The Sperminator’s 50th baby mama is a homeless 18-year-old from Harlem

SOOOO much SOOOOO wrong here on so many levels

First this man thinking he is a "Super Dad", see picture in link. Because he donated sperm to women he did not know to create children he will never know and does not support in any way.
Second that he would do so with a young girl with no means of supporting the child, who can't even support herself or maintain a family home.
Third the writers actually writing this
"Garrick has been on her own for about two years after leaving her mother’s Jamaica, Queens, home because “we fought a lot.” Without other family nearby (her father lives in Georgia), Garrick, who is unemployed, entered the shelter system."
She's NOT on her own she is on taxpayer support and her "partner " is too. Which do they think is REALLY going to be supporting this poor child?

This guy saying how "mature" she is when in fact neither of them have a clue about parenthood. Purposely denying this child even a chance to have a father in it's life in order to satisfy their own wants and desires.

Just another sign of how our society is breaking down and destroying that cornerstone of our society and species the nuclear family and marginalizing fathers.

"The Sperminator strikes again — this time donating his seed to an 18-year-old who lives in an East Harlem shelter. Her daughter, due July 12, will make it number 50 for the serial sperm donor.

Ari Nagel, the 43-year-old CUNY math professor who donates his sperm to women across the globe for free, has racked up serious spawn this past year: 15 babies since last Father’s Day, bringing the grand total to 48. One woman is due to give birth in early July, followed by Kaienja Garrick, who lives in the East River Family Center, a family shelter with a shared bathroom and kitchen......

...“He didn’t ask about anything,” she said. “ It’s good not to ask a lot of questions — it’s a woman’s choice.”

They met up in Manhattan Beach last fall, where Nagel donated into a cup on the spot. Two weeks later, Garrick knew she was going to be a mom....

...Last month, several members of Nagel’s “mom squad” — women who have given birth thanks to him — showed up at Garrick’s baby shower with diapers, clothes and cash...

...(Garrick didn’t get to meet all the women, however: She was hours late to the party, as she was getting her hair done, and some of the guests left before she arrived. Nagel cracked to Garrick’s father: “She’s only 18, you have to give her a break.”)"

And the rest is just as shocking
https://nypost.com/2019/06/15/the-s...ama-is-a-homeless-18-year-old-from-the-bronx/

Perhaps time for a law to force men who donate their sperm be responsible for the children produced if no one is there to provide for the child.

 

"Perhaps time for a law to force men who donate their sperm be responsible for the children produced if no one is there to provide for the child"

Um... no..

 

It's almost like the ancient Romans who would leave their babies to die slowly of exposure or predation in the woods.

 

Single "motherhood" ... federally subsidized "motherhood" ... has become an occupation. Now the proud "mommy" qualifies for housing subsidies. Soon the womens shelter will be able to accommodate Sperminators 51st expectant welfare "mom" while she gestates her" little bundle" ... of EBT joy.

 

Sorry, you lost me at "donated into a cup on the spot. "

 

There is, but the mother needs to make the claim. Your article even mentioned some of the other women he "donated" to suing for child support (though it doesn't mention the outcome). This doesn't feel like a great situation to me either, but I'm not sure what could practically be done to improve it.

 

It should be beyond the claim of the mother.

Perhaps we can start with bringing some shame to the whole idea and admit the important roles fathers play in a child's life and stop teaching children that having children is about THEM and not the child.

 

They met up in Manhattan Beach last fall, where Nagel donated into a cup on the spot. Two weeks later, Garrick knew she was going to be a mom....

several members of Nagel’s “mom squad”

^ Its a sexual fetish, impregnation and what sort of sounds like the makings of a harem. And I guarantee he didn't "donate into a cup". He ****ed her during her ovulation period at least once.

I'm gonna laugh when she sues his dumb ass for child support though

 

Dumb idea

 

I don’t see how that would work. Without the co-operation of the mother, how could the fathers parentage be formally proven (remember this specific guy is an extreme and unusual case)? And even then, how could you enforce “responsibility” anyway?

Nobody is stopping you trying to do that but I don’t think it’s as simple as you make out.

