Alabama’s Draconian Abortion Ban Has Women On Twitter Ready To Fight

To put it in engineering terms such an all powerful god who design the human reproductive system so if this god care about the lives of human fetuses he would not had design in a fifty percent death rate now would he!!!!

One way or the other this all powerful god does not care about human fetuses.

 

Or to use their own asinine terminology throwing away acorns would be MURDERING the "unborn saplings".

 

I have a problem when those acorns have already sprouted and have begun to form little leaflets on them.

 

Respecting a woman's choice also means respecting a man's choice to leave if there is no child and that is a dealbreaker.

They are not forcing her not to get an abortion, fully respecting her choice, but at the same time embracing their choice.

Surely this is the goal.

 

Want to make a bet??
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/othe...or-a-lot-of-things-besides-welfare/ar-AACP9Dn

 

And what contributes to that 50% death rate? Is every pregnant woman in ideal fit physical condition for pregnancy? Or do some of them weigh one thousand pounds?

 

WTF....so now we start blaming fat women? Frankly, a 1000lb woman is extremely unlikely to become pregnant....think about how babies get made.

 

BIOLOGY

AGAIN,"" Blame The Woman For Everything"" …..the right should have a theme song they sing with that title

 

Disfunctional white girls have no excuse either

 

NOPE!!!

 

"Sapling" equates with "having developed to the point of viability" and is acknowledged as being a little tree.

VS ​

Presumably, those who advocate far greater control of a woman's reproductive system by the State view the State as being far superior to each individual American whose concern is personal and who is most impacted, and who is free to consult with the medical and spiritual advisers, friends and family members whom she trusts.

Such faith in the impersonal State to proclaim from on high and rigorously enforce blanket edicts that supersede individual, informed prerogatives in such personal matters is quite remarkable.

Surely, if the State can relieve every American of having to make such intimate, consequential decisions for herself, it can and should expropriate a broad range of less personally impactful personal choices as well.

My preference is based upon my confidence and respect for the individual American to make decisions for herself that are far better informed than those made for her by the impersonal bureaucracy in which the Statists conspire to place so much faith on behalf of others.

These are the politicians who are impersonally sentencing rape victims in Alabama to suffer the consequences of their victimization:

​

In fact, under Alabama law, the parental rights of rapists are protected.

 

Innocent human life has a right to life

And the unborn child is guilty of no crime

 

A microscopic mindless entity at the moment of conception is not a child. It only has the potential of becoming one if it develops to the point of viability.

If and until that stage is reached, please keep your politicians out of the wombs of Americans.

 

Can you explain why her FACTS would be wrong because she's from another country ?????


Did you know the Internet is global.

C'mon, can't you see how obvious it is that you have no answers to her FACTS and are using an irrational excuse not to reply....

 

Neither are pregnant women.....and they also have a right to life....

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Can you explain why her FACTS would be wrong because she's from another country ?????


Did you know the Internet is global.

C'mon, can't you see how obvious it is that you have no answers to her FACTS and are using an irrational excuse not to reply....

Too bad you didn't make the rules


HERE, I post this, me, an America loving American:

Numerous state evaluations of federally-funded programs have yielded similar conclusions. A 2004 review by Advocates for Youth of 11 state-based evaluations found that abstinence-only programs showed little evidence of sustained (long-term) impact on attitudes and intentions. Worse, they showed some negative impacts on youth’s willingness to use contraception, including condoms, to prevent negative sexual health outcomes related to sexual intercourse. In only one state did any program demonstrate short-term success in youth’s delaying the initiation of sex. None of the programs showed evidence of long-term success in delaying sexual initiation among youth enrolled in the programs. None of the programs showed any evidence of success in reducing other sexual risk-taking behaviors among participants.7 More specifically, a 2003 Pennsylvania evaluation found that the state-sponsored programs were largely ineffective in delaying sexual onset or promoting skills and attitudes consistent with sexual abstinence.7 Arizona and Kansas had similar findings of no
The Facts
change in behaviors.7 A 2004 evaluation from Texas found no significant changes in the percentage of students who pledged not to have sex until marriage. As in two other studies, the Texas analysis revealed that the percentage of students who reported having engaged in sexual intercourse increased for nearly all ages.7""""



NO excuses now

 

Agreed

 

HERE, I post this, me, an America loving American:

"""""""""""Numerous state evaluations of federally-funded programs have yielded similar conclusions. A 2004 review by Advocates for Youth of 11 state-based evaluations found that abstinence-only programs showed little evidence of sustained (long-term) impact on attitudes and intentions. Worse, they showed some negative impacts on youth’s willingness to use contraception, including condoms, to prevent negative sexual health outcomes related to sexual intercourse. In only one state did any program demonstrate short-term success in youth’s delaying the initiation of sex. None of the programs showed evidence of long-term success in delaying sexual initiation among youth enrolled in the programs. None of the programs showed any evidence of success in reducing other sexual risk-taking behaviors among participants.7 More specifically, a 2003 Pennsylvania evaluation found that the state-sponsored programs were largely ineffective in delaying sexual onset or promoting skills and attitudes consistent with sexual abstinence.7 Arizona and Kansas had similar findings of no
The Facts
change in behaviors.7 A 2004 evaluation from Texas found no significant changes in the percentage of students who pledged not to have sex until marriage. As in two other studies, the Texas analysis revealed that the percentage of students who reported having engaged in sexual intercourse increased for nearly all ages.7""""


No excuses now

 

You man global as in the russians posting on facebook?

I thought libdom was against foreign influence in our elections

 

Abortion is an international issue

 

LOL! Oh, NOW it's "Russians in elections!!""


Anything but address the post and facts:HERE, I post this, me, an America loving American:

"""""""""""Numerous state evaluations of federally-funded programs have yielded similar conclusions. A 2004 review by Advocates for Youth of 11 state-based evaluations found that abstinence-only programs showed little evidence of sustained (long-term) impact on attitudes and intentions. Worse, they showed some negative impacts on youth’s willingness to use contraception, including condoms, to prevent negative sexual health outcomes related to sexual intercourse. In only one state did any program demonstrate short-term success in youth’s delaying the initiation of sex. None of the programs showed evidence of long-term success in delaying sexual initiation among youth enrolled in the programs. None of the programs showed any evidence of success in reducing other sexual risk-taking behaviors among participants.7 More specifically, a 2003 Pennsylvania evaluation found that the state-sponsored programs were largely ineffective in delaying sexual onset or promoting skills and attitudes consistent with sexual abstinence.7 Arizona and Kansas had similar findings of no
The Facts
change in behaviors.7 A 2004 evaluation from Texas found no significant changes in the percentage of students who pledged not to have sex until marriage. As in two other studies, the Texas analysis revealed that the percentage of students who reported having engaged in sexual intercourse increased for nearly all ages.7""""



I think it can be seen that the point has been made.... I won't bug you about this anymore...no need to...

 

Let us just say this is not MY idea of a world map but there might be a few on this forum who agree with it

 

Acorns are more comparable to chicken eggs than human fetuses.

Animals like primates require gestation in their mothers, while chicken eggs can gestate outside their mothers.

You'll notice that an acorn doesn't begin sprouting inside its parent oak tree.

Oh, if women could simply lay an egg and be done with it, how simple it would be!
The woman should be glad she's not a whale. (gestation period 10-14 months)

 

I agreethat teaching absentence is best when it comes in the home where parents lead by example

If your single mom has a string of live-in boyfriends in the home what you hear in school will not be very persuasive

 

Sad that you only know two scenarios of life......there really are more...