HUGE DEVELOPMENT: ROGER STONE Files Two Court Documents – BLASTS FBI and Mueller’s False Allegations

HUGE DEVELOPMENT: ROGER STONE Files Two Court Documents – BLASTS FBI and Mueller’s False Allegations that Russians Gave DNC Emails to WikiLeaks

Can you say Oops? Yep, legally speaking since the case against Roger Stone rests on the Russians actually having hacked a server -- that to this date the FBI still has not gotten their hands on -- it is only reasonable that the FBI now PROVE that the Russians hacked said server.

This is the same FBI, mind you, that blanket issued immunity to all those Hillary Clinton people and took DNC bought and paid for Crowdstrike's word for it that the Russians hacked the server and who routinely and mysteriously lose all documentation regarding testimony that would have hung Hillary Clinton out to dry on various issues if said FBI doccuments still existed. Oh dear!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...s-that-russians-gave-dnc-emails-to-wikileaks/

Roger Stone is requesting proof that Russians hacked the DNC server, as was reported in the

 

Make sure you donate your money to his legal defense fund @Gatewood

And you can tell this is a HUGE DEVELOPMENT because the words, "HUGE DEVELOPMENT" are in ALL CAPS.



Roger Stone is getting real desperate to avoid those felony convictions for witness tampering and lying under oath.

 

good luck with that

 

he is not a crook

 

He is charged with witness tampering, making false statements and obstruction of an official investigation....not sure why it matters if the Russians actually hacked or not. While I certainly would like to know what the FBI knows in that regard, i don't think it's necessary for the Govt to prove that to convict him.

 

I dont think he's been charged with stealing anything

 

Well, as it turns out the FBI never investigated it. Instead they used the Crowdstrike report and not only that, given to them by DNC lawyers redacted so they never even saw the full report.

 

If you were his attorney would you not require the FBI to prove the russians actually hacked the server? Simple question?

 

I would pursue any legal strategy that provided him with a remotely better shot at a better outcome. But, as struth notes:

So I think the only reason for Stone's filing is to try and delay the case and make the government spend more money/resources and thereby increase the chance that they would be willing to give a slightly more favorable settlement offer. Which again, as I said, if I were his attorney, that is something I would recommend so long as Stone was willing to pay me to do pursue it.

 

The FBI is claiming a hack on a server they have never looked at? Seriously?

We have a trap server in my company for the Chinese. They try and hit us about once a month. We rename this server all the time so that they never have the same path to our Intellectual Property twice. We also have company lunches where we laugh and rename "key files" which the steal. We used to put viruses in the server, but have stopped that practice a while back. Instead we just put bogus old code and other various B.S.

If we didn't have access to that server, there is no way we would know it was hacked. How does the FBI make such a claim?

 

Alright cool an honest statement, yes this is a good strategy that should be pursued, it's not a political strategy. If the judge goes along with it we'll finally find out the answer to a pretty legitimate question and that's if Crowdstrike's analysis is acceptable when not reviewed by the guys that do this for a living, the fbi, cia and nsa.

 

Sounds like just another JOKE (being pushed by an RW Trash Blog).

Anybody can "File" anything in Court.

I could go downtown right now (and if I felt like wasting money on a Filing Fee) I could "File" a Case Suing Bigfoot.

This isn't a "Huge Development" (except in the minds of RW Tinfoil Hats who see a Conspiracy in every wisp of their coffee clouds).

This idiotic "filing" will be thrown out of court.

Thanks for the laughs.

The Gateway Pundit?

 

Oh I disagree. It is definitely a bad strategy and a political strategy.

But if Stone was willing to pay me to do it as his lawyer, then I would pursue the strategy.

 

Proving the FBI never investigated the DNC server, which all of their hacking claims are based on, is a bad strategy?

 

You mean Roger Stone...the Liar....who tipped off trump when the Russians were going to dump stolen emails? You mean that soulless slug?

 

You actually have to have a legal foundation for the crimes you claim a fellow committed. No legal foundation . . . the 'crimes' are dismissed -- or at least the penalty is greatly lessened; which is why when all was said and done Popadopolous got only a fourteen days worth of sentencing. If Stone can prove that the FBI has got no proof of Russian hacking then everything Mueller charged him will becomes meaningless.

 

Yep.

I can't wait until the FBI has to explain they took the word of the DNC's lawyers for what happened, based on the opinion of a company full of Obama appointees.

https://www.crowdstrike.com/resourc...mmission-on-enhancing-national-cybersecurity/

 

never said he was....

 

if I was charged with a crime I was innocent of, I could still be charged with crimes for witness tampering and obstruction if I did those things

 

Yep . . . even an Obama appointed leftist activist judge is likely going to choke over that one.

 

Fruit of the poisoned tree in which all charges following a false prosecution are dismissed.

 

Thought you were implying he was a crook

 

It doesn’t.

And Stone’s motions were dismissed out of hand.

Stone is under a gag order.

These motions serve to plant memes in right wing media.

 

As I noted to another poster. Proving an underlying crime or trying to compel a third party to produce evidence that is not releavant to the case is BS.

But Roger Stone trades in BS, as does his accolade, Donald Trump.

This “fruit of a poisonous tree” meme is something that talk radio types repeat to each other. But it has no relevance.

The motions were dismissed out of hand.

Stone’s objective was to promote the “fruit” meme in right wing blogs. At least two of the more well known ones picked it up and spewed it out.

And, so far, two Trumpsters here fell for it!