It’s worth noting that sperm (and egg) donation to childless couples is common and perfectly acceptable. Even in the case linked here, it appears to be a lesbian couple seeking the donation. In general terms, a stable lesbian couple having a child via some form of donation procedure isn’t an issue. The question marks this case raises is the informality (and therefore lack of regulation – though that word itself raises some controversy), the extent of the man’s “donations” and the capability of the mother to raise and care for the child given her circumstances.

 

I would just like to note the irony of people bashing the almost insignificant drain on society created by a guy donating his sperm to a bunch of women who want to have children, but are unable to afford said child, while also promoting the elimination of Roe v. Wade which would result in a massive drain on society created by forcing thousands or even millions of unwanted children to be born each year.

 

I would just like to note the irony of people bashing the almost insignificant drain on society created by a guy donating his sperm to a bunch of women who want to have children, but are unable to afford said child, while also promoting the elimination of Roe v. Wade which would result in a massive drain on society created by forcing thousands or even millions of unwanted children to be born each year.

 

Perhaps most astonishing, that sperm donor isn't exactly a prime specimen of manhood.
Why are so many women rushing to inseminate themselves with his seed?


Related thread: denying women access to Sperm Banks

If it were up to me, I'd put a stop to this based simply on its likely effect on the genepool.

 

"Unable to afford said child" ... without federal subsidies. Pro choicers support abortions performed because of economic situations. It's a womans right to abort a financial burden. Taxpayers should have the right to abort that burden too. Choose to have a child ... accept the responsibility of supporting that child.

 

There are far more childless couples wanting to adopt new borne than new borne available. Your total dodge to avoid the issue HERE noted. This is "accidental" pregnancy or rape. This is purposeful creation of a new life when the mother is purposely denying the child a father and unable to support herself let alone the baby. And this man, a college professor at that, facilitating that and then having the gall to call himself "super dad"

 

Who is paying for the invitro fertilization????? He isn't donating sperm, imo, he's having sex with all these women.

 

When the child is born the mother must produce the name of the father. If she doesn't know which man of many then all the names. Then require DNA testing. If she refuses to name the father then face sanctions up to having the child removed from the home.

How about we stop celebrating women who produce children without father's to raise them as some knife if brave courageous example of modern womanhood?

No problem with a nuclear family and a legal adoption absolving the sperm donor of any responsibility. A lesbian couple can never provide a father. Single mothers is now 80% in the black community and look at the results.

 

I don't give 2 craps about either....

 

For some reason I was expecting a rational answer. Even if that were somehow legal and practical, I don’t see how it enforced responsibility. I question whether that is possible at all, which raises the question of the whole purpose of the proposal in the first place.

But you don’t mind celebrating “fathers” sending a cheque once a week and visiting once a month? Also, in my experience, celebration of wilful single mothers is rare while your style of anger and hatred (even if you’re ignorant of the reason they’re raising a child alone) is all too common.

Plenty of non-nuclear families have and continue to bring up children perfectly well and plenty of nuclear families fail tragically for all sorts of reasons. The existence of a biological father isn’t a magic wand, any kind of assessment of the environment a child is to be brought up in would require much wider and deeper considerations (as actually happens with properly managed adoption and fostering for example).

 

You start with the enforceable financial responsibility.

How about every two weeks and yes they don't get to slough off their financial responsibility to the taxpayers. And in my experience turn on the daytime women's shows. 80% in the black community and this 18 a prime example.

And most succeed and provide the important balance of a father and a mother and we se the results of fatherless children.

Let me guess you believe fathers are unnecessary and make no difference in a child's life.

 

You touch on the really scary implication from repealing Roe v. Wade.

A government that is now permitted to force you to carry that child to term is also now permitted to force to stop carrying that child to term.

 

I don't know if you really believe that assertion or just spouting off total bullshit without any reason, but no. You are not correct.

And there is no "issue" in this thread. It is a "meh" story about a barely interesting personal situation.

 

Yeah ... it's real "scary" to imagine abortion as being equitable towards taxpayers.

 

...you really do not find anything to fear from permitting a government the authority to decide that someone must abort their child against their wishes?

 

I didn't say abort the child ... read my post again. I said "abort a financial burden" inferring that federal subsidies be withheld. To elaborate further, subsidies withheld from indigent women who look for a sperm donor despite having no means of support.