Why Nancy Pelosi is absolutely correct. We need the AMERICAN PEOPLE behind us.

Nancy Pelosi is trying to slow 49% of the US population from acting prematurely. She is called every name in the book. She is arguably as interested in removing Trump as any human alive.

It wouldn't do any good to have an impeachment. But, the preliminary steps are simply investigation. With subpoenas. That Pelosi is 100% FOR. And what comes is what comes of it. And what response it elicits in the rest of the US population, is critical.

I agree. The pressure of the US population, is enough to get ANY Trump politician to buckle like our infrastructure. Without it, the effort will be deemed partisan.

As Obama said, of several things we thought he should GET DONE by now. He said, MAKE ME. That is the forgotten responsibility in all this. WE THE PEOPLE must speak.

And when we are enough to say what goes, it goes. Not until. No matter that crimes have been committed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senate GOP vows to quickly quash any impeachment charges


"I think it would be disposed of very quickly," said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...any-impeachment-charges/ar-AABZDYv?li=BBnb7Kz

 

Nancy is right....the problem is the DNC just doesn't have the support of the American people.

 

YEt, you too.

 

I wish Nancy and Chuckie would work on the nation’s real business.

 

If Pelosi's goal was to get American people behind her, Nancy wouldn't be importing 100K a month from Guatemala and Honduras. Pelosi wants more Americans beneath her, lying on the sidewalks wallowing in feces.

 

Just because the Trump gang cant shoot straight, does not mean the Dems are likewise. Our gov is big enough for OVERSIGHT, and legislatin'. As it MUST, that is EXACTLY what was intended. They didn't have a gov that is one task hobbled. That is Trump, and how nothing gets done, unless he shoves it. That is pure autocracy. YOUR problem, not the Dems.

 

Check the record. McTurtle has refused to consider most of the over 200 bills the House has passed. Some of which are major pieces of legislation. Schumer can't do a thing about it.
How do you suppose you came to be confused about that?

 

FYI, you don't have an impeachment investigation without calling for impeachment first so the dem clown show rolls on.

 

Yeah...like the House Bill saying it's a necessity to pass the Green New Deal, without actually passing the new Green Deal....the Senate was ready to take that up

 

You can call it GRAND JURY TESTIMONY in public.

 

In the guise of an impeachment investigation because Mueller and three other investigations found nothing. The dem clown show rolls on.

 

There are TEN instances of obstruction of justice to investigate, money crimes. BAd campaign finance crimes. And, all the bad form, bad manners, bad faith, bad decorum and just plain bad managing, to go thru, as being an inept fool, is most certainly a high crime and misdemeanor.

 

LOL, sure. I am not sure if you understand what a prosecutor does. If there were evidence of any of those that would have been in the report.

 

LOL, it ISSSSSSSSSSSS in the report. REad it?

 

Must be why it states not enough evidence right?

 

Yes.

Impeachment is due, which means a thorough public investigation of the specifics of the Mueller report, and with all the rights and privileges normally granted an impeachment proceeding. What Pelosi is implying and allowing uninformed people to believe, is that impeachment mean acting on proven charges and known, proven crimes to remove the president from office. That is NOT impeachment. Impeachment is first and foremost a thorough public investigation.

 

Yet, none of it worth pursuing? Trump would have been charged by now. A bunch of armchair partisan hacks, with no other purpose besides getting rid of bad orange man, want to choose to do what the guy THEY ALL put in charge wouldn't? How convenient? This is like the SSM Bill passed in CA back in the day. They let all the people vote a few times and it never passed. So instead they took it to the Supreme court and ignored the will of the people, even in CA, and passed it instead. By any means necessary, eh?

 

The report DOESN'T state "not enough evidence". It states that the DOJ guidelines say they do not indict a sitting president, and THEREFORE it would be inappropriate to list Trump's crimes and evidence for them if he cannot appear in court to defend himself. Do you understand now?

 

See my last post here. And BTW, the Democrats have been clear that they want to pursue what Mueller found and complete those investigations, but your side opposes transparency. It's so hard to hide crimes if you have transparency.

 

When it’s shown the entire Trump-Russia affair was based on fraudulent crap perpetrated by leftists unwilling to accept the 2016 election, Trump will become a sympathetic figure (a victim). No impeachment will be possible.

 

By all means, please investigate. In fact, run your entire campaign on Trump corruption. I have absolutely no interest in talking the Democratic party out of harming itself politically.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybe...investigation-say-theyve-seen-enough-n2546782

 

That is exactly why the facts are needed, and that means complete transparency.

 

Why do you make having a bunch of crooks working for him MY problem?

 

From your link:
"While a clear majority of the public supports getting more details about the Mueller report, just over half (52%) say that Congress should move on to other issues now that the investigation has concluded."

Very clear results, huh?

 

Similar psychology to this in inverse.

If you throw me in the Briar patch, you will NEVER catch me. Go ahead, throw me in the briar patch, SEE what happens.