Alabama’s Draconian Abortion Ban Has Women On Twitter Ready To Fight

Because it's the only one which ends the life of potential person. If there are any others, please inform us.

I don't, but abortion isn't healthcare in most cases. And abortion should be available if the mother's life is at risk.

 

The maximal-statist fanatics who rage that politicians must invade the personal realm of Americans, dictating to them rather than allowing them to make their most private decisions, informed by medical experts, spiritual advisers, friends, and family, must not be allowed to savage freedom in the US.

They can proselytize and shout their belief that a microscopic, mindless amalgam of cells is a person all they wish, but must not be allowed to impose their notion upon everyone via the coercive power of the State.

In Canada, where the politicians were excluded from the matter, doctors determine the medical propriety and, with the obstructions contrived by those politicians removed, abortions are performed at an earlier stage, and the number of abortions being performed has decreased.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
And you think every woman that has an illegal abortion doesn't know it's an abortion and illegal ???

Ok, good so far, that IS what they would probably know...

LOL! What TF does that have to do with your "mens rhea" ?? Did it occur to YOU that YOU will not be deciding what women know or don't know .
? That you have NO way of knowing what every woman thinks or knows?? You don't....you do NOT know what they know.


Now, back to your theme that all women are so stupid they don't know that having an illegal abortion means...they do, and if one hires someone to commit a crime they are BOTH guilty..

 

potential [pəˈten(t)SHəl]: having or showing the capacity to become or develop into something in the future.

"Potential" people are no more people than acorns are oak trees.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
""""What conservative is against asylum? """

Oh, so sorry about your world and the small size that doesn't allow news to enter....in mine, conservatives as a group have been in the news, TV, newspapers, internet screaming against asylum....constantly , hard to miss even if one is locked in one's home.


But this seems to be your style : Have no point, so concentrate on a meaningless point;

 

What is the "government's health system" that you keep mentioning ?

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
A woman should be able to get an abortion for any reason she chooses

Uh, is there some kind of problem??

There is only one way to say,


"" Women can get an abortion for any reason they choose."""


That is English, clear, precise...there is NO question what it says or means unless one has NO knowledge of the English language whatsoever,

And THAT wasn't clear English….why would a woman force herself to become pregnant against her will which IS what your sentence says.

 

NO, RvW does NOT make abortion a right.....where TF did you get that idea???

And that brings up the next question on nailing down Anti-Choicers into saying why they are against abortion.



WHY don't you want abortion to be a right?

WHY don't you think women should have a right to abortion?

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Why would the "government" treat that legal medical procedure any differently than any other legal medical procedure

So men who have a vasectomy shouldn't have the procedure paid for because they not going to produce potential people???


Ending the life of a potential person isn't a crime....so WTF are you going on about???

Yes, it's a medical procedure which you admit to in your following comment

If abortion has nothing to do with women's health and is NOT a medical procedure then how could it save a woman's life?

 

OHMYGAWD!


Do you REALLY think the ONLY reason people have sex is to re-pro-duce?


I am so sorry the education system/your parents/ life have let you down so badly by neglecting sex education....

 

"""" but having an abortion under the government's health system, would not be an available option to choose from."""

Then they just had a right, the right to their own body, taken away.

 

No, it's not the "ultimate method" of "killing lives".....a nuclear bomb would qualify, war would qualify, prescription drugs that are too expensive would qualify..etc. etc...

 

So you couldn't answer her question....

 

I didn't make up Roy Moore, though lots of little girls find him even worse than any made up boogeyman.

I mean, Jeebus, how can a supposedly moral man such as you seem to be have any part of a political party that would support this guy as a candidate AGAIN? Are all Republican's vaunted "morals" just a political facade? I mean YOU"RE not the candidate or getting any real benefit from him. Is being Elmer Gantry worth it just to get 1 more rep in Congress?

 

Hey, if you can't answer the question just don't post.

This is a DISCUSSION board, which means anybody who wants can ask you you a question about anything you post. Also it's clearly international in scope. YOU'RE the one harassing a poster and chilling board activity. We have an ignore function you know.

 

Why do you ask questions like that?

 

I meant what I said

 

Still no conservative in government named!

 

Then stop calling it healthcare if it's not always healthcare.

A woman wouldn't force herself to become pregnant. BIOLOGY would force her to become pregnant!

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Uh, is there some kind of problem??

There is only one way to say,

"" Women can get an abortion for any reason they choose."""

That is English, clear, precise...there is NO question what it says or means unless one has NO knowledge of the English language whatsoever,

Why would I? It is healthcare...abortion is a MEDICAL procedure.

Do you finally agree with "" Women can get an abortion for any reason they choose."""

...and nosy self righteous people with no life of their own would FORCE her to gestate...

 

Which I took advantage of for that particular member's ongoing failure to ever substantiate any of his bogus allegations.

 

You made up the image of roy moore that you are presenting here

He is a Christian who stands by his convictions but I never heard him say what you claim

 

No, it is "the election result." Preferential voting was put in place to allow people to support a minor party without splitting the vote on the right or left.

• 
  The main elements of the operation of preferential voting for single-member House of Representatives divisions are as follows:
  
  • Voters are required to place the number "1" against their first choice of candidate, known as the "first preference" or "primary vote".
  • Voters are then required to place the numbers "2", "3", etc., against all of the other candidates listed on the ballot paper, in order of preference. (Every candidate must be numbered, otherwise the vote becomes "informal" (spoiled) and does not count.)
  • Prior to counting, each ballot paper is examined to ensure that it is validly filled in (and not invalidated on other grounds).
  • The number "1" or first preference votes are counted first. If no candidate secures an absolute majority (more than half) of first preference votes, then the candidate with the fewest votes is excluded from the count.
  • The votes for the eliminated candidate (i.e., from the ballots that placed the eliminated candidate first) are re-allocated to the remaining candidates according to the number "2" or "second preference" votes.
  • If no candidate has yet secured an absolute majority of the vote, then the next candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. This preference allocation is repeated until there is a candidate with an absolute majority. Where a second (or subsequent) preference is expressed for a candidate who has already been eliminated, the voter's third or subsequent preferences are used.
  
  Following the full allocation of preferences, it is possible to derive a two-party-preferred figure, where the votes have been allocated between the two main candidates in the election. In Australia, this is usually between the candidates from the Coalition parties and the Australian Labor Party.
  
  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_system_of_Australia

• 
  

 

Do you see a question mark?

Good grief. Abortion is a form of birth control.

I thought you were pro-life. You go even further than Roe v. Wade.

Such as facilitate building an oil pipeline, going to war, financing public education, building public roads, and on and on.

 

What does preferential voting have to do with the two party preferred results percentage being able to be used as an accurate indicator of the election results?