Alabama’s Draconian Abortion Ban Has Women On Twitter Ready To Fight

As ususl the left only cares about the woman rather than the unborn human life

 

There is nothing "fuzzy" about it at all scientifically or medically.

 

false
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fetus
an unborn or unhatched vertebrate especially after attaining the basic structural plan of its kind specifically : a developing human from usually two months after conception to birth

 

We kill humans all the time, Liberals want to minimize it and divert it to those least likely to suffer, Conservatives want to use it for political purposes

 

As usual the right only cares about woman not having rights over their own reproduction on religious or ideological grounds and couldn't care less about the poor child who they will gladly condemn to a miserable life with draconian social policies.

Force women to bear unwanted children and then condemn the kid to a life of neglect and poverty.

Nice.

 

As usual, the religious are ready to sacrifice the living for their version of the "God's Will".

 

So it is part of the woman, for not being able to be without a separated placenta in the womb.

because it's called a fetus.

 

False.
We all know the right is exceptionally hostile with single parent families in a fiscal way, as what you get when a woman gets raped.


The right also has no problem that women should be able to protect themselves with a weapon. And in case it happens, kill the rapist. But killing what the rapist left behind, and it suddenly is a no. What an ill joke.

 

They should not get pregnant they can use birth control or abstain from sex and men can keep his penis in his pants and cover it or not use it. Unless there is a fatal flaw in the unborn or her life is in danger there is no need for killing the baby in the mothers belly or what its not a good time or not desired such selfish reasons to murder a baby. Its bad enough for the narrow reasons and thanks to modern medicine that will get narrower and narrower.

 

Love your "South forty" example. Pro-lifers are trying to elevate the fetus into a person. I'm old enough to have seen women change into having a full sense of themselves as just as good as men (they always were, of course) and I know damn well they aren't going to permit men to control their bodies. I'm with 'em. On this issue, they lead and I follow.

 

Imagine if they put that much effort into not getting pregnant in the first place.

 

I encourage women to ignore the gun grabbers and not only own a gun but use it on any man that tries to rape them

 

What are you babbling about?

I support the death penality which is the killing of criminals guilty of serious crimes

But unborn children are guilty of nothing except existing

 

Using your goofy liberal logic why not kill all the fatherless children in the hood?

Arent they leading miserable lives too?

 

You are the one invoking God, not me

 

You're childishly avoiding that you don't mind killing a rapist, but do mind killing what the rapist left behind.
And that right wingers are known for not supporting single parent families.

 

Why do you suppose humans keep track of birthdays?

Does birth have any significance, or should things be changed to "date of conception"?

 

You kill not just criminals but soldiers and civilians in wartime, who are guilty of nothing but being born in the wrong place. More importantly, every time you turn on a light switch or step on your accelerator you kill some infinitesmial fraction of some human somewhere.

I am not babbling, I am talking about real humans actually walking about somewhere, while you go on about a spoonful of meiotic cells which you say is worth ruining my wife or daughter's lives over

 

Since FORCING a woman to carry a rapist's child is a second rape - I agree.

 

Behold, the REAL reason conservatives are against abortion. SEX is a dirty and evil SIN, how DARE the godless suggest it can be done without the PENALTY of children as a spectre overhanging

What really ought to be illegal is being religious, how much better off we'd all be.

 

Imagine that!

 

Abstain? Uh huh. What if birth control fails?

It's not a baby. If the woman doesn't want a child, that seems like a pretty good reason.

It's not a baby, nor is abortion "murder."

Modern medicine had made abortion possible without a surgical procedure.

 

It fits the definition of "fuzzy concept" (reference) whether or not you care to accept it.

 

In re the "unborn"

SCIENTIFICALLY, they aren't "children" or zygotes or fetuses, they ARE made of human cells and pretty much utterly dependent on the mother until the third trimester.

And SCIENTIFICALLY they are therefore GROWTHS. They are warts and/or moles, no real difference. In fact, cloning techniques can now clone a being from a wart.

So I guess we now need to arrest any woman with a bottle of CompoundW for conspiracy to murder.

 

On the contrary, I believe it would be wrong to end a human life through an abortion. My point had been that there is no specific point in fetal development that unequivocally demarcates the beginning of an individual human life. Opinions are not facts.