sucks to be a sufferer.

 

Correct.....no evidence means no evidence. It doesn't mean there might be some evidence. It doesn't mean maybe there is still some evidence. It doesn't mean there could possibly still be some evidence.

What the leftness fails to comprehend is.....When they say its over. Its over. Means done. Finito.

 

Except for Donnie J's meeting.

Barr made that decision back in December.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/document-william-barr-memo-obstruction-investigation

 

LOL, have you read the report? Do you know how many people were involved in investigating this before and during Mueller?

And as always. Nothing.

 

Dissing Rosenstein now? Weren't you guy whining about anyone doing that before? Ah, hypocrisy.

 

What we are seeing is the left doing their usual. Looking to play off terminology. MSDNC and CNN are getting hammered. Even Liberals are saying Trump has been vindicated.

If I was Graham.....I would subpoena in Nadler and Schiff. Then make life very difficult for them. Look to hook them up on ethics and process crimes.

 

Comey - “So many questions.”

Graham - “Could not agree more. See you soon,”

 

Actually these are crimes. So it is more accurate to say these are crimes committed by criminals and suspected criminals. It's the suspected part that demands investigations.

 

Yeah it does exonerate him..

I believe the left's maniacal obsession will be their undoing.

Next up, the investigation in the Senate of the people responsible for this fabricated treasonous effort. They are the ones who had better have lots of money to pay for the attorneys they will need to hire.

 

The attempted COUP. It was done by Comey, McCabe, Ohr, Clapper, Brennan, Rice, Strzok, Page, Yates, et al. All need to be investigated after 3 years and millions spent on this hoax.