Project Veritas – Google Exec Decries Trump’s Election: ‘How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again’

And lost...

 

the Cake Baker isn't claiming to be unbias and impartial with their product

its not that Google is a liberal company that manipulates their product to favor one side over the other they are making the claim they don't which is a lie its called misrepresenting their product which is against the law

Google can continue with what they do if they want but they need to make a disclaimer that what they present what they provide is bias and not impartial its manipulated to favor the left

a consumer has the right to know about what they consume correct?

 

Google is a private corporation that censors the internet in both places.

Google does the commies bidding.

 

No O'Keefe has been caught numerous times editing the film.

 

If you can't tell the difference between Mom&Pop shops with dozens of competitors in the local vicinity and 5 or 6 billionaires that control what information the entire planet can access on social media, then I can't help you. I certainly can tell the difference just as I can tell the difference between an ant hill and the Rocky Mountains.

TBH, I think you can tell the difference but because the right ox is being gored you choose to pretend otherwise (and not very convincingly). Your ox will be gored eventually, count on it.

 

Do I have to explain what the phrase "so far" means? Really?

 

do you know who else edits their footage?
every dam news outlet that ever exists its why they have editing departments
do you not think that Trump interviews aren't edited so to fit a two hour interview into an hour show?
you are trying to equate editing to creating a fake and its dishonest bull crap

 

Yup, sure do but

Keep trying if you like, and I'll continue to paste you word for word!

 

Standard Right Wing Scare Tactics from Breitbart . Hannity will run this for years on a daily basis !

They will beat this horse to death like " Benghazi " and " Uranium 1 "

 

So far means up until this point. Up to this point in time. You can keep copy/pasting if you think that will help you understand what the words mean at some point.

 

What an utterly ludicrous attempt at "logic".

Trump is the one DOING "the commies bidding".

^That is WHY Russia interfered in 2016 to get Trump Elected.

So, that Trump could do Russia's (aka "commie's") bidding.

I mean, talk about "weak sauce".

Even in terms of looking for any excuse to use that Ridiculous Meme that you picked up around the Fever Swamp, your attempt at "logic" is an Epic Fail.

In FACT, Google is doing the Opposite:

Getting rid of Trump = Getting RID of "commie" influence.

Any chance of making a post that doesn't include a Lame RW Meme?

Google is perfectly within their rights. More power to them.

Google= True Patriots.

 

It seems that there is a one to one correlation between those who believe Okeefe's bullshit and those who think Trump is making America great again. No amount of facts will alter their beliefs.

But I get how much less intellectually taxing it is to simply accept lying bullshit that fits one's strongly held opinions. Saves a lot of energy so they can go out and fight the good fight against their fellow americans.

 

It is one thing to edit for time purposes, it is another to make misleading statements. Two late night comedians made millions on Fox News misleading and false segments.

 

https://www.theblaze.com/tag/does-raw-video-of-npr-expose-reveal-questionable-editing-tactics

Even Glenn Beck doesn’t fall for this shyster

 

Hmmm..... what could it be?? hmmm... single or sole proprietor vs publicly traded multinational corporation with a million times the revenue? Golly, I mean when you state it like that, they're exactly the same, huh?? LOL. Clearly you also aren't willing to deal with the difference between not creating a message and censoring information cause, in your mind these are the same things? I am not advocating that the Googlie have to put any message out there. I'm advocating that they be charged with election meddling because they are actively engaged in illegal election campaign finance through the active use of their platform to campaign both for their candidates and using their platform to attack others. Gosh, that you would want to support that... it is unique...

 

You logic here is apples must then be kumquats... No body here is suggesting that the Googlie have to publish anything. Because frankly, it isn't their content to publish or print. But they are using their platform as a campaign finance aid, aren't they? And that seems just peachy with you, now, isn't it?

 

Who's messages do you suppose google is printing? They aren't their own content publishers, and never have been. The difference here is that the googlie are using their AI to push other content based on ideology. Clearly that's what you're supporting here. And while they aren't exactly the engine of Pravda, they aren't far off. You're a freedom guy, aren't you? Do you suppose that the Googlie doing the work of tyranny is something that you support these days?

 

How is that relevant? That is how the news is produced.
Can you name one news broadcast or newspaper that does not edit video and news copy?

 

So google doesn't have the same rights as the other "corporations are people"? Public companies can't participate in politics or express their owners beliefs? Citizen's united sorta put your argument in the trash can. It isn't election meddling, its exercising rights granted to corporations by the supreme court.

How inconvenient.

 

Liberals here DARE claim someoen edits, when nearly every Trump quote people get upset about has been edited or taken out of context=) The biggest offenders are "good people", "Mexicans are murders" and "pu$$y grabbers". COMPLETELY false and clipped, yet liberals here quote them day after day, not having any clue what so ever what the original quotes actually said. Some still believe Bush said the war was Mission Accomplished and Sarah Palin said she could see russia from her house. /sheep

 

I suppose it didn't occur to you that the value of the services actually overcame the personal contribution levels, huh? It also seems you don't actually understand what the ruling said..

 

7 ways to dump Google
https://medium.com/@re_53711/seven-simple-steps-toward-online-privacy-20dcbb9fa82

 

I don't suppose that it also didn't occur to you that Googlie also acts as one of the state sponsors of information censorship in places like China, Russia, et al did it? So, given that they are so actively involved in the state sponsored tyranny of others, do you really think it's a good idea for these obviously state sponsored services to be deployed in the US?

 

True.

One of the Worst (of many adverse) Consequences of Trump's Election, was the way that it served to legitimize these RW Tinfoil Hat Sites (like Breitbart, Etc.) that nobody took seriously.

Places that served no other purpose than to feed the RW Fever Swamp Conspiratorial Confirmation Bias, that suddenly became "legitimate" (because Trump is a Tinfoil Hat Looney Tune).

O'Keefe and PV are a Complete Joke.:smh:

 

You believe everything you read on Brietbart? Can’t you find that without Google holding your hand?