CBS: Caitlyn Jenner to pose nude for Sports Illustrated cover

It’s not she, it’s he. It’s not transgender, it’s cross dressing. This comes at a time when SI has put a fully clothed, head to toe, model in their bikini issue.

Social engineering at its best.

To the people who care about feelings...the guys Jenner beat in the olympics, imagine their feelings.

 

That's like real icky. Yuck.

 

Icky and yuck make libs beam with pride.

 

That's ridiculous.

 

Someone has mental issues, so what. To each their own.

 

Gross

 

Great, so we agree. Caitlyn's visage would be more appropriate on the cover of Psychology Today or Modern Prosthetics.

 

Yes.

 

Knowing that most men would rather not see this, SI does it anyways.

Why?

It's certainly not an economic decision. It's subversion.

Anytime there's a progressive, anywhere, who's involved in the decision making process, they're going to prosytilize their woke religion of progressivism. Instead of telling you that you'll burn in hell for eternity if you don't repent, they'll call you a racist/bigot/phobe and try to ruin you professionally/financially.

So enjoy the burkinis and grotesque chicks with dicks... bigot.

 

Kinda like this?

 

LOL............... lately the National Enquirer has more credibility than SI. First, muslims in frog suits, now this!

 

CBS: Caitlyn Jenner to pose nude for Sports Illustrated cover,

That is disgusting.

 

wearing "nothing but an American flag and her Olympic medal," Us Weekly reported.

^If Jenner is "wearing an American flag" and medal, then Jenner is NOT "NUDE".

Fake News.

That is like saying:

"Mother Teresa will appear NUDE on SI Cover wearing nothing but her Nun's Habit".

Funny how that works.

 

Take it up with CBS.

 

That article is 3 YEAR OLD.

It was just recently recycled at a RW BS Twitter Acct.

Don't you even feel a bit foolish?

Running here to post FAKE "NEWS" (from 2016) just because you "saw it on the internet"?

Not a good look.:smh:

Especially, in terms of future credibility (when you start other OPs).

Why are you posting an article from:

May 5th, 2016 in Current Events?

Was it just some BS that you came across at a RW BS Site and you just rushed here to post it (without even checking the date)?

I would suggest (in the future) that you do a better job of vetting (or at least actually reading an article) before you rush here and post a 3-Year-Old article in "Current" Events.

(Not a good look, even in terms of "RW BS Factory Threads").

Posting a 3-Year-Old article as a Current Event?

You can't make this stuff up.

Also, totally LMAO at anybody who commented on this article (not even reading the date, or the article), don't you feel even a tiny bit embarrassed?

3 YEARS OLD? In "Current Events"?

 

Epic FAIL.

Jenner Posed 3 YEARS AGO.

This was from 2016.

"comes at a time..."

 

Who is her sponser…...Snap-on-tools.

 

It's OK to date a nun once in a while.

Just don't get in the habit.

 

Too funny!

It shows how mindlessly the rw media nut farm operates.

 

Good one.

Maybe someday SI will get a Nun to "pose NUDE" wearing only a habit?

 

Honestly, even in terms of "blindly posting any BS that comes across your social media feed" this deserves Platinum Status.

This thread might be the most glaring example (of the type of thread that you mentioned) that I have ever seen in over 3 years at PF.

^(And that is a Really HIGH Bar).

How can someone post an article WITHOUT even reading the date?

I noticed that immediately upon hitting the link.

And, what about all of the RW Echo Chamber that commented (as if this was RECENT News)?

Not a good look for some of PF's RW.:smh:

A very embarrassing episode (for everyone involved).

This is going to be a hard one to live down.

Especially the idea that this happened in the context of the Burkini photo.

Just wow.

I am honestly at a loss for words trying to process this thread's Monumentally Epic FAIL.